Human collecting lymphatic glycocalyx identification by electron microscopy and immunohistochemistry.

Blood flow is translated into biochemical inflammatory or anti-inflammatory signals based onshear stress type, by means of sensitive endothelial receptors. Recognition of the phenomenon is of paramount importance for enhanced insights into the pathophysiological processes of vascular remodeling. The endothelial glycocalyx is a pericellular matrix, identified in both arteries and veins, acting collectively as a sensor responsive to blood flow changes. Venous and lymphatic physiology is interconnected; however, to our knowledge, a lymphatic glycocalyx structure has never been identified in humans. The objective of this investigation is to identify glycocalyx structures from ex vivo lymphatic human samples. Lower limb vein and lymphatic vessels were harvested. The samples were analyzed by transmission electron microscopy. The specimens were also examined by immunohistochemistry. Transmission electron microscopy identified a glycocalyx structure in human venous and lymphatic samples. Immunohistochemistry for podoplanin, glypican-1, mucin-2, agrin and brevican characterized lymphatic and venous glycocalyx-like structures. To our knowledge, the present work reports the first identification of a glycocalyx-like structure in human lymphatic tissue. The vasculoprotective action of the glycocalyx could become an investigational target in the lymphatic system as well, with clinical implications for the many patients affected by lymphatic disorders.

A comparison of programmable and nonprogrammable compression devices for treatment of lymphoedema using an administrative health outcomes dataset.

BACKGROUND: Patients with lymphoedema experience lifelong swelling and recurrent cellulitis despite use of complete decongestive therapy. Pneumatic compression devices (PCDs), including nonprogrammable and programmable devices that meet individual patient needs, support long-term self-care in the home. OBJECTIVES: Patients with either a nonprogrammable device (NP-PCD) or a dynamic pressure programmable device [P-PCD; Flexitouch® (Tactile Medical, Minneapolis, MN, U.S.A.)] were evaluated to compare associated clinical and health utilization outcomes pre-/postdevice acquisition. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of deidentified administrative claims from 2007 through 2013 of a large U.S. insurer. Outcome variables included rates of lymphoedema-related cellulitis, manual therapy use, outpatient services and inpatient hospitalizations. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to (i) compare outcomes for the 12 months pre- and postdevice acquisition and (ii) compare these two device types for their treatment-associated benefits. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 1013 NP-PCD and 718 P-PCD recipients. Compared with the NP-PCD group, P-PCD patients' baseline cellulitis rate was higher, whereas their postdevice cellulitis rate was lower. In the cancer cohort, the NP-PCD group had a 53% reduction in episodes of cellulitis (from 17·9% to 8·5%), compared with a greater 79% reduction in the P-PCD group (from 23·7% to 5·0%) (P < 0·001). In the noncancer cohort, the P-PCD group also experienced a larger 76% decline (from 31·0% to 7·4%) vs. 54% decline (from 22·9% to 10·6%) in cellulitis rates (P = 0·003). Outpatient service use reduced in both device groups, with greater reductions observed in the P-PCD group. Both device groups experienced reductions in manual therapy use. Inpatient hospitalizations were largely stable with reductions observed only in the noncancer cohort of the P-PCD group. CONCLUSIONS: P-PCD receipt was associated with superior lymphoedema-related health outcomes and reductions in cellulitis.

Diagnosis and treatment of primary lymphedema. Consensus document of the International Union of Phlebology (IUP)-2013.

Primary lymphedema can be managed effectively as a form of chronic lymphedema by a sequenced and targeted treatment and management program based around a combination of Decongestive Lymphatic Therapy (DLT) with compression therapy, when the latter is desired as an adjunct to DLT. Treatment in the maintenance phase should include compression garments, self-management, including self-massage, meticulous personal hygiene and skin care, in addition to lymphtransport-promoting excercises and activities, and, if desired, pneumatic compression therapy applied in the home. When conservative treatment fails, or gives sub-optimal outcomes, the management of primary lymphedema can be improved, where appropriate, with the proper addition of surgical interventions, either reconstructive or ablative. These two surgical therapies can be more effective when fully integrated with manual lymphatic drainage (MLD)-based DLT postoperatively. Compliance with a long-term commitment to MLD/DLT and particularly compression postoperatively is a critical factor in determining the success of any new treatment strategy involving either reconstructive or palliative surgery. The future of management of primary lymphedema has never been brighter with the new prospect of gene-and perhaps stem-cell oriented management.

Quantitative radionuclide lymphoscintigraphy predicts outcome of manual lymphatic therapy in breast cancer-related lymphedema of the upper extremity.

Secondary lymphedema is a localized, acquired lymphatic microcirculatory disturbance that affects large numbers of patients after breast cancer therapy. There is a paucity of objective methods to quantitate lymphatic function and to anticipate the response to therapeutic interventions. We applied radionuclide lymphoscintigraphy to evaluate lymphatic transport and axillary lymph node visualization in women following breast cancer therapy to determine the utility of these data in these patients. Lymphoscintigraphy was performed after subcutaneous injection of 0.25 mCi of Tc-filtered sulfur colloid. Subcutaneous accumulation of radiotracer ('dermal backflow') and the visualization of axillary lymph nodes were graded using our own scoring system. The ratio of radioactivity within the affected to normal axillae (ARR) was also quantified. Nineteen patients with lymphedema after breast cancer therapy were evaluated. The disease severity was documented by serial measurements of the limb volume using the truncated cone formula. Responses to therapy were quantified after completion of the therapy. There was a correlation between the ARR and the percentage reduction in edema volume. The lymphoscintigraphic score correlated with the initial arm volume excess and with the durationof lymphedema. It can be concluded that quantitative and semi-quantitative assessment by radionuclide lymphoscintigraphy represents a potentially useful tool for the clinical assessment of upper extremity lymphedema.