Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Med Ref Serv Q ; 39(3): 269-279, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34000219

RESUMO

The Kaiser Permanente health sciences librarians created inter-regional policies to standardize and guide the work of all librarians across regions. In response to the larger organization's emphasis on promoting diversity and equity in healthcare and the workplace, the library policies have evolved over time to include aspects of critical librarianship in the information services that the Kaiser Permanente librarians provide to their organization. The article describes how the inter-regional group of hospital librarians provide information services through a critical librarianship lens and provides examples of how other health sciences librarians can incorporate these principles to expand their services.


Assuntos
Bibliotecários , Bibliotecas Hospitalares , Bibliotecas Médicas , Biblioteconomia , Humanos , Serviços de Informação
2.
Rev Hum Factors Ergon ; 8(1): 4-54, 2013 Sep 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24729777

RESUMO

The US Institute of Medicine and healthcare experts have called for new approaches to manage healthcare quality problems. In this chapter, we focus on macroergonomics, a branch of human factors and ergonomics that is based on the systems approach and considers the organizational and sociotechnical context of work activities and processes. Selected macroergonomic approaches to healthcare quality and patient safety are described such as the SEIPS model of work system and patient safety and the model of healthcare professional performance. Focused reviews on job stress and burnout, workload, interruptions, patient-centered care, health IT and medical devices, violations, and care coordination provide examples of macroergonomics contributions to healthcare quality and patient safety. Healthcare systems and processes clearly need to be systematically redesigned; examples of macroergonomic approaches, principles and methods for healthcare system redesign are described. Further research linking macroergonomics and care processes/patient outcomes is needed. Other needs for macroergonomics research are highlighted, including understanding the link between worker outcomes (e.g., safety and well-being) and patient outcomes (e.g., patient safety), and macroergonomics of patient-centered care and care coordination.

3.
Ann Intern Med ; 148(7): 535-43, 2008 Apr 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18316746

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the fourth leading cause of death in the United States. Fewer than half of the estimated 24 million Americans with airflow obstruction have received a COPD diagnosis, and diagnosis often occurs in advanced stages of the disease. PURPOSE: To summarize the evidence on screening for COPD using spirometry for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF). DATA SOURCES: English-language articles identified in PubMed and the Cochrane Library through January 2007, recent systematic reviews, expert suggestions, and reference lists of retrieved articles. STUDY SELECTION: Explicit inclusion and exclusion criteria were used for each of the 8 key questions on benefits and harms of screening. Eligible study types varied by question. DATA EXTRACTION: Studies were reviewed, abstracted, and rated for quality by using predefined USPSTF criteria. DATA SYNTHESIS: Pharmacologic treatments for COPD reduce acute exacerbations in patients with severe disease. However, severe COPD is uncommon in the general U.S. population. Spirometry has not been shown to independently increase smoking cessation rates. Potential harms from screening include false-positive results and adverse effects from subsequent unnecessary therapy. Data on the prevalence of airflow obstruction in the U.S. population were used to calculate projected outcomes from screening groups defined by age and smoking status. LIMITATION: No studies provide direct evidence on health outcomes associated with screening for COPD. CONCLUSION: Screening for COPD using spirometry is likely to identify a predominance of patients with mild to moderate airflow obstruction who would not experience additional health benefits if labeled as having COPD. Hundreds of patients would need to undergo spirometry to defer a single exacerbation.


Assuntos
Programas de Rastreamento , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/diagnóstico , Espirometria , Adulto , Humanos , Imunização , Prevalência , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/epidemiologia , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/prevenção & controle , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/terapia , Medição de Risco , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/estatística & dados numéricos , Espirometria/efeitos adversos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA