Seletividade do herbicida saflufenacil aplicado em pós-emergência em dez variedades de cana-de-açúcar na condição de soca

This study was aimed to evaluate the selectivity of the herbicide saflufenacil applied alone and mixed, in post-emergence on 10 sugarcane cultivars in the second year after planting. The experiment was carried out in Botucatu, state of São Paulo, Brazil. The experimental design was a randomized split plot with 4 replications, with the cultivars set up in the plot and the herbicides in the subplot. The treatments were: saflufenacil + Assist (0.07 kg ha-1 + 0.5 v/v); saflufenacil + Break Thru (0.140 kg ha-1 + 0.05% v/v); saflufenacil (0.280 kg ha-1) and ametryne + clomazone (2.0 + 3.0 L ha-1) applied at 49 days after first harvest, and a control without application. The plants had from 2 to 4 leaves at the application time. The cultivars were: SP83-2847, SP80-3280, RB855453, SP80-1842, SP89-1115, RB867515, PO-8862, RB855156, SP80-1816 and SP81-3250. The herbicide was applied using Teejet XR11002VS spray equipment with six spray nozzles, at 200 kPa and, 200 L ha-1 spray volume. Visual evaluations were made at 3, 7, 15, 21, 30, 45 and 60 days after application. The initial visual injuries observed in the sugarcane plants were dependent on cultivars, the herbicides and, doses tested. All chemical treatments tested were selective to the different cultivars studied, without affecting the crop and sugar production.

Este trabalho teve como objetivo avaliar a seletividade do herbicida saflufenacil de forma isolada e em mistura, aplicado em pós-emergência inicial sobre dez variedades de cana-de-açúcar em condição de cana-soca. O experimento foi instalado no Município de Botucatu, SP. O deli-neamento experimental utilizado foi o de blocos casualizados com os tratamentos dispostos em parcelas subdivididas tendo como tratamento principal as variedades de cana-de-açúcar e como tratamento secundário o herbicida saflufenacil + Assist (0,07 kg ha-1 + 0,5% v/v); saflufenacil + Break Thru (0,140 kg ha-1 + 0,05% v/v); saflufenacil (0,280 kg ha-1) e ametryne + clomazone (3,0 + 2,0 L i. a. ha-1), aplicados aos 49 dias após o corte, além de uma testemunha sem aplicação. As plantas de cana-de-açúcar encontravam-se, por ocasião da aplicação, com 2 a 4 folhas. As dez variedades utilizadas foram: SP83-2847, SP80-3280, RB855453, SP80-1842, SP89-1115, RB867515, PO8862, RB855156, SP80-1816 e SP81-3250. Para a aplicação dos herbicidas utilizou-se um pulverizador costal pressurizado a CO2 equipado com barra de aplicação com seis pontas Teejet XR11002VS, à 200 kPa no volume de aplicação de 200 L ha-1. As avaliações visuais de controle foram realizadas aos 3, 7, 15, 21, 30, 45 e 60 dias após a aplicação. As injúrias visuais inicialmente observadas nas plantas de cana-de-açúcar foram dependentes da variedade e dos herbicidas e doses testados. Todos os tratamentos químicos foram seletivos às diferentes variedades estudadas, não afetando o rendimento de colmos e açúcar.

Seletividade do herbicida saflufenacil aplicado em pós-emergência em dez variedades de cana-de-açúcar na condição de soca

This study was aimed to evaluate the selectivity of the herbicide saflufenacil applied alone and mixed, in post-emergence on 10 sugarcane cultivars in the second year after planting. The experiment was carried out in Botucatu, state of São Paulo, Brazil. The experimental design was a randomized split plot with 4 replications, with the cultivars set up in the plot and the herbicides in the subplot. The treatments were: saflufenacil + Assist (0.07 kg ha-1 + 0.5 v/v); saflufenacil + Break Thru (0.140 kg ha-1 + 0.05% v/v); saflufenacil (0.280 kg ha-1) and ametryne + clomazone (2.0 + 3.0 L ha-1) applied at 49 days after first harvest, and a control without application. The plants had from 2 to 4 leaves at the application time. The cultivars were: SP83-2847, SP80-3280, RB855453, SP80-1842, SP89-1115, RB867515, PO-8862, RB855156, SP80-1816 and SP81-3250. The herbicide was applied using Teejet XR11002VS spray equipment with six spray nozzles, at 200 kPa and, 200 L ha-1 spray volume. Visual evaluations were made at 3, 7, 15, 21, 30, 45 and 60 days after application. The initial visual injuries observed in the sugarcane plants were dependent on cultivars, the herbicides and, doses tested. All chemical treatments tested were selective to the different cultivars studied, without affecting the crop and sugar production.

