Retrospective analysis of surgical resection after induction chemotherapy for patients with T4b squamous cell head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: Standard treatment of patients with T4b squamous cell head and neck cancer (T4b-SCHNC) is concomitant chemo-radiotherapy (CT-RT). Recent Phase III trials with Taxane containing induction chemotherapy (IC) suggest that IC could also play a role in this setting. The value of resecting the residual mass after IC and before RT is not yet clear in this context. METHODS: We present the results of a retrospective analysis. RESULTS: Between 1984 and 2001, 113 patients (patients) with T4b-SCHNC were treated at our institution with IC. Four patients dead during IC and 57 patients achieved a complete or a >90% partial response at primary and proceeded to definitive RT (or concomitant CT/RT). Surgical resection was reconsidered after IC and before RT in the other 52 patients. Surgery was performed in 13 of them: in 7 patients resection was R1, all of them had loco-regional progression (2 also developed systemic metastases) and median OS after surgery was 21 months, with no patient alive at 48 months. In the other 6 patients a R0 resection was performed: 3 of these patients had loco-regional relapses (1 also developed systemic metastases) and the other 3 patients remain alive and disease free 56, 62 and 72 months after surgery. Considering the 52 patients that achieved less than a 90% partial response at primary with IC, overall survival was equivalent when no Resection or an R1 resection was performed after IC (5 year OS 8 vs. 0%, lrk, p=0.74), but a statistically significant improvement in OS was observed when an R0 resection was obtained (5 years OS 50%, lrk, p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: R0 resections after IC and before RT could indicate an improvement in OS in patients with T4b-SCHNC that obtain less than a 90% PR at primary after IC. We consider that this approach deserves further research in prospective clinical trials.

Randomized phase II study of cisplatin and 5-FU continuous infusion (PF) versus cisplatin, UFT and vinorelbine (UFTVP) as induction chemotherapy in locally advanced squamous cell head and neck cancer (LA-SCHNC).

OBJECTIVES: We conducted a multicentric randomized phase II trial comparing 5-FU continuous infusion (PF) and cisplatin, UFT and vinorelbine (UFTVP) as induction chemotherapy (IC) in locally advanced squamous cell head and neck cancer (LA-SCHNC). Primary objective was complete response (CR) to IC and overall survival (OS) was a secondary objective. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PF: cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) i.v. Day 1 (D1) and 5-FU 1,000 mg/m(2) per day i.v. continous infusion D1-D5, every 21 days. UFTVP: cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) i.v. D1; UFT 200 mg/m(2) per day p.o. D1-D21 and vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) i.v. D1 and D8, every 21 days. Four IC courses were planned in both arms. RESULTS: A total of 206 patients (pts) were included (PF/UFTVP: 99/107): oral cavity: 8%/10%, oropharynx: 20%/25%, hypopharynx: 17%/14%, larynx: 54%/50%. Stage (TNM, 2002): III: 41%/35%, IVA: 23%/27%, IVB: 35%/38%. Complete response to IC: PF:36%/UFTVP:31% (P: no significative (NS)). G 3-4 toxicity (PF/UFTVP): neutropenia: 52%/72%; febrile neutropenia: 3%/20% (P < 0.001); anaemia:1%/14% (P < 0.001); trombocytopenia: 5%/0% (P = 0.02); mucositis: 15%/7% (P < 0.001). Deaths during IC: 2(2%)/3(3%). IC with UFTVP was associated with a favourable OS in the Cox analysis (actuarial 5 year OS: 49% vs. 34%; HR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.47-0.95, P: 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Although clinical response is equal in both arms, overall survival (Cox) is better in the UFTVP arm. Febrile neutropenia and anaemia were more frequent with UFTVP while mucositis and trombocytopenia were more severe with PF.