Near-miss hypoglycemia-reflections on perioperative glucose management guidelines in diabetics.

BACKGROUND: The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) has an impressive array of professional perioperative guidelines but has not issued a guideline specific to perioperative blood glucose management and does not delve into the topic in their other guidelines. CASE REPORT: We experienced a perioperative case that highlights the potential difficulty of glucose management in this setting. During anesthetic induction for an orthopedic foot surgery, as the medication was infusing, an IDDM 1 (insulin dependent diabetes mellitus type 1) patient expressed feeling that her blood sugar level was low. Her finger stick after induction showed severe hypoglycemia with a blood glucose of 34 mg/dL. The hypoglycemia was treated with intravenous glucose and further closely monitored. CONCLUSIONS: This case led us to revisit the different perioperative guidelines and recommendations for diabetic patients and this manuscript aims to highlight the similarities and discrepancies among the different published recommendations. This case highlights the value of utilizing insulin pump infusions in the perioperative setting when available.

Application of a conversion factor to estimate the adenoma detection rate from the polyp detection rate.

BACKGROUND: The adenoma detection rate (ADR) is a quality benchmark for colonoscopy. Many practices find it difficult to determine the ADR because it requires a combination of endoscopic and histologic findings. It may be possible to apply a conversion factor to estimate the ADR from the polyp detection rate (PDR). OBJECTIVE: To create a conversion factor that can be used to accurately estimate the ADR from the PDR. DESIGN: This was a retrospective study of colonoscopies performed by board-certified gastroenterologists to determine the average adenoma to polyp detection rate quotient (APDRQ) for all endoscopists, individually and as a group. SETTING: Academic group practice. INTERVENTION: The group average APDRQ was used as a conversion factor for the endoscopist's PDR to estimate the ADR. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The strength of the relationship between the estimated ADR and the actual ADR determined by Pearson's correlation coefficient. RESULTS: A total of 3367 colonoscopies performed by 20 staff gastroenterologists were included. The average ADR for all indications, all patient age groups, and both sexes was 0.17 (range 0.09-0.27, standard deviation 0.05). The average APDRQ was 0.64 (range 0.46-1.00, standard deviation 0.13). The correlation between the estimated ADR and the actual ADR was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.65-0.93, P = .000001). LIMITATIONS: Retrospective study in 1 practice setting with all patient types. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a conversion factor can accurately estimate the ADR from the PDR. Further study is needed to determine whether such a conversion factor can be applied to different practice settings and patient groups.