Este trabalho teve como objetivo avaliar a seletividade do herbicida saflufenacil de forma isolada e em mistura, aplicado em pós-emergência inicial sobre dez variedades de cana-de-açúcar em condição de cana-soca. O experimento foi instalado no Município de Botucatu, SP. O deli-neamento experimental utilizado foi o de blocos casualizados com os tratamentos dispostos em parcelas subdivididas tendo como tratamento principal as variedades de cana-de-açúcar e como tratamento secundário o herbicida saflufenacil + Assist (0,07 kg ha-1 + 0,5% v/v); saflufenacil + Break Thru (0,140 kg ha-1 + 0,05% v/v); saflufenacil (0,280 kg ha-1) e ametryne + clomazone (3,0 + 2,0 L i. a. ha-1), aplicados aos 49 dias após o corte, além de uma testemunha sem aplicação. As plantas de cana-de-açúcar encontravam-se, por ocasião da aplicação, com 2 a 4 folhas. As dez variedades utilizadas foram: SP83-2847, SP80-3280, RB855453, SP80-1842, SP89-1115, RB867515, PO8862, RB855156, SP80-1816 e SP81-3250. Para a aplicação dos herbicidas utilizou-se um pulverizador costal pressurizado a CO2 equipado com barra de aplicação com seis pontas Teejet XR11002VS, à 200 kPa no volume de aplicação de 200 L ha-1. As avaliações visuais de controle foram realizadas aos 3, 7, 15, 21, 30, 45 e 60 dias após a aplicação. As injúrias visuais inicialmente observadas nas plantas de cana-de-açúcar foram dependentes da variedade e dos herbicidas e doses testados. Todos os tratamentos químicos foram seletivos às diferentes variedades estudadas, não afetando o rendimento de colmos e açúcar.

Efeito de diferentes herbicidas, doses e volume de calda na dessecação de milheto [Pennisetum Glaucum (L. Leek)] / Effect of different herbicides, doses and spray volume in the chemical management of pearl millet [Pennisetum Glaucum (L. Leek)]

Objetivou-se nesse trabalho avaliar a eficácia de diferentes herbicidas aplicados em pósemergência na de secação do milheto com diferentes doses e volumes de calda de aplicação. Para a dessecação do milheto foram utilizadas doses de 0, 25, 50 e 100% dos herbicidas glyphosate (1.440 g ha-1), em três formulações comerciais (Round up Original, Round up Transorb e Round up WG), paraquat + diuron (500 + 250 g ha-1) e amônio-glufosinato (800 g ha-1). Em todos os tratamentos foram utilizados dois volumes de aplicação (200 e 400 L ha-1). Manteve-se uma testemunha sem aplicação de herbicidas. Os efeitos dos tratamentos foram avaliados visualmente aos 3, 7, 14, 21 e 28 dias após aplicação. Ao final das avaliações foi determinada a massa seca das plantas. O estudo de campo foi instalado no delineamento em blocos casualizados. No final do estudo, aos 28 DAA, todos os tratamentos apresentaram controle total das plantas de milheto, independente da dose e do volume de aplicação, exceto para os tratamentos com paraquat + diuron e amônio-glufosinate na menor dose (25% da dose), nos dois volumes de aplicação, que apresentaram ainda controles considerados bons a muito bom, sendo que para esses dois herbicidas houve efeito do volume de calda, na qual o controle foi superior com o uso de volume menor.

