A population-based study of environmental hazards in the homes of older persons.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to estimate the population-based prevalence of environmental hazards in the homes of older persons and to determine whether the prevalence of these hazards differs by housing type or by level of disability in terms of activities of daily living (ADLs). METHODS: An environmental assessment was completed in the homes of 1000 persons 72 years and older. Weighted prevalence rates were calculated for each of the potential hazards and subsequently compared among subgroups of participants characterized by housing type and level of ADL disability. RESULTS: Overall, the prevalence of most environmental hazards was high. Two or more hazards were found in 59% of bathrooms and in 23% to 42% of the other rooms. Nearly all homes had at least 2 potential hazards. Although age-restricted housing was less hazardous than community housing, older persons who were disabled were no less likely to be exposed to environmental hazards than older persons who were nondisabled. CONCLUSIONS: Environmental hazards are common in the homes of community-living older persons.

Mismatches between the home environment and physical capabilities among community-living older persons.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether environmental hazards related to transfers, balance, and gait are any less prevalent in the homes of older persons with specific deficits in physical capabilities than they are in the homes of older persons without the same deficits. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of a population-based cohort. SETTING: The general community in New Haven, Connecticut. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1088 persons, aged 72 years and older, who had an environmental assessment of their homes. MEASUREMENTS: Each participant underwent a physical performance assessment and comprehensive interview to document the presence of underlying deficits in physical capabilities. Items from the environmental assessment that were potentially hazardous for participants with specific deficits in transfers, balance, or gait were identified. RESULTS: With the exception of no grab bars in the tub/shower, environmental hazards were as prevalent in the homes of participants with specific deficits in physical capabilities as they were in the homes of participants without the same deficits, and, in many cases, they were actually more prevalent. Among participants with and without observed difficulty standing from a chair, for example, the prevalence of a low lying chair was 24% versus 14% (chi2 = 13.4; P < .001), respectively. Among participants with and without an observed deficit in turning, the prevalence of an obstructed pathway was 47% versus 37% (chi2 = 8.7; P = .003), respectively; and the prevalence of loose throw rugs was 72% in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: If the epidemiologic link between environmental hazards and adverse functional outcomes can be strengthened, then interventions designed to enhance the everyday function of frail, older persons should focus on the environment as well as the individual.

Screening for dementia in the outpatient setting: the time and change test.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate the Time and Change (T&C) test, a simple, standardized method for detecting dementia in a diverse older outpatient population with varying levels of education. DESIGN: A prospective cohort validation study. SETTING: Two outpatient clinics at an urban teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: The concurrent validation sample consisted of 100 consecutive outpatients 70 years of age or older who were 58% non-white and had a 16% dementia prevalence rate and educational levels ranging from 0 to 17+ years. Reliability was tested in a sample of 42 consecutive outpatients 75 years of age or older with a 36% dementia prevalence rate. MEASUREMENTS: T&C ratings were validated against a reference standard based on the Blessed Dementia Rating Scale and the Mini-Mental State Examination. Reliability, contribution to physician recognition of dementia, and ease of use were assessed. RESULTS: In the outpatient setting, the T&C had a sensitivity of 63%, specificity of 96%, a negative predictive value of 93%, a positive predictive value of 77%, and test-retest and inter-observer reliability agreement rates of 95% and 100%, respectively. When T&C results were added to the physician's documentation of dementia, the number of missed cases decreased from 44% to 19%, and the number of overcalled cases decreased by 100%. When timed cut points were added, the T&C test had a sensitivity of 94 to 100%, specificity of 37 to 46%, negative predictive value of 98 to 100%, positive predictive value of 23 to 25%, and test-retest and inter-observer agreement rates of 82% and 70 to 75%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The T&C test is a simple, accurate, reliable, performance-based tool that can improve physician ability to recognize dementia in diverse outpatient populations.

Importance of functional measures in predicting mortality among older hospitalized patients.

CONTEXT: Measures of physical and cognitive function are strong prognostic predictors of hospital outcomes for older persons, but current risk adjustment and burden of illness assessment indices do not include these measures. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and validate the contribution of functional measures to the ability of 5 standard burden of illness indices (Charlson, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation [APACHE] II, Disease Staging, All Patient Refined Diagnosis Related Groups, and a clinician's subjective rating) in predicting 90-day and 2-year mortality among older hospitalized patients. DESIGN: Two prospective cohort studies. SETTING: General medicine service, university teaching hospital. PATIENTS: For the development cohort, 207 consecutive patients aged 70 years or older, and for the validation cohort, 318 comparable patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Death within 90 days and 2 years from the index admission. RESULTS: In the development cohort, 29 patients (14%) and 81 patients (39%) died within 90 days and 2 years, respectively. A functional axis was developed using 3 independent risk factors: impairment in instrumental activities of daily living, Mini-Mental State Examination score of less than 20, and shortened Geriatric Depression Scale score of 7 or higher, creating low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups with associated mortality rates of 20%, 32%, and 60%, respectively (P<.001); the C statistic for the final model was 0.69. The corresponding mortality rates in the validation cohort, in which 59 (19%) and 138 (43%) died within 90 days and 2 years, respectively, were 24%, 45%, and 60% (P<.001); the C statistic for the final model was 0.66. For each burden of illness index, the functional axis contributed significantly to the predictive ability of the model for both 90 days and 2 years. When the functional axis and each burden of illness measure were analyzed in cross-stratified format, mortality rates increased progressively from low-risk to high-risk functional groups within strata of burden of illness indices (double-gradient phenomenon). The contributions of functional and burden of illness measures were substantive and interrelated. CONCLUSIONS: Functional measures are strong predictors of 90-day and 2-year mortality after hospitalization. Furthermore, these measures contribute substantially to the prognostic ability of 5 burden of illness indices. Optimal risk adjustment for older hospitalized patients should incorporate functional status variables.

