Nutrient intakes during diets including unkilned and large amounts of oats in celiac disease.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: We have shown earlier that consumption of moderate amount of oats improve intakes of vitamin B(1), fiber, magnesium and iron in celiac patients using gluten-free diet (GFD). The objective of this study was to clarify the effect of high amount of both kilned and unkilned oats on food and nutrient intakes in celiac patients in remission. Kilning as an industrial heating process is performed to preserve the main properties of oats and to lengthen its useableness. Kilning may, however, change the protein structure of oats and therefore influence on the intake of nutrients. SUBJECTS/METHODS: The study group consisted of 13 men and 18 women with celiac disease in remission. The patients who were earlier using moderate amount of oats as part of their GFD were randomized to consume kilned or unkilned oats. After 6 months, the patients changed the treatment groups. The goal of daily intake of oats was 100 g. Food records and frequency questionnaire were used to follow nutrient intakes. RESULTS: Type of oats did not affect the amount of oats used. In the group using kilned oats, the intake of vitamin B1 and magnesium and in the group of unkilned oats that of magnesium and zinc increased significantly during the first 6 months (P

Cardiac autonomic regulation during gastroscopy.

BACKGROUND: Gastroscopy is sometimes associated with adverse cardiovascular events. AIMS: We evaluated the effects of sedation and pharyngeal anaesthesia on cardiac autonomic regulation during gastroscopy. PATIENTS: Two hundred thirteen outpatients undergoing gastroscopy. METHODS: The patients were assigned to 4 groups: (1) sedation with intravenous midazolam and placebo throat spray (midazolam group), (2) placebo sedation and pharyngeal anaesthesia with lidocaine (lidocaine group), (3) placebo sedation and placebo throat spray (placebo group), and (4) no intravenous cannula nor throat spray (control group). Continuous electrocardiogram was recorded. Heart rate variability was assessed; the powers of low frequency (0.04-0.15 Hz) and high frequency (0.15-0.40 Hz) components as well as total power (0.0-0.4 Hz) were calculated. RESULTS: Gastroscopy was associated with a decrease in high frequency normalized units, increases in low frequency normalized units and low frequency/high frequency ratio indicating activation of sympathetic and withdrawal of vagal modulation. Sympathetic activation resulted in a decrease in total power and all components of heart rate variability. The decrease was most prominent in the midazolam treated patients (p<0.001 vs the lidocaine group and p<0.01 vs placebo and control groups during the postendoscopy phase). CONCLUSION: Gastroscopy induces a shift towards dominance of the sympathetic modulation of the heart. Premedication with midazolam potentiates this shift.

Non-endoscopic diagnosis of atrophic gastritis with a blood test. Correlation between gastric histology and serum levels of gastrin-17 and pepsinogen I: a multicentre study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Serum levels of gastrin-17 (S-G-17) and pepsinogen I (S-PGI) are biomarkers of gastric antral and corpus mucosa, respectively. In a prospective multicentre investigation, we determined whether these tests, together with the assay of Helicobacter pylori antibodies, are a non-endoscopic tool for the diagnosis of atrophic gastritis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The series comprised 404 consecutive adult outpatients undergoing diagnostic upper-gastrointestinal endoscopy for various dyspeptic symptoms in five outpatient clinics. Gastric biopsies from the antrum and corpus (at least two biopsies from both sites) were available from all patients, and they were evaluated according to the guidelines of the updated Sydney system. S-PGI and S-G-17 were assayed with ELISA methods using monoclonal antibodies to pepsinogen I and amidated gastrin-17. In addition to the fasting level (S-G-17(fast)), a postprandial S-G-17 (S-G-17(prand)) level was measured 20 min after ingestion of a protein-rich drink. H. pylori antibodies were determined using a polyclonal EIA method. RESULTS: S-G-17(prand) (and S-G-17(fast)) and S-PGI levels decreased with increasing grade of atrophy of the antrum or corpus, respectively. S-G-17(prand) levels were significantly lower in patients with advanced (moderate or severe) atrophic antral H. pylori gastritis than in those with non-atrophic H. pylori gastritis. All patients with a resected antrum demonstrated S-G-17(prand) levels that were almost undetectable. Of the nine patients with an H. pylori-positive moderate or severe atrophic antral gastritis, six had S-G-17(prand) levels below 5 pmol/l. Similarly, S-PGI levels were significantly lower in patients with advanced corpus atrophy than in those without. Of the 45 patients with moderate or severe corpus atrophy in endoscopic biopsies, 35 patients had S-PGI levels < 25 microg/l. By using the cut-off levels for S-G-17(prand) and S-PGI with the best discrimination, the sensitivity and specificity of the blood test panel in delineation of patients with advanced atrophic gastritis (either in the antrum or the corpus, or both) were 83% and 95%, respectively. The predictive values of the positive and negative test results were 75% and 97%, respectively. In the diagnosis of atrophic gastritis, the application of S-G-17(fast) showed a slightly lower sensitivity and specificity than the application of S-G-17(prand) as a biomarker for antral atrophy. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnosis of atrophic gastritis obtained with the blood test panel of S-G-17, S-PGI and H. pylori antibodies is in good agreement with the endoscopic and biopsy findings. The panel is a tool for non-endoscopic diagnosis and screening of atrophic gastritis.

