Erosive effect of a new sports drink on dental enamel during exercise.

PURPOSE: To compare the potential erosive effect of a prototype carbohydrate-electrolyte drink (PCE) with a neutral control (water) and a commercially available carbohydrate-electrolyte drink (CCE) during exercise. METHODS: : Nineteen healthy adults (male, N = 16; female, N = 3) took part in this single blind, three-way crossover study. Subjects were given each of the three drinks according to a randomization schedule, approximately balanced for first-order carryover effects. At the beginning of each of the three study periods, the volunteers were fitted with an intraoral appliance containing two human enamel blocks. During each study period, volunteers exercised for 75 min.d(-1) (5 repetitions of 15 min of exercise, with 5-min rests between exercise repetitions), 5 d.wk(-1) for 3 wk. Each day, drink aliquots of 200 mL were consumed during a 5-min period before exercise and after every 15-min bout of exercise, followed by a final 400-mL aliquot ingested over a 10-min period: a total of 1400 mL per study day. Dental erosion was measured as tissue loss from the enamel blocks by profilometry at the end of each study period. RESULTS: Water, PCE, and CCE produced 0.138 microm (SD 0.090 microm), 0.138 microm (SD 0.038 microm), and 4.238 microm (SD 3.872 microm) of enamel loss, respectively. A Wilcoxon t statistic showed a significant statistical difference between the PCE and CCE drinks (P < 0.001), whereas no significant difference could be detected between the PCE drink and water (P = 0.740). CONCLUSION: The PCE solution showed minimal erosion compared with the commercially available drink, and was statistically indistinguishable from water under the conditions of this study. Use of CE solutions formulated to minimize erosion during exercise may provide significant dental benefits.

A comparison of enamel erosion by a new sports drink compared to two proprietary products: a controlled, crossover study in situ.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to measure the erosive potential of a prototype sports drink on enamel in a model in situ. METHODS: The study was a single centre, single blind, randomised crossover design balanced for residual effects involving 18 subjects. The drinks were the prototype formulation containing calcium and maltodextrin (test), two sports drink products containing sugars (drink with calcium and positive control) and water (negative control). During each 15-day study period, subjects wore a palatal removable appliance carrying two flat human enamel specimens. Drinks were imbibed as 250 ml volumes over 10 min 4 times per day. Loss of enamel was measured on days 5, 10 and 15 using a contacting profilometer. RESULTS: Very little erosion occurred with the test, drink with calcium and negative control drinks and differences between the test and negative control only reached significance at day 15. The positive control produced progressive erosion over time and significantly more than the test or negative control at all time points. CONCLUSION: The technology of adding calcium with appropriate pH adjustment, which has been applied previously to soft and carbonated drinks to markedly reduce erosive potential, can be applied to sports drinks to the same end. Significant variation in the carbohydrate composition does not influence this outcome.

Antioxidant activity of quercetin and myricetin in liposomes.

The antioxidant activity during storage at 30 degrees C of quercetin, myricetin and alpha-tocopherol in small unilamellar liposomes has been investigated. Myricetin was more effective than alpha-tocopherol as an antioxidant in liposomes under all conditions studied. At pH 5.4 with a concentration of 10(-2) mol/mol phospholipid, myricetin has been shown to be the strongest antioxidant followed by quercetin and alpha-tocopherol. Cupric chloride and ferric chloride strongly reduced the antioxidant activity of myricetin and quercetin with cupric chloride causing a stronger reduction in activity than ferric chloride. At a pH of 7.4, quercetin was less effective than alpha-tocopherol at a concentration of 10(-2) mol/mol phospholipid, but it's activity increased more strongly with concentration and it was very effective at a concentration of 5 x 10(-2) mol/mol phospholipid.