Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur J Health Econ ; 8(2): 145-51, 2007 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17333088

RESUMO

The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence recommends vinorelbine (VNB), paclitaxel, docetaxel, and gemcitabine in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. An economic model was prepared to determine the comparative cost of these agents, including the new oral formulation of VNB from a United Kingdom National Health System perspective. Clinical effectiveness was determined from published trials. Costs of drug acquisition, administration, toxicity management, and patient transportation costs were calculated from reference publications. A Markov model was used to estimate the cost per patient over 52 weeks. Intravenous VNB, gemcitabine, paclitaxel, and docetaxel incur annual follow-up costs of 3,746 pounds, 5,332 pounds, 5,977 pounds, and 6,766 pounds, respectively, while oral VNB with outpatient administration on d1, and self-administration at home on d8 every 21 days has a cost per patient per year of 2,888 pounds. Oral VNB allows further hospital resources savings.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos/economia , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Oral , Custos e Análise de Custo , Vias de Administração de Medicamentos , Serviços de Assistência Domiciliar , Humanos , Infusões Intravenosas , Medicina Estatal , Reino Unido
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...