Is It Possible to Differentiate Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia and Colonization in the Immunocompromised Patients with Pneumonia?

Respiratory sample staining is a standard tool used to diagnose Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PjP). Although molecular tests are more sensitive, their interpretation can be difficult due to the potential of colonization. We aimed to validate a Pneumocystis jirovecii (Pj) real-time PCR (qPCR) assay in bronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and oropharyngeal washes (OW). We included 158 immunosuppressed patients with pneumonia, 35 lung cancer patients who underwent BAL, and 20 healthy individuals. We used a SYBR green qPCR assay to look for a 103 bp fragment of the Pj mtLSU rRNA gene in BAL and OW. We calculated the qPCR cut-off as well as the analytical and diagnostic characteristics. The qPCR was positive in 67.8% of BAL samples from the immunocompromised patients. The established cut-off for discriminating between disease and colonization was Ct 24.53 for BAL samples. In the immunosuppressed group, qPCR detected all 25 microscopy-positive PjP cases, plus three additional cases. Pj colonization in the immunocompromised group was 66.2%, while in the cancer group, colonization rates were 48%. qPCR was ineffective at diagnosing PjP in the OW samples. This new qPCR allowed for reliable diagnosis of PjP, and differentiation between PjP disease and colonization in BAL of immunocompromised patients with pneumonia.

Inflammatory Cell Differentiation and Chemotaxis and Extracellular Tissue Repair Markers Are Correlated with Pulmonary Dysfunction in HIV Infected Individuals Presenting with Community-Acquired Pneumonia.

Prior studies have shown that HIV patients develop permanent pulmonary dysfunction following an episode of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). However, the mechanism causing pulmonary dysfunction remains an enigma. HIV patients experience chronic inflammation. We hypothesized that CAP exacerbates inflammation in HIV patients resulting in an accelerated decline in lung function. A prospective cohort pilot study enrolled HIV patients hospitalized in Medellin, Colombia, with a diagnosis of CAP. Sixteen patients were eligible for the study; they were split into 2 groups: HIV and HIV+CAP. Plasma, sputum, and pulmonary function test (PFT) measurements were retrieved within 48 h of hospital admission and at 1 month follow-up. The concentrations of 13 molecules and PFT values were compared between the 2 cohorts. The HIV+CAP group had lower lung function compared to the HIV group; forced vital capacity (FVC)% predicted and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)% predicted decreased, while FEV1/FVC remained constant. APRIL, BAFF, CCL3, and TIMP-1 correlated negatively with FVC% predicted and FEV1% predicted; the relationships however were moderate in strength. Furthermore, the concentrations of BAFF, CCL3, and TIMP-1 were statistically significant between the 2 groups (P ≤ 0.05). Our results indicate that HIV patients with CAP have a different inflammatory pattern and lower lung function compared to HIV patients without CAP. BAFF, CCL3, and TIMP-1 were abnormally elevated in HIV patients with CAP. Future studies with larger cohorts are required to verify these results. In addition, further investigation is required to determine if BAFF, CCL3, and TIMP-1 play a role in the process causing pulmonary dysfunction.

Usefulness of FTA® cards as a Pneumocystis-DNA extraction method in bronchoalveolar lavage samples.

BACKGROUND: FTA® cards (Fast Technology for Analysis of Nucleic Acids) are an alternative DNA extraction method in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples for Pneumocystis jirovecii molecular analyses. The goal was to evaluate the usefulness of FTA® cards to detect P. jirovecii-DNA by PCR in BAL samples compared to silica adsorption chromatography (SAC). METHODS: This study used 134 BAL samples from immunocompromised patients previously studied to establish microbiological aetiology of pneumonia, among them 15 cases of Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) documented by staining and 119 with other alternative diagnoses. The FTA® system and SAC were used for DNA extraction and then amplified by nested PCR to detect P. jirovecii. Performance and concordance of the two DNA extraction methods compared to P. jirovecii microscopy were calculated. The influence of the macroscopic characteristics, transportation of samples and the duration of the FTA® card storage (1, 7, 10 or 12 months) were also evaluated. RESULTS: Among 134 BAL samples, 56% were positive for P. jirovecii-DNA by SAC and 27% by FTA®. All 15 diagnosed by microscopy were detected by FTA® and SAC. Specificity of the FTA® system and SAC were 82.4% and 49.6%, respectively. Compared to SAC, positivity by FTA® decreased with the presence of blood in BAL (62% vs 13.5%). The agreement between samples at 7, 10 and 12 months was 92.5% for FTA®. Positive cases by FTA® remained the same after shipment by mail. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that FTA® is a practical, safe and economical method to preserve P. jirovecii-DNA in BAL samples for molecular studies.

[Microscopic diagnosis of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in bronchoalveolar lavage and oropharyngeal wash samples of immunocompromised patients with pneumonia]. / Diagnóstico microscópico de neumonía por Pneumocystis jirovecii en muestras de lavado broncoalveolar y lavado orofaríngeo de pacientes inmunocomprometidos con neumonía.

