The Number of Pills, Rather Than the Type of Renin-Angiotensin System Inhibitor, Predicts Ambulatory Blood Pressure Control in Essential Hypertensives on Triple Therapy: A Real-Life Cross-Sectional Study.

INTRODUCTION: We evaluated the prevalence and predictors of ambulatory blood pressure (BP) control in patients taking a triple antihypertensive therapy (renin-angiotensin system inhibitor + calcium channel blocker + thiazide/thiazide-like diuretic, in either free or fixed-dose combinations) containing an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) or an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB). METHODS: We performed an observational cross-sectional study on 520 consecutive patients with essential hypertension taking a stable triple therapy in whom 24-h ambulatory BP was evaluated. Both number of pills and antihypertensive treatment intensity (ATI), as possible pharmacological predictors of ambulatory BP control, were taken into account. RESULTS: A total of 189 (36.3%) patients were taking triple therapy with ACEi and 331 (63.7%) patients were taking triple therapy with ARB. Mean age was 62.7 ± 12.2 years. Patients on triple therapy with ACEi had a significantly lower ATI and took fewer antihypertensive pills than patients on triple therapy with ARB (22.2% of patients took a single-pill triple fixed-dose combination). Patients taking triple therapy with ACEi had higher prevalence of both 24-h (54.8% vs 44.0%; p = 0.019) and daytime BP control (61.8% vs 49.2%; p = 0.006) than patients taking triple therapy with ARB, even after adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, smoking habit, type 2 diabetes mellitus, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and ATI [OR 1.5 (95% CI 1.1-2.2) and OR 1.6 (95% CI 1.1-2.4), respectively]. However, these independent associations with ambulatory BP control were lost when the number of antihypertensive pills was included in the model. CONCLUSION: The higher prevalence of ambulatory BP control found in patients taking a triple therapy with ACEi was affected by the lower number of antihypertensive pills taken, which was also the key predictor of ambulatory BP control in our study. This confirms the importance of fixed-dose combinations in the management of essential hypertension.

A 95-year-old patient with unexpected coronavirus disease 2019 masked by aspiration pneumonia: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 infection has become a pandemic disease (coronavirus disease 2019). The infection has moved from China to the rest of the world and Italy represents one of the most affected countries. Older adults are more susceptible to develop complications with the consequent highest mortality rates. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a case of a 95-year-old Caucasian woman affected by pneumonia, initially defined as common aspiration pneumonia in a bedridden patient with vascular dementia, which later turned out to be coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia during the initial spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 in our district. Some features of a computed tomography scan of her chest and her clinical history with known dysphagia had led at first to a different diagnosis with a consequent exposure of health professionals to infectious risk in two distinct hospitals. In this case report, we describe the clinical/imaging features of coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia and the diagnostic process that led to a correct diagnosis in a nonagenarian with multiple comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: This case report highlights both the possible pitfalls in diagnosing coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia in very old patients with comorbidities and the greater than expected spread of the infection, even in individuals with reduced interpersonal contacts and no defined epidemiological link.

Prevalence of Subclinical Carotid Atherosclerosis and Role of Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Older Adults: Atherosclerosis and Aging are Not Synonyms.

INTRODUCTION: Age is traditionally considered a major cardiovascular (CV) risk factor, but its real weight in the absence of other modifiable risk factors is not clear. AIM: To compare the prevalence of subclinical carotid atherosclerosis, and its association with the main CV risk factors, between older adults and hypertensive adults. METHODS: Cross-sectional study on 210 consecutive patients: 70 older adults (age ≥ 80 years), and 140 hypertensive adults having at least another CV risk factor. Patients had no history of peripheral artery disease or major CV events. RESULTS: Mean age was 54.2 ± 7.2 years in hypertensive adults and 88.5 ± 5.5 years in older adults with a female prevalence in the latter group. Dyslipidemia and smoking were more prevalent in hypertensive adults, while chronic kidney disease was more prevalent in older adults. Prevalence of carotid plaques did not differ between hypertensive adults and older adults (48.2% vs 55.6%, respectively, p = 0.311). Age ≥ 80 years was not associated with a higher risk of carotid plaques even after adjusting for other risk factors (p = 0.204). Hypertension and dyslipidemia were the risk factors more strongly associated with carotid plaques in older adults and hypertensive adults, respectively. When older adults with hypertension were excluded from the analysis, prevalence of carotid plaques was significantly higher in hypertensive adults (p = 0.042). CONCLUSION: Hypertension and dyslipidemia are the major determinant of atherosclerosis regardless of age in our study. Our findings support the concept that aging is not necessarily synonymous with atherosclerosis and highlight the key role played by superimposed CV risk factors on arterial ''bad aging''.