Identification of high-risk drugs related to chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program-sponsored phase I trials.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a significant and debilitating side effect. However, there have been no studies of the relative risk of CIPN with known causative agents. We examined the risk of CIPN in patients taking such agents as a part of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program-sponsored phase I trials. METHODS: CIPN events in each patient were graded according to the Clinical Terminology of Common Adverse Effects and compared among several high-risk chemotherapeutic agent groups, adjusting for possible confounding factors. Patients receiving tubulin-targeted agents were analysed separately for specific background factors associated with CIPN. RESULTS: In 135 phase I clinical trials, 259 of 3614 patients were identified as developing CIPN during chemotherapy. Tubulin-targeting agents and proteasome inhibitors were identified as high-risk agents (hazard ratio 9.04 and 5.01, respectively) for CIPN, whereas platinum-complex agents and thalidomide analogues imparted lower risk (hazard ratio 1.52 and 1.11, respectively). Age, sex and medical history of diabetes were not significantly related to CIPN. CIPN developed over time as the number of chemotherapy cycles increased. Among patients with CIPN, treatment with tubulin-targeting agents resulted in a significantly higher rate of chemotherapy schedule modification compared with treatments with other chemotherapeutic agents. CONCLUSIONS: Tubulin-targeting agents and proteasome inhibitors were associated with a greatly increased risk of CIPN compared with other agents. CIPN tended to develop in later chemotherapy cycles. These findings will help to minimise the risk of CIPN by encouraging increased surveillance and earlier dose adjustment of high-risk agents in phase I trials.

Effect of Renal Dysfunction on Toxicity in Three Decades of Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program-Sponsored Single-Agent Phase I Studies.

PURPOSE: Alterations in renal clearance of anticancer drugs can affect the occurrence of toxicities related to drug exposure. The National Cancer Institute and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) use different criteria to classify renal dysfunction. We examined those discrepancies and their potential association with the incidence of toxicities in patients enrolled onto Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program-sponsored single-agent phase I studies over three decades (1979 to 2010). METHODS: Data to estimate creatinine clearance according to the Cockcroft-Gault and Jelliffe formulas were available from 10,236 patients, and data to estimate creatinine clearance according to the six- and four-variable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formulas were available from a subset (n = 4,084). Patients were classified according to National Cancer Institute and FDA criteria, and the rates of clinically relevant toxicities were evaluated within groups and compared among groups. RESULTS: Cockcroft-Gault estimated renal function improved over time, which may be attributed to an increase in weight of patients in the same time frame. Approximately 36% of patients enrolled onto phase I trials had mild renal dysfunction by FDA criteria. Relative to normal function, mild renal dysfunction was associated with a statistically significant but small increase in grade 3 or 4 nonhematologic toxicity and any relevant toxicities. CONCLUSION: Patients with mild renal dysfunction by FDA criteria have routinely been enrolled onto phase I studies of antineoplastics without clinically meaningful increase in the risk of toxicity. In future oncology renal dysfunction trials based on the FDA classification, the FDA mild group may only need to be activated when the moderate and normal groups differ substantially in tolerability or pharmacokinetics.

Behavioral evidence for competing motivational drives of nociception and hunger.

Homeostasis, an organisms' tendency to maintain a healthy balance of the physiological state of the body, is necessary for survival. Hunger induces a motivational state to consume food. Recently, pain has been referred to as a homeostatic emotion similar to hunger or thirst in that animals are motivated to respond in a certain way that may increase their chance of survival. Therefore, the purpose of the present experiment was to examine behavior in rodents during two competing homeostatic/motivational drives (i.e., hunger and formalin pain). During the first phase of the formalin test, animals displayed typical responsiveness to the inflammatory condition and completed fewer chains for food reinforcement as compared to the baseline session. However, during the second phase of the formalin test, animals showed decreased nociceptive behavior compared to formalin-injected animals that were not trained in the operant conditioning paradigm. During this phase, the trained animals exhibited maximal responsiveness for food reinforcement. These results demonstrate that the engagement of behaviors reflecting motivational drives to restore homeostasis depends on the intensity or degree of imbalance of the competing drives. More specifically, animals are motivated to attend to one state of imbalance at a time.