Increased adherence to ACOG diagnostic guidelines for HDP following a workshop in Bolivia, a LMIC.

OBJECTIVES: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) exert a heavy mortality burden in low- to middle-income countries (LMIC). ACOG revised HDP diagnostic guidelines to improve identifying pregnancies at greatest risk but whether they are used in LMIC is unknown. STUDY DESIGN: We held a workshop to review ACOG guidelines in La Paz, Bolivia (BO) and then reviewed prenatal, labor and delivery records for all HDP diagnoses and twice as many controls at its three largest delivery sites during the year before and the nine months after a workshop (n = 1376 cases, 2851 controls during the two periods). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: HDP diagnoses, maternal, and infant characteristics. RESULTS: Bolivian and ACOG criteria identified similar frequencies of gestational hypertension (GH) or eclampsia, but preeclampsia with severe features (sPE) was under- and preeclampsia without severe features (PE) over-reported during both periods. Increases occurred after the workshop in testing for proteinuria and the detection of abnormal laboratory values and severe hypertension in HDP women. Any adverse maternal outcome occurred more frequently after the workshop in women with BO PE or sPE diagnoses who met ACOG sPE criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Utilization of ACOG guidelines increased following the workshop and improved identification of PE or sPE pregnancies with adverse maternal outcomes. Continued use of a CLAP perinatal form recognizing HELLP as the only kind of sPE resulted in under-reporting of sPE. FUNDING: NIH TW010797, HD088590, HL138181.

ACOG and local diagnostic criteria for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) in La Paz-El Alto, Bolivia: A retrospective case-control study.

Background: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) are a leading cause of maternal death in low- to middle-income countries (LMIC). The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) updated diagnostic guidelines to align signs and symptoms with those associated with maternal death. We performed an observational study to ask whether ACOG guidelines were employed and associated with adverse outcomes in La Paz-El Alto, Bolivia, an LMIC. Methods: Medical records for all HDP discharge diagnoses (n = 734) and twice as many controls (n = 1647) were reviewed for one year at the three largest delivery sites. For the 690 cases and 1548 controls meeting inclusion criteria (singleton, 18-45 maternal age, local residence), health history, blood pressures, symptoms, lab tests, HDP diagnoses (i.e., gestational hypertension [GH]; preeclampsia [PE]; haemolysis, low platelets, high liver enzymes [HELLP] syndrome, eclampsia), and adverse outcomes were recorded. Bolivian diagnoses were compared to ACOG guidelines using accuracy analysis and associated with adverse outcomes by logistic regression. Findings: Both systems agreed with respect to eclampsia, but only 27% of all Bolivian HDP diagnoses met ACOG criteria. HDP increased adverse maternal- or perinatal-outcome risks for both systems, but ACOG guidelines enabled more pre-delivery diagnoses, graded maternal-risk assessment, and targeting of HDP terminating in maternal death. Interpretation: Bolivia diagnoses agreed with ACOG guidelines concerning end-stage disease (eclampsia) but not the other HDP due mainly to ACOG's recognition of a broader range of severe features. ACOG guidelines can aid in identifying pregnancies at greatest risk in LMICs, where most maternal and perinatal deaths occur. Funding: NIH TW010797, HD088590, HL138181, UL1 TR002535.