RESUMO
To date, the role of hormonal therapy (HT) after biochemical failure, when to initiate it, the therapeutic scheme and duration remains controversial due to the absence of well designed randomized trials analyzing the overall survival of patients. In clinical practice, the most widely spread treatment in this scenario is hormonal therapy with LH-RH analogues. However, the scientific support for this issue is very weak. We are extrapolating the benefits proven for early vs delayed HT in advanced prostate cancer, to asymptomatic patients presenting just an increase in PSA. These patients usually have a long time disease-history until development of metastasis. It should also be noticed the harmful secondary effects acquired with the time of employment of hormotherapy. Probably patients suffering a Gleason score >8 and PSA doubling time <12 months could obtain a benefit from an early castration treatment, even more if they are young (grade 2c). Except in selected cases of local treatment as radiotherapy, the decision for early or delayed hormonal therapy should be taken carefully with patient consensus. The alternatives for hormonal treatment to preserve sexual function, as intermittent treatment, antiandrogen monotherapy, or antiandrogen plus 5 alpha reductase inhibitors, are very attractive in this scenario. However due to the short time experience with these modalities of treatment should be evaluated with caution.
