Differentiation of benign and malignant vertebral fractures using a convolutional neural network to extract CT-based texture features.

PURPOSE: To assess the diagnostic performance of three-dimensional (3D) CT-based texture features (TFs) using a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based framework to differentiate benign (osteoporotic) and malignant vertebral fractures (VFs). METHODS: A total of 409 patients who underwent routine thoracolumbar spine CT at two institutions were included. VFs were categorized as benign or malignant using either biopsy or imaging follow-up of at least three months as standard of reference. Automated detection, labelling, and segmentation of the vertebrae were performed using a CNN-based framework ( https://anduin.bonescreen.de ). Eight TFs were extracted: Varianceglobal, Skewnessglobal, energy, entropy, short-run emphasis (SRE), long-run emphasis (LRE), run-length non-uniformity (RLN), and run percentage (RP). Multivariate regression models adjusted for age and sex were used to compare TFs between benign and malignant VFs. RESULTS: Skewnessglobal showed a significant difference between the two groups when analyzing fractured vertebrae from T1 to L6 (benign fracture group: 0.70 [0.64-0.76]; malignant fracture group: 0.59 [0.56-0.63]; and p = 0.017), suggesting a higher skewness in benign VFs compared to malignant VFs. CONCLUSION: Three-dimensional CT-based global TF skewness assessed using a CNN-based framework showed significant difference between benign and malignant thoracolumbar VFs and may therefore contribute to the clinical diagnostic work-up of patients with VFs.

Automated Opportunistic Trabecular Volumetric Bone Mineral Density Extraction Outperforms Manual Measurements for the Prediction of Vertebral Fractures in Routine CT.

Opportunistic osteoporosis screening using multidetector CT-scans (MDCT) and convolutional neural network (CNN)-derived segmentations of the spine to generate volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) bears the potential to improve incidental osteoporotic vertebral fracture (VF) prediction. However, the performance compared to the established manual opportunistic vBMD measures remains unclear. Hence, we investigated patients with a routine MDCT of the spine who had developed a new osteoporotic incidental VF and frequency matched to patients without incidental VFs as assessed on follow-up MDCT images after 1.5 years. Automated vBMD was generated using CNN-generated segmentation masks and asynchronous calibration. Additionally, manual vBMD was sampled by two radiologists. Automated vBMD measurements in patients with incidental VFs at 1.5-years follow-up (n = 53) were significantly lower compared to patients without incidental VFs (n = 104) (83.6 ± 29.4 mg/cm3 vs. 102.1 ± 27.7 mg/cm3, p < 0.001). This comparison was not significant for manually assessed vBMD (99.2 ± 37.6 mg/cm3 vs. 107.9 ± 33.9 mg/cm3, p = 0.30). When adjusting for age and sex, both automated and manual vBMD measurements were significantly associated with incidental VFs at 1.5-year follow-up, however, the associations were stronger for automated measurements (ß = -0.32; 95% confidence interval (CI): -20.10, 4.35; p < 0.001) compared to manual measurements (ß = -0.15; 95% CI: -11.16, 5.16; p < 0.03). In conclusion, automated opportunistic measurements are feasible and can be useful for bone mineral density assessment in clinical routine.

Development and Evaluation of MR-Based Radiogenomic Models to Differentiate Atypical Lipomatous Tumors from Lipomas.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to develop and validate radiogenomic models to predict the MDM2 gene amplification status and differentiate between ALTs and lipomas on preoperative MR images. METHODS: MR images were obtained in 257 patients diagnosed with ALTs (n = 65) or lipomas (n = 192) using histology and the MDM2 gene analysis as a reference standard. The protocols included T2-, T1-, and fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced T1-weighted sequences. Additionally, 50 patients were obtained from a different hospital for external testing. Radiomic features were selected using mRMR. Using repeated nested cross-validation, the machine-learning models were trained on radiomic features and demographic information. For comparison, the external test set was evaluated by three radiology residents and one attending radiologist. RESULTS: A LASSO classifier trained on radiomic features from all sequences performed best, with an AUC of 0.88, 70% sensitivity, 81% specificity, and 76% accuracy. In comparison, the radiology residents achieved 60-70% accuracy, 55-80% sensitivity, and 63-77% specificity, while the attending radiologist achieved 90% accuracy, 96% sensitivity, and 87% specificity. CONCLUSION: A radiogenomic model combining features from multiple MR sequences showed the best performance in predicting the MDM2 gene amplification status. The model showed a higher accuracy compared to the radiology residents, though lower compared to the attending radiologist.