Cumulative H. pylori eradication rates in clinical practice by adopting first and second-line regimens proposed by the Maastricht III consensus and a third-line empirical regimen.

OBJECTIVES: The European Helicobacter Study Group has recently issued the current concepts in the management of Helicobacter pylori infection (Maastricht III Consensus Report, 2005). The aim of the study was to examine the cumulative H. pylori eradication rates that can be achieved in clinical practice by adopting first and second regimens as proposed by the Maastricht III consensus and a third-line empirical levofloxacin-based regimen. METHODS: H. pylori-positive patients were treated initially with a first-line eradication triple regimen consisting of omeprazole, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin and subsequently with a second-line quadruple regimen consisting of omeprazole, bismuth, metronidazole, and tetracycline. Finally, after two previous H. pylori eradication failures, patients received omeprazole, amoxicillin, and levofloxacin, as a third-line empirical strategy. The success rate was calculated by both intention-to-treat (ITT) and per protocol (PP) analyses. RESULTS: In total, 540 consecutive H. pylori-positive patients received first-line treatment (omeprazole, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin). H. pylori were eradicated in 380 patients and 40 patients were withdrawn (ITT, 70.3%; PP, 76%). The remaining 120 H. pylori-positive patients received second-line treatment (omeprazole, bismuth, metronidazole, and tetracycline). H. pylori were eradicated in 83 patients and 7 patients were withdrawn (ITT, 69.1%; PP, 73.45%). Finally, the remaining 30 H. pylori-positive patients received third-line treatment (omeprazole, amoxicillin, and levofloxacin). H. pylori were eradicated in 21 patients and 0 patients were withdrawn (ITT, 70%; PP, 70%). Thus, out of 540 patients initially included in the study, H. pylori were eradicated in 484 patients, 47 were withdrawn, and only 9 remained positive. These results give 89.6% ITT and 98.1% PP cumulative H. pylori eradication rates. CONCLUSIONS: By adopting first- and second-line regimens, as proposed by the Maastricht III consensus and a third-line levofloxacin-based empirical regimen, high cumulative H. pylori eradication rates can be achieved. Thus, a substantial number of cultures to determine sensitivity to antibiotics can be avoided with beneficial consequences concerning cost.

The long-term impact of Helicobacter pylori eradication on gastric histology: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori infection is a crucial factor in the multistep carcinogenic process of gastric cancer. In this process the gastric mucosa evolves through the stages of acute gastritis, chronic gastritis, gastric atrophy (GA), and intestinal metaplasia (IM) before developing gastric adenocarcinoma. AIMS: The main aim of this study was to systematically review the long-term effects of H. pylori eradication on gastric histology (i.e. effects on GA and IM for both antrum and corpus) by meta-analyzing all relevant studies. METHODS: Extensive English-language medical literature searches for human studies were performed through October 2006, using suitable key words. Pooled estimates [odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI)] were obtained using random-effects model. RESULTS: For antrum GA the pooled OR with 95% CI was 0.554 (0.372-0.825), p=0.004. For corpus GA the pooled OR was 0.209 (0.081-0.538), p<0.001. For antrum IM the pooled OR was 0.795 (0.587-1.078), p=0.14. For corpus IM the pooled OR was 0.891 (0.663-1.253), p=0.506. CONCLUSION: The results showed significant improvement of GA, whereas improvement was not shown for IM.

Relationship between Helicobacter pylori infection and esophageal neoplasia: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Helicobacter pylori is an important causative factor in gastric carcinogenesis. However, its role in extragastric gastrointestinal malignancies, such as esophageal cancer, is controversial. The aim of this study was to explore the relationship of H. pylori infection and H. pylori cagA-positive strain with this malignancy by performing meta-analysis of all relevant studies. METHODS: Extensive MEDLINE English language medical literature searches for human studies were performed through February 2007 with suitable keywords. Pooled estimates were obtained by using fixed or random-effects model as appropriate. Heterogeneity between studies was evaluated with the Cochran Q test, whereas the likelihood of publication bias was assessed by constructing funnel plots. Their symmetry was estimated by the Begg and Mazumdar adjusted rank correlation test. RESULTS: In adenocarcinoma patients there were inverse significant relationships with both the H. pylori prevalence (pooled odds ratio [OR], 0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37-0.73; P < .001) and the prevalence of H. pylori cagA-positive strain (pooled OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.31-0.82; P = .006). Similarly in patients with Barrett's esophagus there were inverse significant relationships (pooled OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.43-0.94; P = .025 and pooled OR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.21-0.76; P = .005, respectively). In patients with squamous cell carcinoma there were no significant relationships with both H. pylori prevalence (pooled OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.55-1.33; P = .48) and the prevalence of H. pylori cagA-positive strains (pooled OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.7-2.13; P = .48). CONCLUSIONS: The results showed an inverse statistically significant relationship of H. pylori infection with both esophageal adenocarcinoma and Barrett's esophagus, which might suggest a protective role of the infection in these entities. On the contrary, no statistically significant relationship with squamous cell carcinoma was found.

Duodenogastric reflux after esophagectomy and gastric pull-up: the effect of the route of reconstruction.

Duodenogastric reflux (DGR) is a common sequel of subtotal esophagectomy and gastric pull-up, and it may contribute to mucosal changes of both the gastric conduit and the esophageal remnant. This study investigated the effect of the route of reconstruction on the DGR. 24-hour ambulatory bilirubin monitoring was performed on patients who underwent transhiatal subtotal esophagectomy and a gastric tube interposition either in the posterior mediastinum (PM group, n = 11), or in the retrosternal space (RS group, n = 8): A Control group of 8 healthy volunteers was also studied. The median percentage of reflux time, the median number of reflux episodes, and the median number of reflux episodes longer than 5 minutes, in PM versus RS groups, were 29.1% versus 0.15% (p < 0.001), 185 versus 8 (p = 0.002) and 10 versus 0 (p = 0.001), respectively. The values of the above variables in PM versus control groups were 29.1% versus 3.95% (p = 0.007), 185 versus 21 (p = 0.02), and 10 versus 2 (p = 0.009), respectively, whereas in RS versus control groups they were 0.15% versus 3.95% (p = 0.01), 8 versus 21 (p = 0.04), and 0 versus 2 (p = 0.05), respectively. Posterior mediastinal gastric interposition is associated with high reflux of duodenal contents, whereas retrosternal interposition minimizes the reflux at levels even lower than those of the healthy individuals. The latter type of reconstruction may be a good alternative from that perspective, especially in patients with long life expectancy.