The objective of this work was to evaluate the efficacy of different herbicides applied in post-emergence in the desiccation of pearl millet with different doses and spray volumes. For the desiccation, doses at 0, 25, 50 and 100% of the herbicide glyphosate (1,440 g ha-1) were used in 3 formulations (Original Round up, Round up Transorb and Round up WG), paraquat + diuron (500 + 250 g ha-1) and glufosinateammonium (800 g ha-1). In all treatments, 2 spray volumes (200 and 400 l ha-1) were used, and there was 1 treatment (control) without the application of herbicides. The treatment effects were evaluated visually at 3, 7, 14, 21 and 28 days after application (DAA). At the end of the evaluations, the dry mass of the plants was determined. The field trial was carried out in randomized block design. At the end of the study, at 28 DAA, all treatments presented total control of plant pearl millet, regardless of the dose and spray volume, except the treatments with paraquat + diuron and glufosinate-ammonium at the lower dose (25%), in 2 spray volumes, which nevertheless showed good and very good control, these two herbicides presenting an effect of volume, in which the control was higher with the use of smaller volume.

EFEITO DE DIFERENTES HERBICIDAS, DOSES E VOLUME DE CALDA NA DESSECAÇÃO DE MILHETO [PENNISETUM GLAUCUM (L. LEEK)]

ABSTRACT The objective of this work was to evaluate the efficacy of different herbicides applied in post-emergence in the desiccation of pearl millet with different doses and spray volumes. For the desiccation, doses at 0, 25, 50 and 100% of the herbicide glyphosate (1,440 g ha-1) were used in 3 formulations (Original Round up, Round up Transorb and Round up WG), paraquat + diuron (500 + 250 g ha-1) and glufosinate-ammonium (800 g ha-1). In all treatments, 2 spray volumes (200 and 400 l ha-1) were used, and there was 1 treatment (control) without the application of herbicides. The treatment effects were evaluated visually at 3, 7, 14, 21 and 28 days after application (DAA). At the end of the evaluations, the dry mass of the plants was determined. The field trial was carried out in randomized block design. At the end of the study, at 28 DAA, all treatments presented total control of plant pearl millet, regardless of the dose and spray volume, except the treatments with paraquat + diuron and glufosinate-ammonium at the lower dose (25%), in 2 spray volumes, which nevertheless showed good and very good control, these two herbicides presenting an effect of volume, in which the control was higher with the use of smaller volume.

RESUMO Objetivou-se nesse trabalho avaliar a eficácia de diferentes herbicidas aplicados em pós-emergência na de secação do milheto com diferentes doses e volumes de calda de aplicação. Para a dessecação do milheto foram utilizadas doses de 0, 25, 50 e 100% dos herbicidas glyphosate (1.440 g ha-1), em três formulações comerciais (Round up Original, Round up Transorb e Round up WG), paraquat + diuron (500 + 250 g ha-1) e amônio-glufosinato (800 g ha-1). Em todos os tratamentos foram utilizados dois volumes de aplicação (200 e 400 L ha-1). Manteve-se uma testemunha sem aplicação de herbicidas. Os efeitos dos tratamentos foram avaliados visualmente aos 3, 7, 14, 21 e 28 dias após aplicação. Ao final das avaliações foi determinada a massa seca das plantas. O estudo de campo foi instalado no delineamento em blocos casualizados. No final do estudo, aos 28 DAA, todos os tratamentos apresentaram controle total das plantas de milheto, independente da dose e do volume de aplicação, exceto para os tratamentos com paraquat + diuron e amônio-glufosinate na menor dose (25% da dose), nos dois volumes de aplicação, que apresentaram ainda controles considerados bons a muito bom, sendo que para esses dois herbicidas houve efeito do volume de calda, na qual o controle foi superior com o uso de volume menor.

