Estudio sobre el subtriaje del Sistema de Triaje de Manchester en pacientes que acuden a Urgencias por cefalea / Study about the Manchester Triage System subtriage in patients that visited the Emergency Department due to headache

Introducción: La cefalea es un motivo de consulta urgente frecuente, siendo la prioridad detectar a pacientes con cefalea secundaria, especialmente cefaleas secundarias de alto riesgo (CESAR). Para ello, se emplean sistemas de triaje como el Sistema de Triaje de Manchester (STM). Pretendemos evaluar la frecuencia de subtriaje en pacientes que acudieron a Urgencias por cefalea. Material y métodos: Estudio de serie de casos consecutivos. Se analizaron pacientes que acudieron a Urgencias refiriendo cefalea y tuvieron algún dato de alarma, definido como la presencia de datos que motivasen la solicitud de neuroimagen urgente y/o la valoración por Neurología de guardia. El diagnóstico de referencia fue realizado por neurólogos. Se evaluó el nivel de triaje asignado por el STM y la presencia de datos de alarma que implicaría el triaje en un nivel superior al asignado. Resultados: Hubo 1.120 visitas a Urgencias por cefalea, siendo elegibles 248 pacientes (22,8%). Se diagnosticó cefalea secundaria en 126 casos (50,8% de la muestra, 11,2% del total), siendo 60 CESAR (24,2% y 5,4%). El STM clasificó a dos pacientes como críticos (0,8%), 26 emergencias (10,5%), 147 urgencias (59,3%), 68 como estándar (27,4%) y cinco como no urgente (2%). El porcentaje de pacientes infravalorados durante el triaje fue del 85,1% en el nivel «emergencia» y 23,3% en el de «urgencia». Conclusión: Durante el periodo de estudio, al menos uno de cada diez pacientes que acudió a Urgencias por cefalea tenía una cefalea secundaria y uno de cada veinte una CESAR. El STM subvaloró a la mayoría de los pacientes con datos que implicarían una potencial emergencia.(AU)

Introduction: Headache is a frequent cause of consultation; it is important to detect patients with secondary headache, particularly high-risk secondary headache. Such systems as the Manchester Triage System (MTS) are used for this purpose. This study aims to evaluate the frequency of sub-triage in patients attending the Emergency Department due to headache. Material and methods: We studied a series of consecutive patients who came to the Emergency Department with headache and presenting some warning sign, defined as the presence of signs leading the physician to request an emergency neuroimaging study and/or assessment by the on-call neurologist. The reference diagnosis was established by neurologists. We evaluated the MTS triage level assigned and the presence of warning signs that may imply a higher level than that assigned. Results: We registered a total of 1,120 emergency department visits due to headache, and 248 patients (22.8%) were eligible for study inclusion. Secondary headache was diagnosed in 126 cases (50.8% of the sample; 11.2% of the total), with 60 cases presenting high-risk secondary headache (24.2%; 5.4%). According to the MTS, two patients were classified as immediate (0.8%), 26 as very urgent (10.5%), 147 as urgent (59.3%), 68 as normal (27.4%), and five as not urgent (2%). The percentage of patients under-triaged was 85.1% in the very urgent classification level and 23.3% in the urgent level. Conclusion: During the study period, at least one in 10 patients attending the Emergency Department due to headache had secondary headache; one in 20 had high-risk secondary headache. The MTS under-triaged most patients with warning signs suggesting a potential emergency.(AU)

Study about the Manchester Triage System subtriage in patients that visited the Emergency Department due to headache.

INTRODUCTION: Headache is a frequent cause of consultation; it is important to detect patients with secondary headache, particularly high-risk secondary headache. Such systems as the Manchester Triage System (MTS) are used for this purpose. This study aims to evaluate the frequency of undertriage in patients attending the emergency department due to headache. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We studied a series of consecutive patients who came to the emergency department with headache and presenting some warning sign, defined as the presence of signs leading the physician to request an emergency neuroimaging study and/or assessment by the on-call neurologist. The reference diagnosis was established by neurologists. We evaluated the MTS triage level assigned and the presence of warning signs that may imply a higher level than that assigned. RESULTS: We registered a total of 1120 emergency department visits due to headache, and 248 patients (22.8%) were eligible for study inclusion. Secondary headache was diagnosed in 126 cases (50.8% of the sample; 11.2% of the total), with 60 cases presenting high-risk secondary headache (24.2%; 5.4%). According to the MTS, 2 patients were classified as immediate (0.8%), 26 as very urgent (10.5%), 147 as urgent (59.3%), 68 as normal (27.4%), and 5 as not urgent (2%). The percentage of patients undertriaged was 85.1% in the very urgent classification level and 23.3% in the urgent level. CONCLUSION: During the study period, at least one in 10 patients attending the emergency department due to headache had secondary headache; one in 20 had high-risk secondary headache. The MTS undertriaged most patients with warning signs suggesting a potential emergency.

