Evolution of spontaneous portosystemic shunts over time and following aetiological intervention in patients with cirrhosis.

Background & Aims: Spontaneous portosystemic shunts (SPSS) develop frequently in cirrhosis. Changes over time and the effect of aetiological interventions on SPSS are unknown, so we aimed to explore the effect of these variables on SPSS evolution. Methods: Patients with cirrhosis from the Baveno VI-SPSS cohort were selected provided a follow-up abdominal CT or MRI scan was available. Clinical and laboratory data were collected at baseline and follow-up. Imaging tests were reviewed to evaluate changes in the presence and size of SPSS (large (L)-SPSS was ≥8 mm) over time. Regarding alcohol- or HCV-related cirrhosis, two populations were defined: cured patients (abstinent from alcohol or successful HCV therapy), and non-cured patients. Results: A total of 617 patients were included. At baseline SPSS distribution was 22% L-SPSS, 30% small (S)-SPSS, and 48% without (W)-SPSS. During follow-up (median follow-up of 63 months), SPSS distribution worsened: L-SPSS 26%, S-SPSS 32%, and W-SPSS 42% (p <0.001). Patients with worse liver function during follow-up showed a simultaneous aggravation in SPSS distribution. Non-cured patients (n = 191) experienced a significant worsening in liver function, more episodes of liver decompensation and lower transplant-free survival compared to cured patients (n = 191). However, no differences were observed regarding SPSS distribution at inclusion and at follow-up, with both groups showing a trend to worsening. Total shunt diameter increased more in non-cured (52%) than in cured patients (28%). However, total shunt area (TSA) significantly increased only in non-cured patients (74 to 122 mm2, p <0.001). Conclusions: The presence of SPSS in cirrhosis increases over time and parallels liver function deterioration. Aetiological intervention in these patients reduces liver-related complications, but SPSS persist although progression is decreased. Impact and implications: There is no information regarding the evolution of spontaneous portosystemic shunts (SPSS) during the course of cirrhosis, and especially after disease regression with aetiological interventions, such as HCV treatment with direct-acting antivirals or alcohol abstinence. These results are relevant for clinicians dealing with patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension because they have important implications for the management of cirrhosis with SPSS after disease regression. From a practical point of view, physicians should be aware that in advanced cirrhosis with portal hypertension, after aetiological intervention, SPSS mostly persist despite liver function improvement, and complications related to SPSS may still develop.

Presence of NOD2 mutations is not associated with hepatic or systemic hemodynamic abnormalities of cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with cirrhosis who carry NOD2 mutations are susceptible to bacterial infections. The aim was to evaluate the association of NOD2 mutations with hepatic and systemic hemodynamics in cirrhosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of a prospectively collected database in the context of the screening for the INCA trial (EudraCT 2013-001626-26). This cross-sectional study compared hemodynamic findings according to NOD2 status in 215 patients. Patients were genotyped for NOD2 variants (p.N289S, p.R702W, p.G908R, c.3020insC, rs72796367). Hepatic hemodynamic study and right heart catheterization were performed. RESULTS: Patients had a median age of 59 (IQR 53-66) years, and 144 (67%) were men. Most patients (64%) were Child-Pugh stage B. Sixty-six patients (31%) carried a NOD2 mutation, which was slightly more common among Child-Pugh stage C (p = 0.05), without differences in MELD [wild-type: 13 (10-16); NOD2 variants 13 (10-18)]. No differences in hepatic and systemic hemodynamics were observed according to NOD2 status. If excluding patients on prophylactic or therapeutic antibiotics, again no association between hepatic or systemic hemodynamics and NOD2 status could be observed. CONCLUSION: NOD2 mutations are not associated with hepatic or systemic hemodynamic abnormalities in patients with decompensated cirrhosis, suggesting that other mechanisms leading to bacterial translocation predominate.

Influence of NOD2 risk variants on hepatic encephalopathy and association with inflammation, bacterial translocation and immune activation.

