Evaluation of bone repair with platelet-rich fibrin following the extraction of impacted third molars - randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to evaluate postoperative effects of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) in wound and bone healing, pain, swelling and periodontal complications outcomes after impacted third molars extraction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective, randomized, split-mouth, double-blind clinical trial was conducted. PRF was placed within sockets following tooth removal and before suturing mucoperiosteal flap while no treatment was performed on control group's sockets. Patients were evaluated considering bone volume which was obtained in the 90-day postoperative period. Other variables included trabecular thickness, trabecular distance and grey values, pain, swelling, and wound healing. A Wilcoxon test and a t-Student test were used at a 5% significance level and a Friedman test was used to multiple comparisons. RESULTS: Forty-four surgeries were performed in the present study. The patients' mean age was 22.41 (± 2.75 years) and 72.73% were women. PRF was associated to increased trabecular thickness and bone volume means (p < 0.001). The experimental group had significantly lower pain scores at 4h, 6h, 8h, 16h, 24h, and 72h (p ˂ 0.05). Mean swelling was lower on the experimental group (p < 0.001). The PRF group showed significant higher wound healing (p ˂ 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Alveolar filling with PRF improves wound and bone healing after extractions while also decreasing pain and swelling in the postoperative period.

Latency phase in mandibular distraction osteogenesis: a systematic review in animal models.

The aim of the present study was to perform a systematic review of the need for the latency period in distraction osteogenesis to obtain adequate bone formation. Searches were performed in the Web of Science, Pubmed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane electronic databases. Nine articles were selected for qualitative analysis. Quality assessment was performed using the 10-item SYRCLE tool. Clinical stability was evaluated in two articles, histology was analysed in seven, histomorphometry was analysed in three, and mechanical testing was used in two. The results favoured the five-day latency group in two studies and the seven-day latency group in one. No differences were found between latency and no-latency groups in six studies. A latency period greater than seven days did not provide any additional benefit. Important risks of bias were found in all articles. Some of the results were influenced by uncontrolled intervening factors, such as consolidation time. The need for a latency period for distraction osteogenesis in animal models is not yet clear. Caution must be exercised when extrapolating the results of animal protocols to applications with humans in the clinical setting.