Health Literacy of Patients using Continuous Glucose Monitoring.

BACKGROUND: Low health literacy and numeracy are associated with poor health outcomes and lower self-efficacy. Continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) can improve diabetes management, but their benefits may be limited by health literacy levels. OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to characterize health literacy levels of ambulatory care patients using CGMs to manage their diabetes in one urban health system. Secondary aims were to identify specific knowledge deficits related to CGM education and determine predictors of self-rated comfort with and understanding of CGM use. METHODS: Participants with type 1 or type 2 diabetes using CGMs were identified using electronic medical records. Participants completed a telephone survey, including the Health Literacy/Subjective Numeracy Scale (HLS/SNS) and an investigator-developed survey assessing CGM comfort and understanding. Descriptive statistics were reported for demographic information. The associations between patient characteristics and survey responses were evaluated using the chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, or Wilcoxon rank-sum test. RESULTS: Eighty-two participants completed the surveys. The median HLS/SNS score for study participants was 80 (IQR 71-89). Associations were found between HLS/SNS scores and education level, reported income, and private insurance coverage. Participants with higher HLS/SNS scores reported higher levels of CGM understanding and comfort. Fifty-one percent of participants (n=42) reported no or inadequate training prior to CGM initiation. Better A1C results (<8%) were associated with higher self-rated responses in the investigator-developed survey. CONCLUSION: CGMs should not be withheld from individuals with low health literacy. Incorporating baseline health literacy assessment and offering literacy sensitive training will help optimize the benefits derived from this technology.

Best practices for safe use of SGLT-2 inhibitors developed from an expert panel Delphi consensus process.

PURPOSE: Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors have demonstrated glycemic efficacy and cardiovascular and renal benefits in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, they are also associated with serious adverse events (AEs), but little consensus exists for clinicians regarding AE management. This study aimed to develop a list of best practices for the safe use and monitoring of SGLT-2 inhibitors in people with T2DM. METHODS: A 15-member interprofessional panel was surveyed in a four-round Delphi process. Panelists were asked to comment on and rank statements regarding initial prescribing considerations and actions for minimizing and managing eight specific AEs and a broad category for other AEs. In the final round, panelists selected if the statements should be considered a best practice specific to SGLT-2 inhibitors, a best practice for general safe medication use in T2DM, or if the statement should not be considered as a best practice for safe medication use. RESULTS: Consensus was achieved for 36 best practice statements specific to SGLT-2 inhibitors and 24 statements as general best practices for safe medication use. Fifty-six percent of the best practice statements for SGLT-2 inhibitors related to managing and/or preventing hypotension, urinary tract infections, and genital infections. The general best practices for safe medication use primarily focused on medication histories, past medical history considerations, physical exam components, and patient education. CONCLUSION: A list of best practice statements was developed using the Delphi method, which can be utilized by clinicians to guide the safe use and monitoring of SGLT-2 inhibitors in people with T2DM.

The Current Landscape of Transitions of Care Practice Models: A Scoping Review.

Transitions of care (TOC) are a set of actions to ensure patient coordination and continuity of care as patients transfer between different locations or levels. During transitions associated with chronic or acute illness, vulnerable patients may be placed at risk with fragmented systems compromising their health and safety. In addition, poor care transitions also have an enormous impact on health care spending. The primary objective of this scoping review is to summarize the current landscape of practice models that deliver TOC services in the United States. The secondary objective is to use the information to characterize the current state of best practice models. A search of the PubMed, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Web of Science, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, National Center for Biotechnology Information at the U.S. National Library of Medicine, and Cochrane Library databases (January 1, 2000-April 13, 2015) for articles pertaining to TOC models, limited to U.S. studies published in the English language with human subjects, gleaned 1362 articles. An additional 26 articles were added from the gray literature. Articles meeting inclusion criteria underwent a second review and were categorized into four groups: background information, original TOC research articles not evaluating practice model interventions, original TOC research articles describing practice models, and systematic or Cochrane reviews. The reviewers met weekly to discuss the challenges and resolve disagreements regarding literature reviews with consensus before progressing. A total of 188 articles describing TOC practice models met the inclusion criteria. Despite the strengths of several quality TOC models, none satisfied all the components recommended by leading experts. Multimodal interventions by multidisciplinary teams appear to represent a best practice model for TOC to improve patient outcomes and reduce readmissions, but one size does not fit all. Best model TOC services must include services along the TOC continuum: pretransition and posttransition, as well as at home and in outpatient health care settings. Studies clearly show that single-modal interventions are rarely successful in reducing readmissions and that successful TOC services must be multimodal and multidisciplinary, and continue throughout the care transition. Utilizing best practice TOC models described in this article as a starting point, practitioners interested in developing their own TOC program should test these tools in new practice environments and add to the body of literature by publishing their findings.