Electrochemotherapy with intravenous bleomycin in the local treatment of skin melanoma metastases.

BACKGROUND: Electrochemotherapy (ECT) combines chemotherapy and electroporation to increase drug uptake. Its role in cutaneous melanoma metastasis treatment is not well defined; indeed, few studies have been reported, without complete follow-up data. AIM: To prospectively evaluate clinical activity and tolerability of ECT with i.v. bleomycin, and to analyze the response increase associated to repeated sessions, in the largest series of cutaneous melanoma metastases reported to date (n = 233). PATIENTS AND METHODS: 14 stage III relapsed/refractory patients were enrolled according to European Standard Operating Procedures of Electrochemotherapy (ESOPE) guidelines and treated under general sedation using the Cliniporator(TM) pulse generator. RESULTS: A response was obtained in 13/14 patients (93%) after the first ECT, with a complete regression (CR) in 7 (50%). Seven patients underwent a second and three a third ECT on newly appearing and residual lesions, all achieving a response. Overall, a response was obtained in 93% metastases, with lower response rates in >1 cm(2) lesions. The CR rate was 58%; none of the CR nodules relapsed. The repeated ECT sessions gave rise to a new response in 21/29 (72%) re-treated lesions. The local tumor control rate was 74.5% at 2 years. CONCLUSION: ECT is a safe procedure, easily performed in terms of toxicities and cost-effectiveness ratios, and constitutes a therapeutic tool for relapsed/refractory cutaneous melanoma patients. The repeated ECT sessions are associated with a response increase in re-treated lesions which could allow to overcome the reduced activity in >1 cm(2) sized metastases.

Instruments and accessories for diagnostic endoscopic ultrasound (radial scanning and miniprobes).

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is a relatively new technology developed in the early 80's, but introduced into the clinical practice only in the late 80's. Nowadays there is an increase in demand for EUS examinations and services, because this technique is more and more recognized as an important and integral part in the diagnostic and staging algorithm of many gastrointestinal (GI) and nongastrointestinal pathologies. Even if today the EUS panorama enrich itself with a large number of different instruments, mechanical and electronic scopes, radial and linear ones, several types of miniprobes and specialty probes, for diagnostic purposes the dedicated radial scanning instruments remain the more adopted choice while miniprobes can have applications only in niche areas, like superficial GI cancers staging, small subepithelial lesions evaluation or intraductal ultrasound and some technological advances are needed to solve the potential drawbacks of this miniaturized probes. At last the EUS equipment borrowed most of the electronic sophistication from the mainstream ultrasonography, this made the choice of an EUS instrument even more difficult and challenging, but you must consider that there is no right or wrong equipment, there is only the right instrument for that specific clinical need or situation.