Impact of adjuvant chemotherapy in completely resected stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer.

AIM: Outcome of patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NCSLC) is generally poor, with five-year survival rate of only 23%, when patients are treated with surgery only. The presentation of positive adjuvant therapy trials in NSCLC has changed clinical practice, doubling the number of patients with completely resected NSCLC referred for adjuvant chemotherapy since 2004. Furthermore, few large studies described a large number of stage III patients in non-Asiatic patients and they showed controversial results about survival in completely resected stage IIIA NSCLC. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy in completely resected stage IIIA NCSLC, administered on a routine basis, outside clinical trials. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of patients with stage IIIA NCSLC treated between 1990 and 2008, and included in a continuous, consecutive database. Inclusion criteria were: age >18 years, complete surgical resection, and pathologically confirmed as stage IIIA. The following clinical data were obtained: age, gender, performance status, histological type, chemotherapy regimens, status at last follow-up and hospital where the treatment occurred. Kaplan-Meier's method was used to determine actuarial survival. Differences in survival were determined by Breslow and log rank analyses. RESULTS: According to these inclusion criteria, 415 patients were considered for the present study. The median follow-up time of all patients was 38.2 months. The adjuvant chemotherapeutic treatment affected survival significantly (P <0.001). Also the type of chemotherapeutic treatment affected survival (P ≤0.001). CONCLUSION: Cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy was beneficial in patients who had a completed resected stage IIIA carcinoma.

GLOB-1: a prospective randomised clinical phase III trial comparing vinorelbine-cisplatin with vinorelbine-ifosfamide-cisplatin in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: The standard doublet, vinorelbine-cisplatin, was compared with a triplet of vinorelbine-ifosfamide-cisplatin, in terms of survival, in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From February 1998 to June 1999, 259 chemonaïve patients entered the study and were randomised to receive either vinorelbine-cisplatin (NP; vinorelbine 30 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8 and 15 with cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) on day 1) or vinorelbine-ifosfamide-cisplatin (NIP; vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8, ifosfamide 3 g/m(2) on day 1 and cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) on day 1), with both regimens being repeated every 3 weeks. All patients had stage IV or relapsed disease and a performance score of 0 or 1. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 34.6% for NP and 35.7% for NIP. Median and 1-year survival rates were 10.0 months and 38.4% for NP, and 8.2 months and 33.7% for NIP, respectively. A median of four cycles was administered in each arm. The major World Health Organization grade 3-4 toxicities for NP and NIP, respectively, were: neutropenia (20.3% compared with 9% of cycles), anaemia (4.1% compared with 5% of cycles), nausea and vomiting (22.2% compared with 19.4% of patients) and alopecia (5.6% compared with 29.8% of patients). Four toxic deaths occurred in the NP arm and eight in the NIP arm. CONCLUSIONS: The different schedules of vinorelbine in the two arms led to a greater survival in the NP arm without impairing the tolerance profile, although this is not statistically significant. This confirms that the two-drug combination NP is a reference treatment for metastatic NSCLC. The role of three-drug combinations remains questionable in this subset of patients.