Ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization in cancer patients improves the success rate of cannulation and reduces mechanical complications: a prospective observational study of 1,978 consecutive catheterizations.

BACKGROUND: A central venous catheter (CVC) currently represents the most frequently adopted intravenous line for patients undergoing infusional chemotherapy and/or high-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation and parenteral nutrition. CVC insertion represents a risk for pneumothorax, nerve or arterial punctures. The aim of this prospective observational study was to explore the safety and efficacy of CVC insertion under ultrasound (US) guidance and to confirm its utility in clinical practice in cancer patients. METHODS: Consecutive adult patients attending the oncology-hematology department were eligible if they had solid or hematologic malignancies and required CVC insertion. Four types of possible complication were defined a priore: mechanical, thrombotic, infection and malfunctioning. The patient was placed in Trendelenburg's position, a 7.5 MHZ puncturing US probe was placed in the supraclavicular site and a 16-gauge needle was advanced under real-time US guidance into the last portion of internal jugular vein. The Seldinger technique was used to place the catheter, which was advanced into the superior vena cava until insertion into right atrium. Within two hours after each procedure, an upright chest X-ray and ultrasound scanning were carried out to confirm the CVC position and to rule out a pneumotorax. CVC-related infections, symptomatic vein thrombosis and malfunctioning were recorded. RESULTS: From December 2000 to January 2009, 1,978 CVC insertional procedures were applied to 1,660 consecutive patients. The procedure was performed 580 times in patients with hematologic malignancies and 1,398 times those with solid tumors. A single-needle puncture of the vein was performed on 1,948 of 1,978 procedures (98.48%); only eighteen attempts among 1,978 failed (0.9%). No pneumotorax, no major bleeding, and no nerve puncture were reported; four cases (0.2%) showed self-limiting hematomas. The mean lifespan of CVC was 189.7 +/- 18.6 days (range 7-701). Symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis of the upper limbs developed in 48 patients (2.42%). Catheter-related infections occurred in 197 (9.96%) of the catheters inserted. They were successfully treated with antibiotics and only in 48 (2.9%) patients definitive CVC removal was required for infection and/or thrombosis or malfunctioning. CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the largest published series of consecutive patients with cancer undergoing CVC insertion under US guidance; this procedure allowed the completion of the therapeutic program for 1,930/1,978 (97.6%) of the catheters inserted. The absence of pneumotorax and other major complications indicates that US guidance should be mandatory for CVC insertion in patients with cancer.

Oxaliplatin in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) in patients with metastatic gastric cancer (MGC).

OBJECTIVE: Treatment options for advanced or metastatic gastric cancer (A/MGC) are limited and inclusion of novel substances is necessary. Few studies have confirmed the activity and tolerability of the combination of oxaliplatin (OXA) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) modulated with leucovorin (LV) administrated to patients with A/MGC. The goal of current study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of Folfox-4 regimen in patients with A/MGC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-six patients were treated with Folfox-4 regimen. Treatment was continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or until a patient chose to discontinue treatment. Responses to treatment and toxicity were recorded according to the WHO criteria and NCI toxicity criteria. RESULTS: All patients were assessable for toxicity and response. Patients (71.4% male, 28.6% female) had a median age of 65 years (range, 28-78). All patients had histologically confirmed metastatic (89.3%) or advanced (10.7%) gastric cancer. Response was evaluated every 6 weeks; 1 complete (1.8%) and 23 (41.1%) partial remission were observed (overall response rate 42.9%). Twenty patients (35.7%) showed stable disease and 12 (21.4%) had a progressive disease. Median overall survival, time to progression and follow up were 10 months, 6 months, and 11.5 months, respectively. WHO grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicities included leucopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia. No patient experienced neutropenic fever. Other grade 3/4 toxicities included nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, stomatitis, and anorexia. Three patients (5.3%) experienced grade 3 peripheral neuropathy. No treatment-related deaths were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: Folfox-4 regimen is active and well tolerated in patients with advanced/metastatic gastric cancer.

HER2 overexpression as a predictive marker in a randomized trial comparing adjuvant cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/5-fluorouracil with epirubicin in patients with stage I/II breast cancer: long-term results.

BACKGROUND: HER2 overexpression/amplification has been reported to be a predictor of prognosis in breast cancer and a potential marker for selecting the optimal adjuvant chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: HER2 expression and its interaction with treatment were retrospectively evaluated in 266 of 348 patients in a trial comparing adjuvant CMF (cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/5-fluorouracil) with weekly epirubicin in stage I/II breast cancer. HER2 expression was determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) using the monoclonal antibody CB11. Initially, any cell showing definite membrane staining was counted, and HER2 overexpression was analyzed as a continuous variable and as a dichotomous variable, with a cutoff of > 50% of positively stained cells. Subsequently, the same slides were reanalyzed with the HercepTest. RESULTS: Of the 266 tumors immunostained for HER2, 34% exhibited nearly homogeneous staining with > 50% positive cells. When the HercepTest was applied, 8% of tumors were IHC 3+ and 8% were IHC 2+. At 8 years, no statistically significant difference in relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) was observed between the treatment arms in patients with low versus high HER2 overexpression, although the number of events is low. The OS was statistically shorter in patients with high HER2 overexpression in the CMF arm, whereas no difference was observed in the epirubicin arm, suggesting that patients whose cancer overexpresses HER2 could benefit more from anthracycline-based therapy. CONCLUSION: HER2 overexpression was associated with a poorer OS but not a poorer RFS. However, a Cox regression model did not confirm the prognostic role of HER2 for OS.