The effects of gender and age on the colonoscopic examination.

The data concerning the influence of gender and age on a patient's toleration of and the technical difficulty of colonoscopy are conflicting. One hundred eighty patients (108 women and 72 men) undergoing colonoscopy were categorized into three age groups: the young (aged 2040 years), the middle-aged (aged 41-60 years), and the old (aged 61-75 years). The endoscopists assessed the examination immediately after the procedure. The patients completed a questionnaire before leaving the endoscopy unit and again 2 weeks later. The women rated colonoscopy after the procedure more painful (p < 0.01) and in the repeat questionnaire more painful (p < 0.05) and more difficult (p < 0.05) than men. Also, the endoscopists judged colonoscopy to be more difficult (p < 0.001) and the time taken to reach cecum longer (p < 0.01) for women. The young experienced more discomfort than the middle-aged or the old, as evaluated after the procedure (p < 0.05). In the repeat questionnaire, the young reported more discomfort and pain than the middle-aged (p < 0.05). The endoscopists also judged the examination to be more difficult and the time taken to intubate cecum longer for the old than for the middle-aged (p < 0.05) or the young (p < 0.01). Correspondingly, the examination time was shorter among the young when compared with the middle-aged (p < 0.05) or the old (p < 0.001). The young were least willing to repeat the examination (p < 0.05). Colonoscopy is less tolerable and more difficult for women. Although colonoscopy among the old patients was technically more difficult, they tolerated the procedure better than the young.

Effect of conscious sedation on cardiac autonomic regulation during colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy is associated with cardiovascular events including hypotension, hypertension, and myocardial ischemia. The pathogenetic mechanisms of these cardiovascular events are unknown, but there is evidence that the autonomic nervous system may play a role. Conscious sedation is often used to relieve the inconvenience caused by the procedure. In this study, we evaluated the effects of sedation on cardiac autonomic regulation during colonoscopy. METHODS: One hundred and eighty patients undergoing elective colonoscopy were prospectively randomized into three groups: (i) sedation with intravenous midazolam (midazolam group); (ii) sedation with intravenous saline (placebo group); and (iii) no intravenous cannula (control group). Continuous electrocardiogram was recorded prior to, during, and after the colonoscopic procedure. Heart rate variability (HRV) was assessed by means of the power spectral analysis; the powers of low-frequency (LF 0.04-0.15 Hz) and high-frequency (HF 0.15-0.40 Hz) components were calculated. RESULTS: Intubation of the colonoscope increased the LF component of HRV and decreased HF power in all study groups compared to baseline recording. Furthermore, compared to baseline, the LF/HF ratio--a marker of cardiac sympathetic regulation--increased during intubation in the midazolam (P < 0.001) and placebo (P < 0.05) groups, with no change in the control group. During intubation the midazolam group presented with higher LF and lower HF power than placebo (P < 0.001) and control groups (P < 0.01). Accordingly, the LF/HF ratio was higher in the midazolam group than in the placebo (P < 0.05) or control groups (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Midazolam potentiates the dominance of the sympathetic nervous system induced by colonoscopy. Therefore, conscious sedation with midazolam may contribute to the occurrence of cardiovascular events during colonoscopy.

