Boosted-Dose Yttrium-90 Radiation Segmentectomy or Lobectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Refractory to Prior Transarterial Embolization or Chemoembolization: A Single Institution Retrospective Case Series.

PURPOSE: To assess the tumor response rates and liver toxicity of boosted-dose transarterial radioembolization (TARE) for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) refractory to previous transarterial embolization (TAE) and/or chemoembolization (TACE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients were identified who had HCC treated between 2017 and 2020 that had been refractory to prior TAE or TACE, then treated with boosted-dose segmental or lobar TARE. Tumor response was assessed by multiphasic CT or MRI using localized mRECIST imaging criteria and serological alpha-fetoprotein levels at three and six months after TARE, if available. Liver toxicity was evaluated using serial serological liver function tests, platelet counts, and clinical Child-Pugh and MELD scores. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients met inclusion criteria. Mean age was 68.7 years (54-89); 8 were females. Three (12.5%) patients had Barcelona Clinical Liver Cancer stage A, 4 (16.7%) stage B, and 17 (70.8%) stage C disease. Three months after TARE, 52% of patients had a complete response and 33% had a partial response. Mean AFP decreased from 33.2 ng/mL at baseline to 17 ng/mL at 3 months (p = 0.782). The median MELD-Na score increased from 11 at baseline to 16 at 6 months post-TARE (p = 0.044); the mean Child-Pugh score rose from 5 at baseline to 6 at 3 months post-TARE (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Boosted-dose TARE resulted in statistically significant favorable tumor responses by imaging criteria in 85% of patients previously refractory to TAE or TACE. TARE resulted in transient but acceptable deterioration of liver function and clinical scores.

Perceptions of Ethics in Interventional Radiology.

PURPOSE: To characterize perceptions of ethics among interventional radiologists to guide the development of an applied, specialty-specific approach to ethics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 17-question survey on perceptions of ethics and use of ethics resources was developed and vetted via cognitive interviewing of 15 diverse, representative members of the target population. The survey was distributed via the Society of Interventional Radiology, receiving 685 responses (48% participation and 90% completion rates). Responses were compared between different demographics, and common themes from free text responses were identified via content analysis. RESULTS: Most respondents indicated ethics is important for IR (93%) and more focus on practical approaches to ethical issues is needed (73%). Various ethical issues were perceived to be important for IR, but differentiating palliative from futile care was ranked as the top ethical issue. Trainees had more ethics training (P=0.05) but less confidence in navigating ethical issues (P<0.01). Regardless of career stage, those with ethics training (44%) were more confident in navigating ethical issues (P<0.01). Use of resources such as information sheets for patients and resources for coping with complications were variable and limited by lack of availability or knowledge of such resources in IR. CONCLUSIONS: Interventional radiologists believe ethics is important and face diverse ethical issues, but they are challenged by variable experiences and access to practical tools to navigate these challenges.