BACKGROUND: Nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain containing 2 (NOD2) risk variants lead to impaired mucosal barrier function, increased bacterial translocation (BT), and systemic inflammation. AIM: To evaluate the association between the presence of NOD2 risk variants, BT, inflammation, and hepatic encephalopathy (HE). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective multicenter study included patients with cirrhosis and testing for NOD2 risk variants (p.R702W, p.G908R, c.3020insC, N289S, and c.-958T>C). Patients were evaluated for covert (C) and overt (O) HE. Markers of systemic inflammation (leukocytes, CRP, IL-6, LBP) and immune activation (soluble CD14) as well as bacterial endotoxin (hTRL4 activation) were determined in serum. RESULTS: Overall, 172 patients (70% men; median age 60 [IQR 54-66] years; MELD 12 [IQR 9-16]; 72% ascites) were included, of whom 53 (31%) carried a NOD2 risk variant. In this cohort, 11% presented with OHE and 27% and CHE. Presence and severity of HE and surrogates of inflammation, BT, and immune activation did not differ between patients with and without a NOD2 risk variant, also not after adjustment for MELD. HE was associated with increased ammonia and systemic inflammation, as indicated by elevated CRP (w/o HE: 7.2 [2.7-16.7]; with HE 12.6 [4.5-29.7] mg/dL; p < 0.001) and elevated soluble CD14 (w/o HE 2592 [2275-3033]; with HE 2755 [2410-3456] ng/mL; p = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of NOD2 risk variants in patients with cirrhosis is not associated with HE and has no marked impact on inflammation, BT, or immune activation. In contrast, the presence of HE was linked to ammonia, the acute phase response, and myeloid cell activation.

Liver-HERO: hepatorenal syndrome-acute kidney injury (HRS-AKI) treatment with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in patients with cirrhosis-a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with cirrhosis and ascites (and portal hypertension) are at risk of developing acute kidney injury (AKI). Although many etiologies exist, hepatorenal AKI (HRS-AKI) remains a frequent and difficult-to-treat cause, with a very high mortality when left untreated. The standard of care is the use of terlipressin and albumin. This can lead to reversal of AKI, which is associated to survival. Nevertheless, only approximately half of the patients achieve this reversal and even after reversal patients remains at risk for new episodes of HRS-AKI. TIPS is accepted for use in patients with variceal bleeding and refractory ascites, which leads to a reduction in portal pressure. Although preliminary data suggest it may be useful in HRS-AKI, its use in this setting is controversial and caution is recommended given the fact that HRS-AKI is associated to cardiac alterations and acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) which represent relative contraindications for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). In the last decades, with the new definition of renal failure in patients with cirrhosis, patients are identified at an earlier stage. These patients are less sick and therefore more likely to not have contraindications for TIPS. We hypothesize that TIPS could be superior to the standard of care in patients with HRS-AKI. METHODS: This study is a prospective, multicenter, open, 1:1-randomized, controlled parallel-group trial. The main end-point is to compare the 12-month liver transplant-free survival in patients assigned to TIPS compared to the standard of care (terlipressin and albumin). Secondary end-point include reversal of HRS-AKI, health-related Quality of Life (HrQoL), and incidence of further decompensation among others. Once patients are diagnosed with HRS-AKI, they will be randomized to TIPS or Standard of Care (SOC). TIPS should be placed within 72 h. Until TIPS placement, TIPS patients will be treated with terlipressin and albumin. Once TIPS is placed, terlipressin and albumin should be weaned off according to the attending physician. DISCUSSION: If the trial were to show a survival advantage for patients who undergo TIPS placement, this could be incorporated in routine clinical practice in the management of patients with HRS-AKI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT05346393 . Released to the public on 01 April 2022.

Prevalence of Minimal Hepatic Encephalopathy in Patients With Liver Cirrhosis: A Multicenter Study.

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE), in particular in different subgroups, remains unknown. This study aimed to analyze the prevalence of MHE in different subgroups to identify patients at high risk and to pave the way for personalized screening approaches. METHODS: In this study, data of patients recruited at 10 centers across Europe and the United States were analyzed. Only patients without clinical signs of hepatic encephalopathy were included. MHE was detected using the Psychometric Hepatic Encephalopathy Score (PHES, cut-off < or ≤-4 depending on local norms). Clinical and demographic characteristics of the patients were assessed and analyzed. RESULTS: In total, 1,868 patients with cirrhosis with a median model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) of 11 were analyzed (Child-Pugh [CP] stages: A 46%, B 42%, and C 12%). In the total cohort, MHE was detected by PHES in 650 patients (35%). After excluding patients with a history of overt hepatic encephalopathy, the prevalence of MHE was 29%. In subgroup analyses, the prevalence of MHE in patients with CP A was low (25%), whereas it was high in CP B or C (42% and 52%). In patients with a MELD score <10, the prevalence of MHE was only 25%, but it was 48% in patients with a MELD score ≥20. Standardized ammonia levels (ammonia level/upper limit of normal of each center) correlated significantly, albeit weakly with PHES (Spearman ρ = -0.16, P < 0.001). DISCUSSION: The prevalence of MHE in patients with cirrhosis was high but varied substantially between diseases stages. These data may pave the way for more individualized MHE screening approaches.

