Multicenter Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of Clopidogrel Versus Ticagrelor for Neuroendovascular Stents.

BACKGROUND: Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is commonly employed for neuroendovascular stenting due to the significant risk of thromboembolism. Clopidogrel and aspirin are most often selected as initial DAPTs; however, there is limited literature available to support guidance of DAPT in this setting. The objective of this study was to evaluate safety and efficacy in patients whose final regimen included either DAPT with aspirin and clopidogrel (DAPT-C) or DAPT with aspirin and ticagrelor (DAPT-T). METHODS: This was a multicenter, retrospective cohort of patients who underwent neuroendovascular stenting and received DAPT between July 1, 2017, and October 31, 2020. Study participants were allocated into groups based on discharge DAPT regimen. The primary outcome was incidence of stent thrombosis at 3-6 months on DAPT-C versus DAPT-T, as defined by the presence of thrombus on imaging or new onset stroke. Secondary outcomes included major and minor bleeding and death within 3-6 months after the procedure. RESULTS: Five hundred and seventy patients were screened across 12 sites. Of those, 486 were included (DAPT-C n = 360, DAPT-T n = 126). There was no difference in the primary outcome of stent thrombosis between the DAPT-C and DAPT-T groups (8% vs. 8%, p = 0.97) and no difference in any of the secondary safety outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Using DAPT-C or DAPT-T regimens in a broad population of neuroendovascular stenting procedures appears to have similar safety and efficacy profiles. Further prospective evaluation is warranted to streamline the practice of DAPT selection and monitoring to determine the impact on clinical outcomes.

Assessing Cognitive Apprenticeship Impact on Clinical Reasoning in Third-Year Student Pharmacists.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of implementing a cognitive apprenticeship theory (CAT) model into a Doctor of Pharmacy course in improving clinical reasoning skills of third-year student pharmacists over time and preparing them for Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experiences (APPEs). METHODS: This was a single center, nonrandomized, observational before-and-after study from January 2022 through May 2022. Third-year student pharmacists enrolled in the Critical Care Integrated Drugs and Disease pharmacotherapy course at the University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy were administered a well-established and nationally recognized clinical patient case assessment on weeks 1 and 15 of the course. Students were asked to prioritize patient problems and provide recommendations for therapy, goals, and monitoring. Responses were then scored using a predefined case key. In addition, student pharmacists were asked to self-evaluate their confidence in APPE readiness on a 5-point Likert scale. RESULTS: Of the 136 student pharmacists enrolled in the course, 92 (68%) student pharmacists completed both week 1 and week 15 clinical cases and self-assessment surveys, provided informed consent, and were included. Cumulative clinical case scores were significantly increased from week 1 to week 15 (34.8 vs 39.7). In addition, significant improvement was seen in overall problem prioritization, overall recommendations, and self-perceived preparedness for APPE rotations. CONCLUSION: The use of a CAT model into a 15-week pharmacotherapy course improved comprehensive scores of clinical reasoning assessment in third-year student pharmacists and was associated with increased self-perceived confidence and readiness for APPEs.

Multicenter comparison of antiplatelet treatment strategies for urgent/emergent neuroendovascular stenting.

BACKGROUND: Emergent neuroendovascular stenting presents challenges for the utilization of antiplatelet agents. METHODS: This was a multicenter, retrospective cohort of patients who underwent emergent neuroendovascular stenting. The primary endpoints were thrombotic and bleeding events in relation to the timing of antiplatelet administration, route of administration, and choice of intravenous (IV) agent and the study investigated practice variability in antiplatelet utilization. RESULTS: Five-hundred and seventy patients were screened across 12 sites. Of those, 167 were included for data analysis. For patients who presented with ischemic stroke, artery dissection and emergent internal carotid artery (ICA) stenting who received an antiplatelet agent prior to or during the procedure, 57% were given an IV antiplatelet agent; for patients who were given an antiplatelet agent after the procedure, 96% were given an oral agent. For patients who presented for aneurysm repair and received an antiplatelet agent prior to or during the procedure, 74% were given an IV agent; patients who were given an antiplatelet agent after the completion of the procedure were given an oral antiplatelet agent 90% of the time. In patients who presented with ischemic stroke, artery dissection and emergent ICA stenting who received oral antiplatelet agents post-procedure were more likely to have thrombotic events compared to those who received oral antiplatelet agents prior to or during the procedure (29% vs 9%; p = 0.04). There were no differences in the primary outcomes observed when comparing other antiplatelet treatment strategies. CONCLUSION: The optimal timing of antiplatelet administration in relation to stent placement and route of administration of antiplatelet agents is unclear. Timing and route of administration of antiplatelet agents may have an effect on thrombosis in emergent neuroendovascular stenting. Significant practice variation exists in antiplatelet agent utilization in emergent neuroendovascular stenting.

Advancements in the management of acute ischemic stroke: A narrative review.

Primary literature detailing updated management principles of acute ischemic stroke outpaces current guidelines, resulting in heterogenous practices. Recent advancements in neuroimaging have shifted treatment from a time-based approach to an individualized, image-guided appraisal directed by the presence or absence of salvageable brain tissue. In addition, tenecteplase appears to be a safe and effective for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke and is becoming an attractive agent due to its practical administration. Several factors must be accounted for when implementing tenecteplase into the health-system including cost, education, and changes in clinician workflows. Larger studies with broad patient populations are needed to more definitively evaluate whether intravenous thrombolytics should be used in combination with endovascular thrombectomy in patients with anterior large-vessel occlusions. Although debate regarding the safety and efficacy of various endovascular therapies, delays encountered in the identification, triage, and care of acute ischemic stroke patients increase the likelihood of necrotic core lesion development and loss of salvageable penumbra.