Spironolactone in Post-Transplant Proteinuria: A Safe Alternative Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Aldosterone is involved in the process of renal allograft fibrosis, clinically manifest by proteinuria and allograft dysfunction, with increased risk for cardiovascular death. The treatment with aldosterone antagonists appears to be effective in controlling proteinuria, with a protective effect on progression of renal fibrosis. METHODS: This retrospective, cohort study included kidney transplant recipients from January 1993 to June 2015. Inclusion criteria were persistent proteinuria >0.5 g/d, longer than 6 months, and spironolactone therapy. RESULTS: One hundred forty transplant recipients fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were divided into 3 groups, according to proteinuria levels at the beginning of spironolactone therapy: low (<1 g/24 h), intermediate (1-3 g/24 h), and nephrotic (>3 g/24 h). Groups were comparable in demographic data, with a higher incidence of living related donors in the nephrotic group. In patients with proteinuria ≥1 g/d, we observed a significant reduction in proteinuria after 6 months of therapy that persisted over time. Blood pressure and glomerular filtration rate persisted stable over time. Adverse events were not severe to withdrawal therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Spironolactone can be a safe alternative to control post-transplant proteinuria, especially in patients with mild to moderate allograft dysfunction with proteinuria ≥1 g/day.

Urinary tract infection in renal transplant recipients: incidence, risk factors, and impact on graft function.

INTRODUCTION: Urinary tract infection (UTI) is the most common infection posttransplant. However, the risk factors for and the impact of UTIs remain controversial. The aim of this study was to identify the incidence of posttransplant UTIs in a series of renal transplant recipients from deceased donors. Secondary objectives were to identify: (1) the most frequent infectious agents; (2) risk factors related to donor; (3) risk factors related to recipients; and (4) impact of UTI on graft function. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of medical records from renal transplant patients from January to December 2010. Local ethics committee approved the protocol. RESULTS: The incidence of UTI in this series was 34.2%. Risk factors for UTI were older age, (independent of gender), biopsy-proven acute rejection episodes, and kidneys from deceased donors (United Network for Organ Sharing criteria). For female patients, the number of pretransplant pregnancies was an additional risk factor. Recurrent UTI was observed in 44% of patients from the UTI group. The most common infectious agents were Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae, for both isolated and recurrent UTI. No difference in renal graft function or immunosuppressive therapy was observed between groups after the 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In this series, older age, previous pregnancy, kidneys from expanded criteria donors, and biopsy-proven acute rejection episodes were risk factors for posttransplant UTI. Recurrence of UTI was observed in 44%, with no negative impact on graft function or survival.

Sirolimus in renal transplantation: analysis of safety and efficacy in a nonprotocol conversion group.

BACKGROUND: Conversion to sirolimus (SRL)-based immunosuppression in renal transplant recipients is an alternative for chronic allograft dysfunction (CAD), cancer and viral infections. We sought to analyze the indications for and safety and efficacy of conversion to SRL among renal transplant patients. METHODS/MATERIALS: We examined a retrospective cohort, using medical records of renal transplant recipients >18 years old who had their immunosuppressive regimen converted to a SRL-based treatment. Data analysis included the indication for conversion, time posttransplant, as well as urine protein and serum creatinine at conversion and 6 months thereafter. The end points included death, graft loss and/or discontinuation of SRL. RESULTS: We included 112 patients in this series who had indications for conversion: fungal, polyomavirus, or cytomegalovirus infection (n = 32), CAD (n = 30), cancer (n = 21), immunologic (n = 3), and other reasons (n = 26). Changes in immunosuppression were performed at 41 ± 57 months posttransplant or later in cancer patients. SRL was discontinued in 9 patients owing to adverse events such as edema, proteinuria, mucositis, or pneumonitis. Graft loss was observed in 19 patients, and death in 6. In 87 patients with functioning grafts, protein/creatinine ratios increased from 0.28 ± 0.03 (conversion) to 0.63 ± 0.09 (after 6 months; P < .001). Serum creatinine decreased from 2.24 ± 0.13 (conversion) to 1.89 ± 0.75 mg/dL (after 6 months; P < .001). Graft survival was 88% at 1 and 80% at 3 years after conversion. CONCLUSION: In, SRL was well tolerated; conversion to SRL improved graft function with a slight increase in proteinuria.