BCL-XL Overexpression Protects Pancreatic ß-Cells against Cytokine- and Palmitate-Induced Apoptosis.

Diabetes is a chronic disease that affects glucose metabolism, either by autoimmune-driven ß-cell loss or by the progressive loss of ß-cell function, due to continued metabolic stresses. Although both α- and ß-cells are exposed to the same stressors, such as proinflammatory cytokines and saturated free fatty acids (e.g., palmitate), only α-cells survive. We previously reported that the abundant expression of BCL-XL, an anti-apoptotic member of the BCL-2 family of proteins, is part of the α-cell defense mechanism against palmitate-induced cell death. Here, we investigated whether BCL-XL overexpression could protect ß-cells against the apoptosis induced by proinflammatory and metabolic insults. For this purpose, BCL-XL was overexpressed in two ß-cell lines-namely, rat insulinoma-derived INS-1E and human insulin-producing EndoC-ßH1 cells-using adenoviral vectors. We observed that the BCL-XL overexpression in INS-1E cells was slightly reduced in intracellular Ca2+ responses and glucose-stimulated insulin secretion, whereas these effects were not observed in the human EndoC-ßH1 cells. In INS-1E cells, BCL-XL overexpression partially decreased cytokine- and palmitate-induced ß-cell apoptosis (around 40% protection). On the other hand, the overexpression of BCL-XL markedly protected EndoC-ßH1 cells against the apoptosis triggered by these insults (>80% protection). Analysis of the expression of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress markers suggests that resistance to the cytokine and palmitate conferred by BCL-XL overexpression might be, at least in part, due to the alleviation of ER stress. Altogether, our data indicate that BCL-XL plays a dual role in ß-cells, participating both in cellular processes related to ß-cell physiology and in fostering survival against pro-apoptotic insults.

Prognostic implications of systolic function in patients with cirrhosis.

INTRODUCTION: LV intrinsic systolic cardiac function in cirrhotic patients is conditioned by the degree of sympathetic activation and the use of non-selective beta-blockers (NSBBs). Systolic function can be non-invasively measured by ultrasound using Ejection Intraventricular Pressure Differences in the LV (EIVPD). We aimed to address the relationship between systolic function and long-term clinical outcomes using EIVPD. METHODS: We studied 45 Child-Pugh B or C patients (13 female, 24 on NSBBs) using echocardiography. The primary endpoint was the combination of any-cause mortality or liver transplantation. After a follow-up of 7 years (796 person-months) and a median period of 17 (10-42) months, 41 patients (91%) reached the primary endpoint: 13 (29%) died and 28 (62%) underwent transplantation. RESULTS: By univariable analysis the primary endpoint was related exclusively to MELD score. However, in a multivariable proportional-hazards analysis, adjusted for age, sex and MELD score, EIVPD was inversely related to the primary endpoint, showing interaction with NSBBs. In patients without NSBBs, EIVPD inversely predicted the primary endpoint, whereas in patients with NSBBs, EIVPD was unrelated to outcomes. These relationships were undetected by myocardial strain or conventional cardiac indices. CONCLUSIONS: LV intrinsic systolic function, as noninvasively measured by EIVPD is a predictor of long-term outcomes in patients with cirrhosis. The prognostic value of EIVPD is present along any degree of liver dysfunction but blunted by NSBBs. Because NSBBs have a deep effect on myocardial contractility, these drugs need to be considered when assessing the prognostic implications of cardiac function in these patients.

Subclinical cognitive impairment in chronic kidney disease is associated with frailty and reduced quality of life.

