RESUMO
The purpose of this investigation was to compare the effectiveness and duration of orthodontic treatment in adults and adolescents with a valid and reliable occlusal index. Another aim was to evaluate variables that may influence the effectiveness and duration of orthodontic treatment in general. Pretreatment and posttreatment study models were scored using the Peer Assessment Rating Index. The difference in scores between pretreatment and posttreatment stages reflects the degree of improvement and therefore the effectiveness of treatment. Variables that reflect patient compliance were recorded from written treatment records from three private orthodontic practices. The sample consisted of 32 adults (mean age, 31.3 years) and 40 adolescents (mean age, 12.9 years), all of whom had four premolars extracted as part of the treatment strategy. The results indicated that there were no statistically significant differences (P > .05) between adults and adolescents regarding treatment effectiveness (occlusal improvement) and treatment duration. Multiple regression techniques revealed that the number of broken appointments and appliance repairs explained 46% of the variability in orthodontic treatment duration and 24% of the variability in treatment effectiveness. Furthermore, orthodontic treatment of the buccal occlusion and overjet explained 46% of the variability in treatment duration.
