Longevity and risk factors of CAD-CAM manufactured implant-supported all-ceramic crowns - A prospective, multi-center, practice-based cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this prospective, multi-center, practice-based cohort study was to analyze factors associated with the success of implant supported all-ceramic single-unit crowns, made by computer-aided-design/computer-aided-manufacturing (CAD-CAM). METHODS: All-ceramic crowns placed in a private practice-based research network (Ceramic Success Analysis, AG Keramik) were analyzed. Data from 567patients with CAD-CAM implant supported all-ceramic crowns placed between 2008-2023 by 54dentists were evaluated. Firstly, all crowns with at least one follow-up control were included (n = 907). Secondly, all crowns being followed up for ≥ 5years and all failures were included (n = 151). At the latest follow-up visit, crowns were considered as successful (not failed) if they were still in function without the need for additional therapy. Multi-level Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the association between a range of predictors and time of success. RESULTS: Within a mean follow-up period (SD) of 2.5 (2)years (first scenario) and 6.2 (1.2)years (second scenario) [maximum:12years], 27crowns failed (annual failure rate [AFR]:0.74 %). The main failure types were decementation, (n = 11), fracture of the ceramic (n = 4) or Ti-Base (n = 4). In 5-year-scenario, crowns fabricated in the laboratory had 26times lower failure rate than those fabricated chairside (95 %CI:0.0-0.7;p = 0.038). Furthermore, the use of a silane (HR:0.051;95 %CI:0.0-0.5;p = 0.014) and etching of the ceramic (HR:0.053;95 %CI:0.0-0.8;p = 0.035) resulted in a significantly higher risk for failure than their non-use. SIGNIFICANCE: For CAD-CAM manufactured implant supported all-ceramic crowns, high success rates were found in up to 12-year evaluation. Furthermore, after 5years, no patient-or implant-level factors, but operative-level factor (i.e.fabrication method, use of silane/etching) were significantly associated with failure. The study was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS-ID: DRKS00020271).

Recession coverage using the modified coronally advanced tunnel and connective tissue graft with or without enamel matrix derivative: 5-year results of a randomised clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the 5-year results of single and multiple recession type (RT) 1 and 2 (Miller I to III) recessions treated with the modified coronally advanced tunnel (MCAT) and connective tissue graft (CTG) with or without an enamel matrix derivative (EMD). The main outcome variable was the stability of obtained root coverage from 6 months to 5 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 24 patients, both complete and mean root coverage (CRC and MRC) and gain of keratinised tissue (KT) were assessed at 6 months and 5 years after recession coverage by means of MCAT and CTG with or without EMD. Aesthetic outcomes after 5 years were evaluated using the root coverage aesthetic score (RES). RESULTS: At 5 years, 24 patients with a total of 43 recessions were evaluated. Eight patients (57.14%) of the test and 6 (60.0%) of the control group showed complete root coverage. MRC revealed no statistically significant differences between the two groups, with 73.87 ± 26.83% (test) and 75.04 ± 22.06% (control), respectively. KT increased from 1.14 ± 0.57 mm to 3.07 ± 2.27 mm in the test group and from 1.24 ± 0.92 mm to 3.02 ± 1.55 mm in the control group, respectively. CONCLUSION: Treatment of single and multiple RT 1 and 2 recessions by means of MCAT and CTG with or without EMD yielded comparable clinical improvements which could be maintained over a period of 5 years. The additional use of EMD did not influence the clinical outcomes. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The use of MCAT + CTG yielded successful coverage of single and multiple RT 1 and 2 gingival recessions, while the additional application of EMD did not seem to influence the results.

Global prevalence of edentulism and dental caries in middle-aged and elderly persons: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to analyze data collected from studies worldwide on the prevalence of edentulism and dental caries, in community-dwellers aged ≥ 45 years. DATA: Inclusion criteria; participants aged ≥ 45 years, community-dwellers. Exclusion criteria; participants aged < 45 years, in nursing homes, data obtained from dental clinics or pre-2005. The quality assessment tool by The National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute for Observational Cohort and Cross-sectional studies was used. Meta-analysis using the random-effects model (95% confidence interval) was done with data on participants who were edentulous and/or had active dental caries and stratified by regions of the world, age and Gross National Income per capita. Limitations in the data arose from several factors such as design of the studies included differences in socioeconomic status and access to health care among different countries. SOURCES: Embase, MEDLINE via Pubmed and Scopus, manual searches, from January 2016, restricted to English. Experts from different countries were contacted to identify National oral health surveys (NOHS) conducted from 2010 onwards. STUDY SELECTION: Eighty-six papers and seventeen NOHS were selected for data extraction. Majority of the studies (n = 69) were cross-sectional and of fair quality. 1.1%-70%, 4.9% - 98% prevalence of edentulism and dental caries, respectively. 22%, 45% estimated random-effects pooled prevalence of edentulism and dental caries, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this study, the findings indicate that untreated dental caries and tooth loss are prevalent on a global level with wide variations among different countries, age groups and socioeconomic status. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The findings demonstrate the reality of the new cohort of older adults, with higher tooth retention implying more dental caries incidence and the need for different care strategies to ensure better oral health. Large variations and difficulty in making comparisons among different countries highlight the need for more standardized, regular research.