BACKGROUND: Cognitive impairment (CI) in chronic kidney disease (CKD) is highly prevalent and is associated with multiple limitations to patients as well as a higher mortality, more days of hospitalisation and a lower quality of life. Frailty in CKD is associated with adverse health outcomes and is also highly prevalent. The aim of our study was to determine the prevalence and characteristics of CI and relate the findings to frailty, mobility, muscle strength and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). METHODS: Non-dialysis patients with CKD stages 3-5 were prospectively evaluated for inclusion. Excluded were patients with other cognitive disorders, signs of overt uraemic encephalopathy, severe infection and hyponatraemia. All patients underwent psychometric testing (five different tests): assessments of mobility, strength and frailty and an evaluation of HRQOL. Based on the number of pathological psychometric test results, we established two different definitions of CI: subclinical uraemic encephalopathy 1 (SUE1: one pathological test) and subclinical uraemic encephalopathy 2 (SUE2: two or more pathological test results). RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were included [median age 66 years (interquartile range 57-75), male 55%]. Most patients had CKD stage 3 (48%; stage 4: 32%; stage 5: 19%). CI was highly prevalent (SUE1: 60%; SUE2: 42%) and associated with a higher risk of falls (pathological tandem gait test; SUE1: 50% versus 16%, P = .023; SUE2: 69% versus 15%, P = .001), lower muscle strength (SUE2-pathological: 39% versus 7%, P = .008), frailty (SUE1: 59% versus 28%, P = .038; SUE2: 67% versus 33%, P = .028) and HRQOL. CONCLUSION: CI is highly prevalent in non-dialysis CKD patients. Even mild CI is associated with decreased mobility, muscle strength and HRQOL and increased frailty.

Evaluation of the definition of hyperdynamic circulation in patients with cirrhosis and ascites.

The aim of this study was to evaluate potential criteria for defining hyperdynamic circulation in patients with cirrhosis according to the severity of ascites and its association with the activation of vasoactive systems and markers of systemic inflammation. Cross-sectional study of patients with cirrhosis and right heart catheter measurement from two different academic centers. We evaluated systemic vascular resistance (SVR)/cardiac output (CO) according to ascites severity. The first substudy evaluated the possible definition, the second validated the findings, and the third evaluated the possible mechanisms. Comparisons were performed by means of t test, Mann-Whitney U test, and analysis of variance. Finally, linear regression curves were adjusted to evaluate the relationship between CO and SVR according to the severity of ascites and compensated or decompensated stage of cirrhosis. The study included 721 patients (substudy 1, n = 437; substudy 2, n = 197; substudy 3, n = 87). Hyperdynamic circulation (HC), defined by absolute cutoffs, had no association with the presence or severity of ascites in the first two cohorts. No association was observed between HC with renin, aldosterone, or markers of bacterial translocation. Comparison of linear regression curves showed a shift of the CO-SVR relationship to the left in patients with refractory ascites (p < 0.001) compared to patients without ascites as well as to patients with decompensated cirrhosis (p = 0.002). Conclusion: HC according to the traditional concept of high CO and low SVR is not always present in ascites. Evaluation of the CO-SVR relationship according to the severity of ascites shows a shift to the left, suggesting that the presence of HC would be defined by this shift, independent of absolute values.

Baveno VII - Renewing consensus in portal hypertension.

To expand on the work of previous meetings, a virtual Baveno VII workshop was organised for October 2021. Among patients with compensated cirrhosis or compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD - defined at the Baveno VI conference), the presence or absence of clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) is associated with differing outcomes, including risk of death, and different diagnostic and therapeutic needs. Accordingly, the Baveno VII workshop was entitled "Personalized Care for Portal Hypertension". The main fields of discussion were the relevance and indications for measuring the hepatic venous pressure gradient as a gold standard, the use of non-invasive tools for the diagnosis of cACLD and CSPH, the impact of aetiological and non-aetiological therapies on the course of cirrhosis, the prevention of the first episode of decompensation, the management of an acute bleeding episode, the prevention of further decompensation, as well as the diagnosis and management of splanchnic vein thrombosis and other vascular disorders of the liver. For each of these 9 topics, a thorough review of the medical literature was performed, and a series of consensus statements/recommendations were discussed and agreed upon. A summary of the most important conclusions/recommendations derived from the workshop is reported here. The statements are classified as unchanged, changed, and new in relation to Baveno VI.

Protective Effects of Statin Therapy in Cirrhosis Are Limited by a Common SLCO1B1 Transporter Variant.

