Feline Femoral Fracture Fixation: What are the options?

PRACTICAL RELEVANCE: The femur is the most commonly fractured bone in cats. Femoral fractures usually result from high-velocity trauma such as a road traffic accident or fall from a height and, as such, are associated with a wide variety of concurrent injuries. The initial focus of treatment should always be on assessment and stabilisation of the major body systems. Once any concurrent injuries have been addressed, all femoral fractures need surgical stabilisation, with the notable exception of greenstick fractures in very young cats, which can heal with cage rest alone. A number of different surgical options are available depending on the fracture type, location, equipment, surgeon experience and owner finances. CLINICAL CHALLENGES: Femoral fractures can vary hugely in complexity and the small size of feline bones can limit the choice of implants. Furthermore, cats can present unique challenges in the postoperative period due to their active nature and the limited means to control their exercise level. AUDIENCE: This review is aimed at general and feline-specific practitioners who have some experience of feline orthopaedics, as well as those simply wishing to expand their knowledge. AIMS: The aim of this review is to help clinicians assess, plan and manage feline femoral fractures. It provides an overview of diagnostic imaging and a discussion of a range of suitable surgical options, including the principles of different types of fixation. It also highlights cat-specific issues, approaches and implants pertinent to the management of these cases. EVIDENCE BASE: A number of original articles and textbook chapters covering many aspects of femoral fractures in cats and dogs have been published. Where possible, this review draws on information from key feline research and, where necessary, extrapolates from relevant canine literature. The authors also offer practical guidance based on their own clinical experience.

Management and Long-Term Outcome of Acetabular Fractures in Dogs: A Retrospective Study of 49 Dogs.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to categorize the presentation, management, complications and long-term outcome of canine acetabular fractures, and to determine the factors affecting outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Case records and imaging for dogs with acetabular fractures were reviewed with long-term follow-up via canine brief pain inventory (CBPI) and owner questionnaires. RESULTS: The majority of fractures were in the mid-third (36/52) and caudal-third (13/52) with few in the cranial-third of the acetabulum (3/52). Concurrent injuries were diagnosed in 47/49 dogs; 10/34 dogs had neurological deficits on presentation. Forty-seven fractures received treatment: 25/47 had direct surgical repair (DSR), 10/47 had salvage surgery (SS) and 12/47 had conservative management (CM). Fracture location significantly affected treatment group (p = 0.001). New neurological deficits were documented after DSR in 5/24 dogs and SS in 2/10 dogs. Short-term complications occurred after DSR in 10/18 dogs (five minor, five major) and CM in 1/8 dogs (major). Long-term complications occurred after DSR in 2/15 dogs (major) and CM in 2/7 dogs (catastrophic). Conservative management dogs had worse average owner-reported CBPI scores than DSR or SS dogs. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Acetabular fractures predominate in the mid and caudal acetabulum, with high levels of concurrent injuries. Fracture location significantly influenced the treatment approach taken. Postoperative neurological deficits are common following SS and DSR.