Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 11 de 11
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
3.
Am J Cardiol ; 214: 85-93, 2024 Mar 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38218393

RESUMO

The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the delivery of cardiovascular care, including noninvasive testing protocols and test selection for the evaluation of coronary artery disease (CAD). Trends in test selection in traditional versus advanced noninvasive tests for CAD during the pandemic and in countries of varying income status have not been well studied. The International Atomic Energy Agency conducted a global survey to assess the pandemic-related changes in the practice of cardiovascular diagnostic testing. Site procedural volumes for noninvasive tests to evaluate CAD from March 2019 (prepandemic), April 2020 (onset), and April 2021 (initial recovery) were collected. We considered traditional testing modalities, such as exercise electrocardiography, stress echocardiography, and stress single-photon emission computed tomography, and advanced testing modalities, such as stress cardiac magnetic resonance, coronary computed tomography angiography, and stress positron emission tomography. Survey data were obtained from 669 centers in 107 countries, reporting the performance of 367,933 studies for CAD during the study period. Compared with 2019, traditional tests were performed 14% less frequently (recovery rate 82%) in 2021 versus advanced tests, which were performed 15% more frequently (128% recovery rate). Coronary computed tomography angiography, stress cardiac magnetic resonance, and stress positron emission tomography showed 14%, 25%, and 25% increases in volumes from 2019 to 2021, respectively. The increase in advanced testing was isolated to high- and upper middle-income countries, with 132% recovery in advanced tests by 2021 compared with 55% in lower income nations. The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated economic disparities in CAD testing practice between wealthy and poorer countries. Greater recovery rates and even new growth were observed for advanced imaging modalities; however, this growth was restricted to wealthy countries. Efforts to reduce practice variations in CAD testing because of economic status are warranted.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Doença da Artéria Coronariana , Humanos , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/epidemiologia , Angiografia Coronária/métodos , Pandemias , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Tomografia Computadorizada de Emissão de Fóton Único/métodos , Teste de Esforço
4.
Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging ; 5(5): e220288, 2023 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37908554

RESUMO

Purpose: To characterize the recovery of diagnostic cardiovascular procedure volumes in U.S. and non-U.S. facilities in the year following the initial COVID-19 outbreak. Materials and Methods: The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) coordinated a worldwide study called the IAEA Noninvasive Cardiology Protocols Study of COVID-19 2 (INCAPS COVID 2), collecting data from 669 facilities in 107 countries, including 93 facilities in 34 U.S. states, to determine the impact of the pandemic on diagnostic cardiovascular procedure volumes. Participants reported volumes for each diagnostic imaging modality used at their facility for March 2019 (baseline), April 2020, and April 2021. This secondary analysis of INCAPS COVID 2 evaluated differences in changes in procedure volume between U.S. and non-U.S. facilities and among U.S. regions. Factors associated with return to prepandemic volumes in the United States were also analyzed in a multivariable regression analysis. Results: Reduction in procedure volumes in April 2020 compared with baseline was similar for U.S. and non-U.S. facilities (-66% vs -71%, P = .27). U.S. facilities reported greater return to baseline in April 2021 than did all non-U.S. facilities (4% vs -6%, P = .008), but there was no evidence of a difference when comparing U.S. facilities with non-U.S. high-income country (NUHIC) facilities (4% vs 0%, P = .18). U.S. regional differences in return to baseline were observed between the Midwest (11%), Northeast (9%), South (1%), and West (-7%, P = .03), but no studied factors were significant predictors of 2021 change from prepandemic baseline. Conclusion: The reductions in cardiac testing during the early pandemic have recovered within a year to prepandemic baselines in the United States and NUHICs, while procedure volumes remain depressed in lower-income countries.Keywords: SPECT, Cardiac, Epidemiology, Angiography, CT Angiography, CT, Echocardiography, SPECT/CT, MR Imaging, Radionuclide Studies, COVID-19, Cardiovascular Imaging, Diagnostic Cardiovascular Procedure, Cardiovascular Disease, Cardiac Testing Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2023.

5.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol ; 46(2): 195-197, 2023 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36450156

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patients with significant mitralregurgitation (MR) often experience atrial fibrillation (AF). The effects of transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) for MR on AF burden is unknown. METHODS: Patients who underwent TEER atthree institutions who also had a cardiac implantable electronic device with aright atrial lead were retrospectively identified. In patients with baseline AF, device data onAF burden and echocardiographic changes were recorded at baseline and 3- and 12-month follow up time points when available. Data is expressed as number (%) and median (interquartile range), withpaired values analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS: Overall 66 patients wereidentified, of whom 54 (82%) had baseline data on AF available for review. Of these, 18 (33%) had a baseline burden ofAF (median burden 100% [54-100%]). Patients were 77 (71-83) years old, 10 (56%) male, 14 (78%) White, and 3 (17%) Black. A significant reduction in AF burdenwas observed at 3 months (11 patients, p = 0.03) which did not retainsignificance at 12 months (8 patients, p = 0.69). Indexed maximal left atrial volumes did not significantly change inthose with paired studies available (p > 0.35 for both time points). CONCLUSIONS: In this multicenter cohort, one thirdof patients with severe MR undergoing TEER had an AF burden at baseline, whichwas found to be significantly lower at 3 month follow up. Further investigation is needed to confirm thefindings of this small cohort and determine its effects on downstream sequelaeof AF.


Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca , Insuficiência da Valva Mitral , Humanos , Masculino , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Fibrilação Atrial/cirurgia , Valva Mitral/cirurgia , Insuficiência da Valva Mitral/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Estudos Retrospectivos
8.
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging ; 15(8): 1488-1501, 2022 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35331658

RESUMO

Heart disease is the leading cause of death among men and women. Women have a unique phenotype of ischemic heart disease with less calcified lesions, more nonobstructive plaques, and a higher prevalence of microvascular disease compared with men, which may explain in part why current risk models to detect obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) may not work as well in women. This paper summarizes the sex differences in the functional and anatomical assessment of CAD in women presenting with stable chest pain and provides an approach for using multimodality imaging for the evaluation of suspected ischemic heart disease in women in accordance to the recently published American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guidelines for the evaluation and diagnosis of chest pain. A paradigm shift in the approach to imaging ischemic heart disease women is needed including updated risk models, a more profound understanding of CAD in women where nonobstructive disease is more prevalent, and algorithms focused on the evaluation of ischemia with nonobstructive CAD and myocardial infarction with nonobstructive CAD.


Assuntos
Doença da Artéria Coronariana , Isquemia Miocárdica , Dor no Peito , Angiografia Coronária/métodos , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico por imagem , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Isquemia Miocárdica/diagnóstico por imagem , Isquemia Miocárdica/epidemiologia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prognóstico , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sexuais
9.
Cardiol Ther ; 11(1): 23-31, 2022 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34993903

RESUMO

Coronary microvascular disease or dysfunction (CMVD) has been associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Despite a growing prevalence, guidelines on definitive treatment are lacking. Proposed mechanisms of endothelial dysfunction and resultant inflammation have been demonstrated as the underlying cause. Imaging modalities such as echocardiography, cardiac MRI, PET, and in some instances CT, have been shown to be useful in diagnosing CMVD mainly through assessment of coronary blood flow. Invasive measurements through thermodilution and pressure sensor-guided Doppler microcatheters have also been utilized. Treatment options are directed at targeting inflammatory pathways and angina. In our review, we highlight the current literature on the background of CMVD, diagnostic modalities, and management of this disease.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...