Lactobacillus delbrueckii UFV-H2b20 induces type 1 cytokine production by mouse cells in vitro and in vivo

Lactobacillus delbrueckii UFV-H2b20 has been shown to increase clearance of bacteria injected into the blood of germ-free mice. Moreover, it induces the production of type 1 cytokines by human peripheral mononuclear cells. The objective of the present study was to investigate the production of inflammatory cytokines [interleukin-12 (IL-12 p40), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and interferon-γ (IFN-γ)] triggered in vitro by live, heat-killed or lysozyme-treated L. delbrueckii UFV-H2b20 and in vivo by a live preparation. Germ-free, L. delbrueckii-monoassociated and lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-resistant C3H/HeJ mice were used as experimental models. UFV-H2b20 induced the production of IL-12 p40 and TNF-α by peritoneal cells and IFN-γ by spleen cells from germ-free or monoassociated Swiss/NIH mice and LPS-hyporesponsive mice (around 40 ng/mL for IL-12 p40, 200 pg/mL for TNF-α and 10 ng/mL for IFN-γ). Heat treatment of L. delbrueckii did not affect the production of these cytokines. Lysozyme treatment decreased IL-12 p40 production by peritoneal cells from C3H/HeJ mice, but did not affect TNF-α production by these cells or IFN-γ production by spleen cells from the same mouse strain. TNF-α production by peritoneal cells from Swiss/NIH L. delbrueckii-monoassociated mice was inhibited by lysozyme treatment. When testing IL-12 p40 and IFN-γ levels in sera from germ-free or monoassociated Swiss/NIH mice systemically challenged with Escherichia coli we observed that IL-12 p40 was produced at marginally higher levels by monoassociated mice than by germ-free mice (40 vs 60 ng/mL), but IFN-γ was produced earlier and at higher levels by monoassociated mice (monoassociated 4 and 14 ng/mL 4 and 8 h after infection, germfree 0 and 7.5 ng/mL at the same times). These results show that L. delbrueckii UFV-H2b20 stimulates the production of type 1 cytokines in vitro and in vivo, therefore suggesting...

Lactobacillus delbrueckii UFV-H2b20 induces type 1 cytokine production by mouse cells in vitro and in vivo.

Lactobacillus delbrueckii UFV-H2b20 has been shown to increase clearance of bacteria injected into the blood of germ-free mice. Moreover, it induces the production of type 1 cytokines by human peripheral mononuclear cells. The objective of the present study was to investigate the production of inflammatory cytokines [interleukin-12 (IL-12 p40), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), and interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma)] triggered in vitro by live, heat-killed or lysozyme-treated L. delbrueckii UFV-H2b20 and in vivo by a live preparation. Germ-free, L. delbrueckii-monoassociated and lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-resistant C3H/HeJ mice were used as experimental models. UFV-H2b20 induced the production of IL-12 p40 and TNF-alpha by peritoneal cells and IFN-gamma by spleen cells from germ-free or monoassociated Swiss/NIH mice and LPS-hyporesponsive mice (around 40 ng/mL for IL-12 p40, 200 pg/mL for TNF-alpha and 10 ng/mL for IFN-gamma). Heat treatment of L. delbrueckii did not affect the production of these cytokines. Lysozyme treatment decreased IL-12 p40 production by peritoneal cells from C3H/HeJ mice, but did not affect TNF-alpha production by these cells or IFN-gamma production by spleen cells from the same mouse strain. TNF-alpha production by peritoneal cells from Swiss/NIH L. delbrueckii-monoassociated mice was inhibited by lysozyme treatment. When testing IL-12 p40 and IFN-gamma levels in sera from germ-free or monoassociated Swiss/NIH mice systemically challenged with Escherichia coli we observed that IL-12 p40 was produced at marginally higher levels by monoassociated mice than by germ-free mice (40 vs 60 ng/mL), but IFN-gamma was produced earlier and at higher levels by monoassociated mice (monoassociated 4 and 14 ng/mL 4 and 8 h after infection, germfree 0 and 7.5 ng/mL at the same times). These results show that L. delbrueckii UFV-H2b20 stimulates the production of type 1 cytokines in vitro and in vivo, therefore suggesting that L. delbrueckii might have adjuvant properties in infection in which these cytokines play a major role.