Detection of hepatitis C virus by a user-developed reverse transcriptase-PCR and use of amplification products for subsequent genotyping.

BACKGROUND: Detection, quantitation and genotyping of hepatitis C virus (HCV) are important in selecting appropriate therapy. Current commercially available HCV genotyping kits, including sequencing-based TRUGENE HCV 5'NC and hybridization-based INNO-LiPA HCV II assays, rely on amplification products (amplicons) generated by HCV reverse-transcriptase (RT)-PCR methods such as the Roche AMPLICOR HCV test. METHODS: We developed a one-step RT-PCR assay to amplify and detect HCV RNA, and the resulting amplicons were used for HCV genotyping (TRUGENE). A total of 142 clinical samples were used to compare results from the RT-PCR/TRUGENE assay and those generated by the COBAS AMPLICOR and INNO-LiPA tests. RESULTS: Eighty-seven of 108 plasma specimens which were positive by AMPLICOR were also positive by the user-developed RT-PCR, giving a sensitivity of 100.0%. The RT-PCR detected 2 of 21 AMPLICOR-negative specimens and none of 34 HCV-EIA-negative serum specimens, giving a specificity of 96.4%. The 87 amplicons from the RT-PCR yielded HCV genotypes. HCV genotype results from both TRUGENE and INNO-LiPA were all in agreement. The TRUGENE and INNO-LiPA assays identified 69 (79.3%) and 47 (54.0%) specimens, respectively at the subtype level. HCV subtype information agreed by both assays in 34 of 36 (99.4%) specimens. One specimen with HCV genotypes 2 and 4 by INNO-LiPA was classified as a single genotype 2 by TRUGENE. CONCLUSION: Our data showed that the user-developed RT-PCR has comparable sensitivity and specificity for the detection of HCV in clinical specimens. The amplicons generated by the RT-PCR can be used for HCV genotyping by the sequencing-based TRUGENE assay.

Direct comparison of hepatitis C virus genotypes tested by INNO-LiPA HCV II and TRUGENE HCV genotyping methods.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a major cause of chronic liver disease worldwide. It is associated with the development of end-stage liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma. Studies have shown that patients infected with different genotypes of HCV may respond to interferon-ribavirin therapy differently and thus HCV genotype information is very important in helping physicians to better managing their patients. OBJECTIVES: Compare the end results of HCV typing of the two commercially available tests. STUDY DESIGN: TRUGENE Genotyping test (Visible Genetics) was used to analyze clinical specimens obtained from North America. The 5' NC was amplified with the Roche COBAS Amplicor HCV Monitor Test. Amplification products were blinded and genotyped by the TRUGENE HCV 5'NC method. Genotype results were compared with those obtained by the reverse hybridization based INNO-LiPA HCV II (Innogenetics) assay. Additional sequencing of the NS5B region was done to resolve discrepancies. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Among the total of 110 consecutively collected serum specimens submitted for HCV genotyping, 108/110 could be typed by the sequencing method and 107/110 were typable by LiPA HCV II method. Our experiences with the tests suggest that at type level, HCV genotype results are 100% concordant between the two tests studied for those 106 specimens successfully typed by both methods. More sensitive amplification, such as qualitative PCR, is needed to test specimens with viral load lower than 20000 IU/ml. Both tests can be easily adapted by a clinical diagnostic laboratory.