RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The Working Group on Ethics in Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine of the Austrian Society for Anesthesiology Resuscitation and Intensive Care Medicine (ÖGARI) already developed documentation tools for the adaption of therapeutic goals 10 years ago. Since then the practical implementation of Comfort Terminal Care in the daily routine in particular has raised numerous questions, which are discussed in this follow-up paper and answered in an evidence-based manner whenever possible. RESULTS: The practical implementation of pain therapy and reduction of anxiety, stress and respiratory distress that are indicated in the context of Comfort Terminal Care are described in more detail. The measures that are not (or no longer) indicated, such as oxygen administration and ventilation as well as the administration of fluids and nutrition, are also commented on. Furthermore, recommendations are given regarding monitoring, (laboratory) findings and drug treatment and the importance of nursing actions in the context of Comfort Terminal Care is mentioned. Finally, the support for the next of kin and the procedure in the time after death are presented. DISCUSSION: A change in treatment goals with a timely switch to Comfort Terminal Care enables good and humane care for seriously ill patients and their relatives at the end of life and the appreciation of their previous life with the possibility of positive experiences until the end.
Assuntos
Assistência Terminal , Humanos , Cuidados Paliativos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Cuidados Críticos , Manejo da DorRESUMO
In patients with advanced dementia and dysphagia, regular fluid- and food intake together with oral medication can be guaranteed by insertion of a PEG tube. Consent to a treatment in a patient without legal capacity requires nomination of a legal substitute by an Austrian court. The following case report describes the problems associated with this particular situation exposing additional psychosocial stress to closest relatives and to the palliative care team in charge for the patient. This case report describes the legal options together with the finally chosen path of medical treatment which in clinical praxis may not always match.
Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer/psicologia , Transtornos de Deglutição/psicologia , Transtornos de Deglutição/terapia , Gastrostomia/legislação & jurisprudência , Gastrostomia/psicologia , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/legislação & jurisprudência , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/psicologia , Tutores Legais/legislação & jurisprudência , Tutores Legais/psicologia , Competência Mental/legislação & jurisprudência , Competência Mental/psicologia , Áustria , Cuidadores/ética , Cuidadores/legislação & jurisprudência , Cuidadores/psicologia , Nutrição Enteral/ética , Nutrição Enteral/psicologia , Comissão de Ética/ética , Comissão de Ética/legislação & jurisprudência , Ética Médica , Gastrostomia/ética , Serviços de Assistência Domiciliar/ética , Serviços de Assistência Domiciliar/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/ética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cuidados Paliativos/ética , Cuidados Paliativos/legislação & jurisprudência , Cuidados Paliativos/psicologiaRESUMO
The present work provides assistance for physicians concerning decision making in clinical borderline situations in the ICU. Based on a structured checklist the two fundamental aspects of any medical decision, the medical indication and the patient's preference are queried in a systematic way. Four possible steps of withholding and/or withdrawing therapy are discussed. Finally, recommendations regarding appropriate documentation of end of life decisions are provided.