Prognostic implications of Anemia in patients with acute heart failure in emergency departments. ANEM-AHF Study.

INTRODUCTION: The presence of anaemia leads to a worse prognosis in patients with heart failure (HF). There are few data on the impact of anaemia on mortality in patients with acute heart failure (AHF), and the studies available are mainly retrospective, and include hospitalised patients. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the role of anaemia on 30-day and 1-year mortality in patients with AHF attended in hospital emergency departments (HEDs). METHODS: We performed a multicentre, observational study of prospective cohorts of patients with AHF. The study variables were: Anaemia (haemoglobin < 12g/dL in women and <13g/dL in men), mortality at 30 days and at 1 year, risk factors, comorbidity, functional impairment, basal functional grade for dyspnoea, chronic and acute treatment, clinical and analytical data of the episode, and patient destination. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Bivariate analysis and survival analyses using Cox regression. RESULTS: A total of 13 454 patients were included, 7662 (56.9%) of whom had anaemia. Those with anaemia were older, had more comorbidity, a worse functional status and New York Heart Association class, greater renal function impairment, and more hyponatraemia. The mortality was higher in patients with anaemia at 30 days and 1 year: 7.5% vs 10.7% (P < .001) and 21.2% vs 31.4% (P < .001), respectively. The crude and adjusted hazard ratios of anaemia for 30-day mortality were: 1.46 (confidence interval [CI] 95% 1.30-1.64); P < .001 and 1.20 (CI 95% 1.05-1.38); P = .009, respectively, and 1.57 (CI 95% 1.47-1.68) and 1.30 (CI 95% 1.20-1.40) for mortality at 1 year. The weight of anaemia on mortality was different in each follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Anaemia is an independent predictor of mortality at 30 days and 1 year in patients with AHF attended in HEDs. It is important to study the aetiology of AHF since adequate treatment would reduce mortality.

Study about the Manchester Triage System subtriage in patients that visited the Emergency Department due to headache. / Estudio sobre el subtriaje del Sistema de Triaje de Manchester en pacientes que acuden a Urgencias por cefalea.

INTRODUCTION: Headache is a frequent cause of consultation; it is important to detect patients with secondary headache, particularly high-risk secondary headache. Such systems as the Manchester Triage System (MTS) are used for this purpose. This study aims to evaluate the frequency of sub-triage in patients attending the Emergency Department due to headache. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We studied a series of consecutive patients who came to the Emergency Department with headache and presenting some warning sign, defined as the presence of signs leading the physician to request an emergency neuroimaging study and/or assessment by the on-call neurologist. The reference diagnosis was established by neurologists. We evaluated the MTS triage level assigned and the presence of warning signs that may imply a higher level than that assigned. RESULTS: We registered a total of 1,120 emergency department visits due to headache, and 248 patients (22.8%) were eligible for study inclusion. Secondary headache was diagnosed in 126 cases (50.8% of the sample; 11.2% of the total), with 60 cases presenting high-risk secondary headache (24.2%; 5.4%). According to the MTS, two patients were classified as immediate (0.8%), 26 as very urgent (10.5%), 147 as urgent (59.3%), 68 as normal (27.4%), and five as not urgent (2%). The percentage of patients under-triaged was 85.1% in the very urgent classification level and 23.3% in the urgent level. CONCLUSION: During the study period, at least one in 10 patients attending the Emergency Department due to headache had secondary headache; one in 20 had high-risk secondary headache. The MTS under-triaged most patients with warning signs suggesting a potential emergency.

