Drug development for severe asthma: what are the metrics?

Although reversible airway obstruction in part defines asthma, lung function as measured by spirometry alone inadequately predicts the value of new therapeutic agents in the treatment of severe asthma. Our objectives are 1) to review whether pulmonary function and bronchodilator reversibility are endpoints for drug discovery and 2) to identify parameters that predict efficacy in drug development in severe asthma. An English language literature search using MedLine and PubMed was conducted from 1997 to present concerning pathophysiology, diagnosis and therapy of severe asthma using the terms "severe asthma," "irreversible asthma," "difficult asthma," "airway remodeling," "fixed airway obstruction," "reversibility" and "bronchodilator reversibility" as index terms. Eight studies were characterized that encompass 1424 subjects with asthma. Our review identified the limitations of using bronchodilator reversibility as a predictor in drug development for severe asthma. Neither improvement in lung function nor bronchodilator reversibility characterized the benefit of new drugs in the treatment of severe asthma. Newly approved drugs in the treatment of severe asthma show decreased asthma exacerbations and improved quality of life associated with steroid-sparing benefits without altering bronchodilator responsiveness or improving lung function. Although changes in lung function predict asthma control in mild/moderate asthma, lung function alone is inadequate to assess improvement in asthma control in severe asthma manifested by fixed airway obstruction. Endpoints that focus on asthma control, as defined by the Expert Panel Report 3 and GINA guidelines, may predict the value of new therapeutics in the management of severe asthma.

Nebulized dehydroepiandrosterone-3-sulfate improves asthma control in the moderate-to-severe asthma results of a 6-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Inhaled dehydroepiandrosterone-3-sulfate (DHEAS), but not dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), possesses anti-inflammatory activity in in vitro assays and in models of allergen and lipopolysaccharide challenges. We postulated whether an inhaled suspension of DHEAS delivered via nebulizer would improve asthma control in moderate-to-severe asthma patients. We also characterized the safety profile of an inhaled suspension of DHEAS. Patients receiving at least 500 µg of fluticasone equivalent plus long-acting beta-agonists (LABA) entered a 5-week run-in where the dose of inhaled corticosteroids was reduced to 200 µg of fluticasone plus LABA per day. Patients were randomized to 70 mg of DHEAS or placebo if their Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) score was ≥2.0 and their FEV(1) ≥ 50%. When compared with control, a statistically significant improvement in ACQ in 6 weeks of treatment with 70 mg of DHEAS was observed. The median improvement in ACQ was -0.72 and -0.43 for the active and placebo groups, respectively (p = 0.0389); the percentage of patients with at least minimally clinically important difference of -0.50 from baseline was significantly greater in the DHEAS group versus the placebo, (59.4% versus 45.7%; p = 0.0236). Asthma symptom scores, the proportion of symptom-free days and symptom nights, although not statistically significant, had positive trends supporting the improvement in ACQ. Fewer patients were withdrawn from the study for respiratory events on DHEAS compared with placebo. There were few adverse events and no changes in sex hormones despite increases in circulating levels of DHEAS. An inhaled suspension of DHEAS delivered via nebulizer improved asthma control scores in subjects with poorly controlled moderate-to-severe asthma. AUSTRALIAN NEW ZEALAND CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY ANZCTR.ORG.AU IDENTIFIER: 012607000192482.

Sense and antisense: therapeutic potential of oligonucleotides and interference RNA in asthma and allergic disorders.

Advances in our understanding of asthma pathogenesis and delineation of the human genome project are yielding novel candidate targets for therapeutic intervention. In parallel with target identification, the past decade has produced novel approaches to normalizing expression genes that are upregulated in disease processes. Single-stranded antisense oligonucleotides and double-stranded short-interfering RNA molecules, which specifically mark target transcripts for degradation, are being investigated for their ability to modulate disease processes. In both cases, the targets are RNA transcripts, and not protein; therefore, all types of molecular gene products can be inhibited, including historically undrugable species such as transcription factors and phosphatases. Various RNA interference strategies have been successfully tested in vitro and in animal models of disease, and data is beginning to accumulate from human clinical trials.EPI-2010, a 21-mer phosphorothioate against the adenosine A1 receptor promoter region,has completed preclinical pharmacology testing and its initial clinical trials. The rationale for EPI-2010 is that overactivity of the adenosine signaling pathway in asthmatic lungs contributes to airway inflammation and hyperresponsiveness. Phase I/IIa clinical trials have shown EPI-2010 to be safe and well-tolerated, with modest indications of efficacy in patients with mild asthma.