Performance of beef cows receiving cull beans, sunflower meal, and canola meal as protein supplements while grazing native winter range in Eastern Colorado.

A 2-yr grazing performance study was conducted in Eastern Colorado to evaluate the effects of feeding raw cull beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) or canola meal, compared to sunflower meal, to beef cows grazing dormant, native winter range on body weight and body condition score (BCS) change, reproductive performance, and calf performance. Ninety-five pregnant, spring-calving crossbred cows (541 +/- 51 kg) in 1995 to 1996 and 65 cows (602 +/- 60 kg) in 1996 to 1997 were randomly assigned to one of five treatments (19 and 13 cows per treatment in 1995 to 1996 and 1996 to 1997, respectively): 1) unprocessed Great Northern beans to supply 182 g/d of CP (GNB); 2) canola meal to supply 182 g/d of CP (CM); 3) a mixture of Great Northern beans and sunflower meal, each to supply 91 g/d of CP, for a total of 182 g/d of CP (MIX); 4) sunflower meal to supply 182 g/d of CP (SFM+); and 5) sunflower meal to supply 91 g/d of CP (SFM-). Cow weight and body condition performance were broken into a gestation and a lactation phase in 1995 to 1996; calves were weighed at birth, at the end of the lactation phase in April, and at weaning the following September. Only gestation performance was monitored in 1996 to 1997, and subsequent calf birth and weaning weight were recorded. The SFM- group lost more weight during the gestation phase than other treatments (P < .05), yet no differences were detected for gestation phase daily BCS change, calf birth weight, lactation phase daily weight change, lactation phase daily BCS change, first-service conception rate to AI, or overall pregnancy rate. Off-test calf weight was higher in April for calves from dams of the SFM+ and CM treatments than for calves from dams on the GNB or SFM- treatments (P < .05), and calves from cows on the CM treatment were heavier in April than calves from cows on the MIX treatment (P < .05). No differences in calf weight were present at weaning. Consumption of beans by cows on the GNB treatment was low because of palatability problems. Mixing the beans with sunflower meal in the MIX treatment eliminated this problem. Canola meal, Great Northern beans, or a combination of sunflower meal and Great Northern beans were comparable to sunflower meal as protein supplements for beef cows grazing native winter range, despite obvious palatability problems with the beans.

Grazing and Plant Performance.

Grazing is more than just defoliation of plants. The impact of herbivory affects ecosystem structure and function, both above and below ground. Ultimately, effects of herbivory are expressed to varying degrees at many levels of the ecosystem. Herbivory has been shown to affect plant physiology, morphology, and genetics. Plants have evolved many ways to avoid or tolerate herbivory. Whether plant overcompensate, equally compensate, or undercompensate to herbivory depends on pre- and post-harvest conditions of the plants and their environment. To be important to the manager, the magnitude of compensation must be greater than the inherent "noise" in the system. Natural resources managers use scientific information about herbivory to reduce ambiguity in decision-making in an environment of uncertainty. If an ecological response like compensation is to have practical application for the manager, the meaningful effects must occur on time and spatial scales that the manager can respond to with available resources.

A model of thermal acclimation in cattle.

A model of temperature effects on cattle daily feed intake has been developed that takes into account (1) time course of thermal acclimation and (2) behavioral responses to short-term thermal stress (STTS). The key difference between this model and the classical intake-temperature model is its consideration of the acclimation state of the animal. Time course of physiological acclimation is represented by a running average temperature. The STTS is defined as the difference between the current acclimated temperature [Tacci(L)] and current daily mean temperature (Ti). Ruminants were postulated as decreasing activity in response to STTS. An empirical relationship between daily feed intake (I) and environmental temperature was derived as: I = 100% - b'[Ti - Tacci(L)]2. Length of the acclimation period, L, and value of the behavioral response coefficient, b', were determined for grazing time of free-roaming cattle and feed intake of five breeds of feedlot cattle. Cattle breeds displayed apparent differences in L but no significant differences in b'. Feeding situation (feedlot vs free-roaming) had a significant effect on b' in cattle, but not on L. Because of explicit treatment of acclimation and stress, two-dimensional representation of thermal environment may be a more meaningful expression of effective environmental temperature in fluctuating environments than mean daily temperature alone. This model may have value in the interpretation of laboratory studies, as well as field studies, because the time frame of experiments will influence the results obtained, depending upon the acclimation state of the animal.