Intervención en ancianos frágiles desde urgencias / Intervention in frail elderly patients from emergency care

No disponible

Implantación de la ecografía en los servicios de urgencias hospitalarios / Implementation of echography in hospital emergency services

No disponible

Sigamos investigando sobre el lenguaje no verbal en el dolor torácico de origen coronario / Continued research into nonverbal language in chest pain of coronary origin

No disponible

El anciano frágil con insuficiencia cardiaca aguda: un verdadero reto del sistema sanitario / Frail older patients with acute heart failure: a real challenge of health care

No disponible

Educación y concienciación en el paciente diabético con síndrome coronario agudo con elevación del ST / Education and awareness in the diabetic patient with ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome

No disponible

Detección del paciente paliativo con insuficiencia cardiaca aguda en urgencias / Detection of palliative patients with acute cardiac insufficiency in the emergency department

No disponible

[Effect of antidiabetes treatment adjustment at discharge on 30-day outcomes of patients with diabetes mellitus presenting to an emergency department with hypoglycemia]. / Efecto del ajuste del tratamiento al alta en los resultados a 30 días en los pacientes diabéticos atendidos por hipoglucemia en un servicio de urgencias hospitalario.

BACKGROUND: To determine if antidiabetes treatment adjustment at discharge from an Emergency Department(ED) is associated with 30-day outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus presenting to the ED with hypoglycemia. METHODS: Retrospective cohort observational study. Patients with diabetes mellitus presenting to the ED with hypoglycemia directly discharged from the ED between 2012-2014 were included. Primary outcome was a 30-day composite adverse event(mortality or revisiting). RESULTS: A total of 203 patients were included with a mean age of 69.7 (SD 18.9), mainly type 2 diabetics.Hypoglycemia was the primary diagnosis in 162(79%) of patients and antidiabetes treatment was adjusted at discharge in 98 (48%) of cases. Non-adjustment of antidiabetes treatment at ED discharge was an independent factor associated with a 30-day adverse event (OR=2.8; CI 95%=1.34-5.93; p=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Non-adjustment of antidiabetes treatment at discharge in patients with diabetes mellitus presenting to the ED with hypoglycemia could be an independent factor of suffering a 30-day adverse event.

Efecto del ajuste del tratamiento al alta en los resultados a 30 días en los pacientes con diabetes mellitus atendidos por hipoglucemia en un servicio de urgencias hospitalario / Effect of antidiabetes treatment adjustment at discharge on 30-day outcomes of patients with diabetes mellitus presenting to an emergency department with hypoglycemia

Fundamento: Determinar si ajustar el tratamiento antidiabético al alta se relaciona con los resultados a 30 días en los pacientes con diabetes mellitus atendidos por hipoglucemia en un servicio de urgencias (SU). Método: Estudio observacional de cohorte retrospectivo. Se incluyeron todos los pacientes con diabetes mellitus con hipoglucemia dados del alta desde SU entre 2012-2014. La variable resultado fue un evento adverso por cualquier causa a los 30 días. Resultados: El estudio se realizó en 203 pacientes con edad media de 69,7(DE 18,9) mayoritariamente con diabetes mellitus tipo 2. El diagnóstico de hipoglucemia fue principal en 162 (79%) y se realizó ajuste terapéutico en 98 (48%) casos. El no ajuste de tratamiento fue un factor independiente asociado con un evento adverso a los 30 días (OR=2,82; IC 95%=1,34-5,93; p=0,006). Conclusiones: No ajustar el tratamiento antidiabético al alta del SU podría ser un factor independiente de sufrir un resultado adverso a los 30 días en los pacientes con diabetes mellitus que presentaron hipoglucemia en un SU (AU)

Background: To determine if antidiabetes treatment adjustment at discharge from an Emergency Department (ED) is associated with 30-day outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus presenting to the ED with hypoglycemia. Methods: Retrospective cohort observational study. Patients with diabetes mellitus presenting to the ED with hypoglycemia directly discharged from the ED between 2012-2014 were included. Primary outcome was a 30-day composite adverse event (mortality or revisiting). Results: A total of 203 patients were included with a mean age of 69.7 (SD18.9), mainly type 2 diabetics. Hypoglycemia was the primary diagnosis in 162 (79%) of patients and antidiabetes treatment was adjusted at discharge in 98 (48%) of cases. Non-adjustment of antidiabetes treatment at ED discharge was an independent factor associated with a 30-day adverse event (OR=2.8; CI 95%=1.34-5.93; p=0.006). Conclusions: Non-adjustment of antidiabetes treatment at discharge in patients with diabetes mellitus presenting to the ED with hypoglycemia could be an independent factor of suffering a 30-day adverse event (AU)