Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 99(2): 433-439, 2022 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33991413

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data focusing on women's outcomes after percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) for coronary bifurcation lesions (CBLs). METHODS: Patients who received PCI for CBLs in the context of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) during the period of 01 October 2015- 31 December 2017, were identified from the United States National Readmission Database. The primary endpoint of this study was in-hospital major adverse events (MAEs). The secondary endpoints were in-hospital mortality, vascular complications, major bleeding, post-procedural bleeding, need for blood transfusion, severe disability surrogates (non-home discharge and need for mechanical ventilation), resources utilization surrogates (length of stay and cost of hospitalization), and 30-day readmission rate. A 1:1 propensity score matching was used to compare the outcomes between women and men. RESULTS: A total of 25,050 (women = 7,480; men = 17,570) patients were included in the current analysis. After propensity score matching, women had higher in-hospital MAEs (7 vs 5.2%, p < .01), major bleeding (1.8 vs 0.8%, p < .01), post-procedural bleeding (6.1 vs 3.4%, p < .01), need for blood transfusion (6.4 vs 4.2%, p < .01), non-home discharges (10.2 vs 7.1%; p < .01), longer length of hospital stay (3 days [IQR 2-6] vs. 3 days [IQR 2-5], p < .01) and higher 30-day readmission rate compared to men (14.2 vs. 11.5%, p < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Among all-comers who received PCI for CBLs in the context of ACS, women suffered higher MAEs and 30-day readmission rates compared to their men' counterparts. The higher MAEs in the women were mainly driven by higher postprocedural bleeding rates and the need for blood transfusion.


Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/diagnóstico por imagem , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/etiologia , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/terapia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Readmissão do Paciente , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Risco , Stents , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
2.
Cardiovasc Revasc Med ; 21(8): 992-997, 2020 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31911165

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Several studies have investigated early readmissions after percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). However, studies investigating 30-day readmission following PCI for chronic total occlusion (CTO) are lacking. METHODS: The National-Readmission-Database (NRD) was queried to identify patients undergoing elective CTO PCI between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2016. We assessed the incidence, predictors, and cost of 30-day readmissions. RESULTS: A total of 30,579 CTO PCIs were identified in the NRD. After excluding patients who had acute myocardial infarction (n = 14,852), the final cohort included 15,907 patients. In this group of patients, 254 patients (1.5%) expired during their index admission and, 1600 patients (10%) had an unplanned readmission within 30 days. Cardiac causes constituted 54.2% of all causes of readmission. During the readmission, 15.8% of patients had coronary angiography, 8.4% underwent PCI, and 0.9% underwent bypass grafting. Independent predictors of 30-day readmission included baseline characteristics [age (OR 0.99, 95%CI 0.98-0.99), female (OR 1.14, 95%CI 1.01-1.28), lung disease (OR 1.36, 95%CI 1.20-1.55), heart failure (OR 1.42, 95%CI 1.24-1.62), anemia (OR 1.30, 95%CI 1.12-1.50), vascular disease (OR 1.18, 95%CI 1.03-1.35), history of stroke (OR 1.50, 95%CI 1.28-1.76) and the presence of a defibrillator (OR 1.68, 95%CI 1.39-2.03)], and procedural complications [acute kidney injury (OR 1.55, 95%CI 1.33-1.80) and gastrointestinal bleeding (OR 1.67, 95%CI 1.03-2.71)]. CONCLUSIONS: One-tenth of patients undergoing CTO PCI are readmitted within 30-days, mostly for cardiac causes. The majority undergo angiography but <10% receive revascularization. Certain patient and procedural characteristics independently predicted 30-day readmission.


Assuntos
Oclusão Coronária/terapia , Readmissão do Paciente , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Doença Crônica , Angiografia Coronária , Ponte de Artéria Coronária , Oclusão Coronária/diagnóstico por imagem , Oclusão Coronária/economia , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Custos Hospitalares , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Readmissão do Paciente/economia , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/economia , Retratamento , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...