Effectiveness of olfactory rehabilitation according to a structured protocol with potential of regaining pre-operative levels in laryngectomy patients using nasal airflow-inducing manoeuvre.

This pilot study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the Nasal Airflow-Inducing Manoeuvre (NAIM) when employing a structured protocol as well as investigate if early rehabilitation has the potential to return olfaction to pre-operative levels in patients undergoing laryngectomy following laryngeal cancer. Prospective study of cases conducted during 1 year, 2009­2010, at the Department of Ear-, Nose and Throat at Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden. Ten patients with laryngeal cancer and about to undergo laryngectomy were identified, of which four were included in the study. The remaining six patients were unfit to participate (n = 4) or declined participation (n = 2). Testing was conducted pre- and post-operatively and at each NAIM training session. Patients received three initial NAIM sessions followed by reinforcement training at 3, 6 and 12 months. Measures included Scandinavian Odour-Identification Test (SOIT), a semi-structured interview and questionnaires including European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, QLQ-C30 and QLQ-H&N35. All patients were normosmic smellers according to SOIT at the study end-point. One patient reported higher SOIT scores at 12 months follow-up compared to pre-operatively. Remaining patients had scores close to that reported pre-operatively. Using subjective measures, olfaction improved in all patients with one patient's final score surpassing pre-operative scores. By implementing a structured protocol consisting of three training sessions early following laryngectomy with additional reinforcement sessions at 3, 6 and 12 months, NAIM is effective in terms of improving smelling ability. There also appears to be potential for restoring olfaction to a patient's pre-operative level as reflected by both olfactory testing and PRO instruments. However, larger studies are needed to further explore the findings highlighted by this study.

Effects of total laryngectomy on olfactory function, health-related quality of life, and communication: a 3-year follow-up study.

BACKGROUND: As total laryngectomy results in loss of airflow through the nose, one of the adverse effects for a majority of patients is the reduced or complete loss of olfactory function. However, with the introduction of a new method, the Nasal Airflow-Inducing Maneuver (NAIM), an important technique is available for laryngectomized patients to regain the ability to smell. The purpose of the present study was to assess changes in olfaction, health-related quality of life (HRQL) and communication 3 years after NAIM rehabilitation. METHODS: 18 patients (15 men and 3 women; mean age, 71 years) who had undergone laryngectomy and NAIM rehabilitation were followed longitudinally for 3 years. For comparison an age and gender matched control group with laryngeal cancer treated with radical radiotherapy was included. Olfactory function was assessed using the Questionnaire on Odor, Taste and Appetite and the Scandinavian Odor Identification Test. HRQL was assessed by: 1) the European Organization for Research and Treatment for cancer quality of life questionnaires; and 2) the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Communication was assessed by the Swedish Self-Evaluation of Communication Experiences after Laryngeal Cancer. Descriptive statistics with 95% confidence interval were calculated according to standard procedure. Changes over time as well as tests between pairs of study patients and control patients were analyzed with the Fisher nonparametric permutation test for matched pairs. RESULTS: Thirty-six months after rehabilitation 14 of 18 laryngectomized patients (78%) were smellers. There were, with one exception (sleep disturbances), no clinically or statistically significant differences between the study and the control group considering HRQL and mental distress. However, statistical differences (p < 0.001) were found between the study and the control group concerning changes in communication. CONCLUSION: Olfactory training with NAIM should be integrated into the multidisciplinary rehabilitation program after total laryngectomy. Our study shows that patients who were successfully rehabilitated concerning olfaction and communication had an overall good HRQL and no mental distress. Moreover, the EORTC questionnaires should be complemented with more specific questionnaires when evaluating olfaction and communication in laryngectomized patients.

Development of a clinical instrument improving rehabilitation of olfaction with the Nasal Airflow-Inducing Maneuver in Swedish laryngectomized patients.