Complications of cirrhosis and portal hypertension (PH) can be reduced by statin therapy. The common loss-of-function variant p.V174A in the solute carrier organic anion transporter gene 1B1 (SLCO1B1) gene encoding the organic anion transporting polypeptide 1B1 results in decreased hepatic uptake of statins. Our specific aim was to assess the impact of this variant in patients with cirrhosis and statin treatment while controlling for the stage of cirrhosis and other potential confounders with propensity score matching (PSM), availing of a large cohort of genotyped study patients. In total, from 1,088 patients with cirrhosis in two German academic medical centers, PSM yielded 154 patients taking statins and 154 matched controls. The effect on PH was assessed by the liver stiffness-spleen size-to-platelet score (LSPS), and complications of cirrhosis were retrospectively recorded applying consensus criteria. As hypothesized, patients on statin treatment presented less frequently with signs of PH: Esophageal varices (41% vs. 62%; P < 0.001) were less common, and LSPS (4.8 ± 11.5 vs. 5.6 ± 6.4; P = 0.01) was reduced. Correspondingly, decompensation events were also reduced in patients on statins (odds ratio [OR] = 0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32-0.90; P = 0.02). When the variant in SLCO1B1 was present in patients on statins, esophageal varices (OR = 2.68, 95% CI 1.24-5.81; P = 0.01) and bacterial infections (OR = 2.50, 95% CI 1.14-5.47; P = 0.02) were more common as compared with wild type carriers on statins. Conclusion: In this cohort, signs and complications of PH were reduced in patients with cirrhosis treated with statins. Notably, this effect was diminished by the common loss-of-function variant in SLCO1B1. Further prospective studies in independent cohorts are warranted to confirm these genotype-specific observations.

[Cirrhosis]. / Leberzirrhose.

The review summarizes the management and therapy of cirrhosis. Special focus is made on the complications of cirrhosis, like variceal bleeding, ascites, renal failure and hepatic encephalopathy.

Isolated bacterial infection without decompensation has no impact on survival of compensated patients with cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Bacterial infections (BI) affect the natural course of cirrhosis and were suggested to be a landmark event marking the transition to the decompensated stage. Our specific aim was to evaluate the impact of BI on the natural history of compensated cirrhosis. METHODS: We analyzed 858 patients with cirrhosis, evaluated for the INCA trial (EudraCT 2013-001626-26) in 2 academic medical centers between February 2014 and May 2019. Only patients with previously compensated disease were included. They were divided into 4 groups: compensated without BI, compensated with BI, 1st decompensation without BI, and 1st decompensation with BI. RESULTS: About 425 patients (median 61 [53-69] years) were included in the final prospective analysis. At baseline, 257 patients were compensated (12 [4.7%] with BI), whereas 168 patients presented with their 1st decompensation (42 [25.0%] with BI). In patients who remained compensated MELD scores were similar in those with and without BI. Patients with their first decompensation and BI had higher MELD scores than those without BI. Amongst patients who remained compensated, BI had no influence on transplant-free survival, whereas patients with their 1st decompensation and concurrent BI had significantly reduced transplant-free survival as compared with those without BI. The development of BI or decompensation during follow-up had a greater impact on survival than each of these complications at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: In compensated patients with cirrhosis, the 1st decompensation associated to BI has worse survival than decompensation without BI. By contrast, BI without decompensation does not negatively impact survival of patients with compensated cirrhosis.

Effect of ET-A blockade on portal pressure and hepatic arterial perfusion in patients with cirrhosis: A proof of concept study.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Endothelin causes vasoconstriction via the endothelin-A receptor (ET-A) in the intrahepatic circulation in cirrhosis and its increase leads to portal hypertension. The aim of the study was to investigate the acute effect of a selective ET-A antagonist in patients with portal hypertension and cirrhosis. METHODS: Proof-of-concept study with two different substudies: (a) local intrahepatic administration of the ET-A antagonist BQ 123 and (b) systemic oral administration of the ET-A antagonist Ambrisentan. Portal pressure was determined by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG, both substudies) and hepatic arterial blood flow (HABF) by intra-arterial Doppler measurements (substudy 1) before and under the ET-A antagonist. Systemic haemodynamic parameters were measured in substudy 2. RESULTS: Twelve patients (Child-Pugh [CP] B/C n = 7/5) were included in substudy 1 and 14 patients (CP A/B/C n = 4/6/4) in substudy 2. The relative decrease in HVPG was -12.5% (IQR: -40% to 0%; P = .05) in substudy 1 and -5.0% (IQR: -11.5% to 0%; P = .01) in substudy 2. Substudy 1 revealed higher decrease in HVPG in CP B patients. HABF increased significantly and patients without portal pressure decrease showed a higher increase of HABF. Substudy 2 showed a slight decrease in the mean arterial pressure without changes of other systemic haemodynamic parameters. CONCLUSION: Administration of a selective ET-A antagonist decreases the portal pressure in cirrhotic patients. This decrease was higher in CP B patients and the non-responders showed a higher increase in hepatic arterial flow. Selective ET-A antagonists might be a future treatment option in patients with portal hypertension.