Difficulty and dependence: two components of the disability continuum among community-living older persons.

BACKGROUND: Although most epidemiologic studies have defined disability in basic activities of daily living (BADLs) as dependence, some investigators have argued that BADL disability should be defined as degree of difficulty. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the responses to questions about difficulty and dependence provide complementary information that together can depict the continuum of disability more fully than the response to either question alone. SETTING: General community. PARTICIPANTS: 1065 persons 72 years of age and older. MEASUREMENTS: On the basis of self-reported information collected at baseline, participants were categorized into three BADL groups: independent without difficulty, independent with difficulty, and dependent. Additional baseline information was collected on several measures of higher-level function and physical performance. Follow-up information was collected on regular home care visits and BADL function at 1 and 3 years and on hospitalizations, admissions to skilled-nursing facilities, and deaths over a 4-year period. RESULTS: In a cross-sectional analysis, the proportion of participants with poor higher-level function and physical performance increased substantially across the three BADL groups. In a longitudinal analysis, the rates of hospitalization and regular home care visits for the independent without difficulty group, the independent with difficulty group, and the dependent group were 46%, 57%, and 72% (P < 0.001) and 17%, 30%, and 49% (P < 0.001), respectively; survival curves for admission to a skilled-nursing facility and death differed significantly for each pair-wise comparison. Among persons who were BADL independent, those with difficulty were significantly more likely to develop BADL dependence over a 3-year period than those without difficulty (31% compared with 18%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In the assessment of BADL function in older persons, questions about difficulty and dependence provide complementary information that together can depict the continuum of disability more fully than either question alone.

The time and change test: a simple screening test for dementia.

BACKGROUND: Although dementia screening tests are available, they have not gained widespread use in hospital or primary care settings. Our goal was to develop a simple, standardized, performance-based test incorporating real-world activities to augment screening efforts in older populations: the Time and Change (T&C) Test. METHODS: The study followed a prospective cohort design, involving medicine and surgery services at an urban teaching hospital. From consecutive admissions, 776 participants aged 70-98 years, 14% with dementia, were enrolled. T&C ratings were validated against a reference standard based on the modified Blessed Dementia Rating Scale and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Convergent validity with other cognitive measures, test-retest agreement, and interobserver reliability were assessed. RESULTS: The T&C Test had a sensitivity of 86%, specificity of 71%, and negative predictive value of 97%. The T&C Test demonstrated convergent agreement with three cognitive measures, agreeing most strongly with the MMSE (r = .58). Test-retest and interobserver agreement rates were 88% and 78%, respectively. Education explained 3% of the variance of the T&C Test, compared with 13% of the MMSE. The T&C Test took a mean of 22.9 seconds to complete and was acceptable to participants. Refusal of any test component occurred in 39 individuals (5%). CONCLUSIONS: The T&C Test is a simple, accurate, reliable, performance-based tool for detection of dementia. With its quick, easy-to-use, real-world nature, we hope the T&C Test will be used for widespread cognitive screening in older populations.

Predictors of recovery in activities of daily living among disabled older persons living in the community.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the factors that predict recovery in activities of daily living (ADLs) among disabled older persons living in the community. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study with 2-year follow-up. SETTING: General community. PARTICIPANTS: 213 men and women 72 years or older, who reported dependence in one or more ADLs. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: All participants underwent a comprehensive home assessment and were followed for recovery of ADL function, defined as requiring no personal assistance in any of the ADLs within 2 years. Fifty-nine participants (28%) recovered independent ADL function. Compared with those older than 85 years, participants aged 85 years or younger were more than 8 times as likely to recover their ADL function (relative risk [RR] 8.4; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.7, 26). Several factors besides age were associated with ADL recovery in bivariate analysis, including disability in only one ADL, self-efficacy score greater than 75, Folstein Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score of 28 or better, high mobility, score in the best third of timed physical performance, fewer than five medications, and good nutritional status. In multivariable analysis, four factors were independently associated with ADL recovery-age 85 years or younger (adjusted RR 4.1; 95% CI 1.3, 13), MMSE score of 28 or better (RR 1.7; 95% CI 1.2, 2.3), high mobility (RR 1.7; 95% CI 1.0, 2.9), and good nutritional status (RR 1.6; 95% CI 1.0, 2.5). CONCLUSIONS: Once disabled, few persons older than 85 years recover independent ADL function. Intact cognitive function, high mobility, and good nutritional status each improve the likelihood of ADL recovery and may serve as markers of resiliency in this population.