Conscious sedation and cardiorespiratory safety during colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND: Cardiorespiratory events during colonoscopy are common. The effect of sedative premedication on cardiorespiratory parameters during colonoscopy has not been studied in controlled, prospective trials. METHODS: One hundred eighty patients undergoing colonoscopy were divided into 3 groups: (1) sedation with intravenous midazolam (midazolam group); (2) sedation with intravenous saline (placebo group); and (3) no intravenous cannula (control group). Arterial oxygen saturation (SaO(2)), systolic and diastolic blood pressure and continuous electrocardiogram were recorded prior to, during and after the endoscopic procedure. RESULTS: Midazolam produced lower SaO(2) values during colonoscopy compared with placebo or control groups (p < 0.001, repeated measures analysis of variance). Systolic and diastolic blood pressure during colonoscopy were lower in the midazolam group than in the placebo group (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively), but no difference was found between the midazolam and the control groups. Hypotension (systolic blood pressure less than 100 mm Hg) occurred more frequently in the midazolam group (19%) than in the placebo (3%; p < 0.01) or control groups (7%; p < 0.05). ST-segment depression developed in 7% of patients during the recording with no difference between the groups. In 75% of cases ST-depression appeared prior to the endoscopic procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Premedication with midazolam induced a statistically significant decrease in arterial oxygen saturation and increased the risk for hypotension. However, colonoscopy proved to be a safe procedure both with and without sedation.

Is routinely given conscious sedation of benefit during colonoscopy?

BACKGROUND: Sedative drugs are generally given to patients undergoing colonoscopy. However, the benefit of routinely administered conscious sedation for colonoscopy has not been studied in adequately controlled trials. METHODS: We randomly assigned 180 patients scheduled for diagnostic colonoscopy into 3 groups: (1) sedation with intravenous midazolam (midazolam group); (2) sedation with intravenous saline (placebo group); and (3) no intravenous cannula (control group). The endoscopist assessed the procedure immediately after the examination. The patients completed a questionnaire before leaving the endoscopy unit. Another questionnaire was sent to the patients 2 weeks after the examination. Answers were mainly given on a 100 mm visual analog scale. RESULTS: Shortly after the procedure, the patients in the midazolam group rated the examination less difficult than those in the placebo group (30 vs. 40 mm; p < 0.05; visual analog scale, 0 to 100 mm: 0 = not at all, 100 = extremely). However, no significant difference was found between midazolam and control groups (30 vs. 36 mm, respectively). Otherwise, there were no differences between the three groups with respect to the patients' or endoscopists' assessments or the examination time. CONCLUSIONS: Routinely administered sedation does not markedly increase patient tolerance or make colonoscopy technically easier.

Multivariate analysis of operative mortality and late outcome after coronary bypass surgery.

A multivariate discriminant analysis was made to find out the variables that could offer the greatest amount of predictive power on the long term results after myocardial revascularization. A total of 202 consecutive patients who underwent CABG operation in 1981 were reviewed 5 years later. Most of the patients (76.5%) had 3-vessel disease, previous AMI (70.2%), hypertriglyceridemia (61.7%), positive family history of CAD (68.0%) elevated blood cholesterol level (48.1%), hypertension (41.9%) or were smokers (61.9%). In 48.1% of the cases IMA was used for revascularization and in the rest saphenous vein graft alone. The 5-year survival of the entire group was 87%. The late mortality was related to 3 independent variables in multivariate analysis: 1) positive family history of CAD (p less than 0.05), 2) preoperative ejection fraction less than 0.30 (p less than 0.01) and 3) revascularization without IMA (p less than 0.02). The vast majority of patients (70%) had a better NYHA class 5 years postoperatively (the 95% confidence interval was 65-77%). These patients had experienced an average improvement of 2.0 NYHA categories. Eight per cent of patients had an unaltered and 5% a worse NYHA class than preoperatively. When the patients were grouped into those having a better NYHA class and into those who had an unchanged or worse NYHA class or who had died from CAD the only variable which was associated with poorer outcome appeared to be positive family history of CAD (p less than 0.01). It can be concluded that hereditary factors, utilization of internal mammary artery in revascularization and preoperative ejection fraction are the major predictors of late outcome after CABG.