INTRODUCTION: The diagnosis of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia is based on observation of the microorganism using several staining techniques in respiratory samples, especially bronchoalveolar lavage and induced sputum. Recently, the fungus also has been detected in oropharyngeal wash samples, but only using molecular tests. OBJECTIVE: The diagnostic yield of two microscopic stains, toluidine blue O and direct fluorescent antibody, was compared in bronchoalveolar lavage and oropharyngeal wash samples for the detection of P. jirovecii in immunocompromised patients with pneumonia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cross-sectional evaluation diagnostic tests were used in 166 immunosuppressed patients with suspected P. jirovecii. By protocol, bronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage and oropharyngeal wash samples were prepared by cytocentrifugation, and slides were stained with toluidine blue and fluorescent antibody. The proportion of positive results from each stain and concordance between them were determined. RESULTS: Twenty-four cases (14.5%) of P. jirovecii were detected in bronchoalveolar lavage samples. Of them, 21 were positive by both toluidine blue and fluorescent antibody stains, whereas 3 cases were detected by fluorescent antibody alone. None of the 166 oropharyngeal wash samples were positive by either of these techniques. No significant differences were found between proportions from positive results (p=0.63). Concordance (kappa coefficient) between both stains was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.84-1.00). CONCLUSIONS: Both techniques were useful to diagnose P. jirovecii in bronchoalveolar lavage samples. However, toluidine blue stain did not detect 12% of fluorescent antibody positive cases. Oropharyngeal wash samples do not provide sufficient material for the microscopic identification of this fungus.

Diagnóstico microscópico de neumonía por Pneumocystis jirovecii en muestras de lavado broncoalveolar y lavado orofaríngeo de pacientes inmunocomprometidos con neumoníA / Microscopic diagnosis of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in bronchoalveolar lavage and oropharyngeal wash samples of immunocompromised patients with pneumonia

Introducción. El diagnóstico de neumonía por Pneumocystis jirovecii se fundamenta en la visualización microscópica del hongo en secreciones respiratorias. Técnicas moleculares recientes también lo han detectado en muestras de orofaringe, pero su utilidad diagnóstica es discutible. En Colombia, hay poca información al respecto. Objetivo. Comparar el rendimiento de dos coloraciones, azul de toluidina O e inmunofluorescencia directa, en muestras de lavado broncoalveolar y lavado orofaríngeo en pacientes inmunocomprometidos con neumonía. Materiales y métodos. Se llevó a cabo un estudio transversal de evaluación de pruebas diagnósticas en 166 pacientes inmunocomprometidos con sospecha de neumonía por P. jirovecii. Por protocolo, las muestras de lavado broncoalveolar y orofaríngeo se citocentrifugaron y se colorearon con azul de toluidina e inmunofluorescencia. Se determinó la proporción de resultados positivos con ambas tinciones en cada una de las muestras, y la concordancia entre ellas. Resultados. Se detectaron 24 casos de neumonía por P. jirovecii en las muestras de lavado broncoalveolar (14,5 %), 21 de los cuales fueron positivos por ambas pruebas, mientras que tres casos se detectaron sólo por inmunofluorescencia. Ninguna de las 166 muestras de lavado orofaríngeo fue positiva por cualquiera de estas técnicas. Al comparar las proporciones de resultados positivos, no se encontraron desacuerdos significativos (p=0,63). La concordancia (coeficiente kappa) entre ellas fue de 0,92 (IC95%: 0,84-1). Conclusiones. Ambas coloraciones son útiles para diagnosticar neumonía por P. jirovecii en muestras de lavado broncoalveolar. Sin embargo, el azul de toluidina no detecta, aproximadamente, el 12 % de los casos positivos por inmunofluorescencia. Las muestras de lavado orofaríngeo no son apropiadas para detectar microscópicamente P. jirovecii.

Introduction. The diagnosis of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia is based on observation of the microorganism using several staining techniques in respiratory samples, especially bronchoalveolar lavage and induced sputum. Recently, the fungus also has been detected in oropharyngeal wash samples, but only using molecular tests. Objective. The diagnostic yield of two microscopic stains, toluidine blue O and direct fluorescent antibody, was compared in bronchoalveolar lavage and oropharyngeal wash samples for the detection of P. jirovecii in immunocompromised patients with pneumonia. Materials and methods. Cross-sectional evaluation diagnostic tests were used in 166 immunossupressed patients with suspected P. jirovecii. By protocol, bronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage and oropharyngeal wash samples were prepared by cytocentrifugation, and slides were stained with toluidine blue and fluorescent antibody. The proportion of positive results from each stain and concordance between them were determined. Results. Twenty-four cases (14.5%) of P. jirovecii were detected in bronchoalveolar lavage samples. Of them, 21 were positive by both toluidine blue and fluorescent antibody stains, whereas 3 cases were detected by fluorescent antibody alone. None of the 166 oropharyngeal wash samples were positive by either of these techniques. No significant differences were found between proportions from positive results (p=0.63). Concordance (kappa coefficient) between both stains was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.84-1.00). Conclusions. Both techniques were useful to diagnose P. jirovecii in bronchoalveolar lavage samples. However, toluidine blue stain did not detect 12% of fluorescent antibody positive cases. Oropharyngeal wash samples do not provide sufficient material for the microscopic identification of this fungus.