CONCLUSION: The protocol is a useful and reliable tool for evaluating the use of the Nasal Airflow-Inducing Maneuver (NAIM) in patients who have undergone total laryngectomy. It facilitates the optimization and improvement of olfactory treatment with NAIM and is sensitive to changes over time. However, further modification of the protocol is needed before a broad implementation into routine clinical practice can be recommended. OBJECTIVES: To develop and assess whether a protocol evaluating NAIM variables is sensitive and reliable to study olfactory function after total laryngectomy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Video documentation from 21 laryngectomized patients receiving olfactory rehabilitation during the study period 2002-2005 was used. The patients' execution of NAIM was evaluated using a protocol with identified NAIM variables. Olfactory acuity was tested with the Scandinavian Olfactory Identification Test (SOIT). Data from the first (baseline) and third (after treatment) intervention sessions and from follow-up at 6 and 12 months are reported. RESULTS: According to the NAIM evaluation protocol patients significantly improved their execution of the NAIM technique over time and these improvements were associated with improvements in olfactory acuity (SOIT). Using the protocol important key variables for improvement of the NAIM technique were identified. The inter- and intra-rater reliability for the NAIM evaluation protocol was moderate to good.

Effectiveness of olfactory rehabilitation with the nasal airflow-inducing maneuver after total laryngectomy: one-year follow-up study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the long-term results of the nasal airflow-inducing maneuver in olfaction rehabilitation in patients who had undergone laryngectomy. DESIGN: Prospective interventional study. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty-four patients who had undergone laryngectomy (21 men and 3 women; mean age, 68 years) who received olfactory rehabilitation with the nasal airflow-inducing maneuver were reevaluated 6 and 12 months after primary treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Olfactory function was tested by means of a semistructured interview; the Questionnaire on Olfaction, Taste and Appetite; and the Scandinavian Odor-Identification Test. Quality of life was measured with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and QLQ-H&N35 questionnaires. Patients were categorized as smellers or nonsmellers based on results of the Scandinavian Odor-Identification Test. RESULTS: Before treatment, 10 of 24 patients (42%) were smellers and 14 (58%) were nonsmellers. At 6-month follow-up, 20 of 23 patients (87%) were smellers, whereas after 12 months, 21 of 24 patients (88%) were smellers. Long-term olfaction rehabilitation was achieved in 11 of 14 patients (79%) with anosmia, and 15 of all 24 patients (63%) could be classified as having normal olfactory capacity at the end of the study. CONCLUSION: The nasal airflow-inducing maneuver is a patient-friendly, inexpensive, and effective method for restoring the sense of smell in patients after laryngectomy, and the results persist in the long term.

Screening and rehabilitation of olfaction after total laryngectomy in Swedish patients: results from an intervention study using the Nasal Airflow-Inducing Maneuver.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the olfactory function in patients with laryngectomy and to assess the results of the Nasal Airflow-Inducing Maneuver (NAIM) odor-rehabilitation technique. DESIGN: A prospective intervention study. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty-four patients, 21 men and 3 women, mean age 68 years, who underwent laryngectomy at least 5 months prior to intervention. INTERVENTION: Speech therapists trained patients in the NAIM technique: simultaneous lowering of the jaw, floor of the mouth, tongue, base of the tongue, and soft palate while the lips are closed. Three interventions were given within 6 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Olfactory testing with semistructured interview, the Questionnaire on Olfaction, Taste, and Appetite (QOTA), and the Scandinavian Odor-Identification Test (SOIT). Quality of life was measured with European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and QLQ-H&N35 questionnaires. The patients were categorized as smellers or nonsmellers based on the SOIT results. RESULTS: Before the treatment, 10 patients (42%) were smellers (ie, 6 had normosmia and 4 hyposmia), while 14 patients (58%) were nonsmellers (ie, all had anosmia). Thus, 18 patients had impaired olfaction. Using the NAIM technique, 13 (72%) of 18 patients with impaired olfaction showed improvement. Of the 14 nonsmellers, 7 converted to smellers after only 1 intervention session, giving us a success rate of 50% in anosmic patients after 1 session. CONCLUSIONS: Olfactory impairment is common in patients who underwent laryngectomy. The NAIM method is easy to learn and rapidly improves smell and taste. A single intervention session is sometimes sufficient, but many patients benefit from repeated training. The SOIT test is an effective and simple test for the assessment of olfaction acuity after laryngectomy.