Kinetics of transient hiatus hernia during transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations and swallows in healthy subjects.

BACKGROUND: Proximal displacement of the gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ) is present in hiatus hernia but also occurs transiently during transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs) and swallows. Using a novel magnetic-based technique we have performed detailed examination of the GEJ movement during TLESRs and swallows in healthy subjects. METHODS: In 12 subjects, a magnet was endoscopically clipped to the GEJ and combined assembly of Hall-Effect locator probe and 36 channel high-resolution manometer passed nasally. After a test meal the subjects were studied for 90 min. KEY RESULTS: The median amplitude of proximal movement of GEJ during TLESRs was 4.3 cm (1.6-8.8 cm) and this was substantially greater than during swallowing at 1.2 cm (0.4-2.7 cm), P = 0.002. With both TLESRs and swallows proximal GEJ movement coincided with lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation and return to its original position occurred 4 s after return of LES tone. Kinetic modeling of the movement of the GEJ during TLESRs indicated two return phases with the initial return phase having the greater velocity (0.9 cm s(-1) ) and being strongly correlated with amplitude of proximal movement (r = 0.8, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: The marked proximal GEJ migration during TLESRs represents very severe herniation of the GEJ. The rapid initial return of the GEJ following TLESRs when the crural diaphragm is relaxed and its correlation with amplitude suggest it is due to elastic recoil of the phreno-esophageal ligament. The marked stretching of the phreno-esophageal ligament during TLESRs may contribute to its weakening and development of established hiatus hernia.

High-resolution esophageal manometry: addressing thermal drift of the manoscan system.

BACKGROUND: The high resolution esophageal manometry system manufactured by Sierra Scientific Instruments is widely used. The technology is liable to 'thermal drift', a change in measured pressure due to change in temperature. This study aims to characterize 'thermal drift' and minimize its impact. METHODS: Response of the system to immediate temperature change (20 °C to 37 °C) was tested. Accuracy of pressure measurement over two hours at 37 °C was examined. Six repetitions were performed and median pressure change calculated for each sensor. Sensors were compared using Kruskal-Wallis test. Current correction processes were tested. KEY RESULTS: There was a biphasic response of the system to body temperature: an immediate change in recorded pressure, 'thermal effect' and an ongoing pressure change with time, 'baseline drift'. Median thermal effect for all 36 sensors was 7 mmHg (IQR 3.8 mmHg). Median baseline drift was 11.1 mmHg (IQR 9.9 mmHg). Baseline drift varied between sensors but for a given sensor was linear. Interpolated thermal compensation, recommended for prolonged studies, corrects data assuming a linear drift of pressures. When pressures were corrected in this way, baseline pressure was almost restored to zero (Median 0.3 mmHg, IQR 0.3). The standard thermal compensation process did not address the error associated with baseline drift. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Thermal effect is well compensated in the current operation of the system but baseline drift is not well recognized or addressed. Incorporation of a linear correction into current software would improve accuracy without impact on ease of use.