Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Urol ; 196(1): 202-6, 2016 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26874316

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Pediatric tissues are exquisitely sensitive to ionizing radiation from diagnostic studies and therapies involving fluoroscopy. We prospectively monitored radiation exposure in our pediatric urology patients during fluoroscopy guided operative procedures with single point dosimeters to quantify radiation dose. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Children undergoing fluoroscopy guided urological procedures were prospectively enrolled in the study from 2013 to 2015. Single point dosimeters were affixed to skin overlying the procedural site for the durations of the procedures to record dosimetry data. Patient demographics, procedural variables and fluoroscopic settings were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 78 patients underwent 96 procedures, including retrograde pyelography, ureteral stent insertion, ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Median patient age was 12 years (range 0.3 to 17) and median body mass index percentile for age was 70.7 (1.0 to 99.1). Median skin entrance radiation dose for all procedures performed was 0.56 mGy. Median dosages associated with the 29 diagnostic procedures and 49 definitive interventions were 0.6 mGy (mean 0.8, range 0.1 to 2.2) and 0.7 mGy (1.1, 0.0 to 5.5), respectively. The dose associated with the 18 procedures of temporization was significantly higher by comparison (median 1.0 mGy, mean 2.6, range 0.1 to 10.7, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric radiation exposure is not insignificant during urological procedures. Further multi-institutional work would provide context for our findings. Protocols to optimize fluoroscopic settings and minimize patient exposure, and guidelines for radiation based imaging should have a key role in all pediatric radiation safety initiatives.


Assuntos
Técnicas de Diagnóstico Urológico , Segurança do Paciente , Doses de Radiação , Exposição à Radiação , Monitoramento de Radiação , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Fluoroscopia , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Pediatria , Estudos Prospectivos , Urologia
2.
J Pediatr Urol ; 11(6): 339.e1-5, 2015 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26619794

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Despite the increasing incidence of pediatric nephrolithiasis, there is little data quantifying the radiation exposure associated with treatment of this disease. In this study, pediatric patients with nephrolithiasis who were managed at a single institution were identified, and the average fluoroscopy time and estimated radiation exposure associated with their procedures were reported. METHODS: Stone procedures performed on pediatric patients between 2005 and 2012 were retrospectively identified. Procedures were classified as primary ureteroscopy (URS), stent placement prior to ureteroscopy (SURS), percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), and bilateral ureteroscopy (BLURS). Patient demographic information, stone size, stone location, number of radiographic images, and fluoroscopy times were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 152 stone procedures were included in the final analysis (92 URS, 38 SURS, eight BLURS and 14 PCNL). Mean patient age at time of stone treatment was 15.94 ± 4.1 years. Median fluoroscopy times were 1.6 (IQR 0.8-2.4), 2.1 (IQR 1.6-3.0), 2.5 (IQR 2.0-2.9), and 11.7 (IQR 5.0-18.5) minutes for URS, SURS, BLURS and PCNL, respectively. There was a moderate correlation between stone size and fluoroscopy time (r = 0.33). When compared with ureteroscopic procedures, PCNL was associated with a significantly higher fluoroscopy time (11.7 vs 2.1 min, P < 0.001). The estimated median effective dose was 3 mSv for ureteroscopic procedures and 16.8 mSv for PCNL. In addition to radiation exposure during treatment, patients in this cohort were exposed to an average of one (IQR1-3) CT scan and three (IQR 1-8) abdominal X-rays. No new malignancies were identified during the limited follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Radiation exposure during treatment of pediatric stone disease is not trivial, and is significantly greater when PCNL is performed. Given the recommended maximum effective dose of 50 mSv in any one year, urologists should closely monitor the amount of fluoroscopy used, and consider the potential for radiation exposure when choosing the operative approach. Prospective studies are currently underway to elucidate precise dose measurements and localize sites of radiation exposure in children during stone treatment.


Assuntos
Fluoroscopia , Nefrolitíase/cirurgia , Nefrostomia Percutânea , Exposição à Radiação/estatística & dados numéricos , Ureteroscopia , Adolescente , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...