Mitomycin C with continuous fluorouracil or with cisplatin in combination with radiotherapy for locally advanced anal cancer (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer phase II study 22011-40014).

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility and activity of radio-chemotherapy with mitomycin C (MMC) and cisplatin (CDDP) in locally advanced squamous cell anal carcinoma with reference to radiotherapy (RT) combined with MMC and fluorouracil (5-FU). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with measurable disease >4 cmN0 or N+ received RT (36Gy+2 week gap+23.4Gy) with either MMC/CDDP or MMC/5-FU (MMC 10mg/m(2) d1 of each sequence; 5-FU 200mg/m(2)/day c.i.v. daily; CDDP 25mg/m(2) weekly). Forty patients/arm were needed to exclude a RECIST objective response rate (ORR), 8 weeks after treatment, of <75% (Fleming 1, alpha=10%, beta=10%). RESULTS: The ORR was 79.5% (31/39) (lower bound confidence interval [CI]: 68.8%) with MMC/5-FU versus 91.9% (34/ 37) (lower bound CI: 82.8%) with MMC/CDDP. In the MMC/5-FU group, two patients (5.1%) discontinued treatment due to toxicity versus 11 (29.7%) in the MMC/CDDP group. Nine grade 3 haematological events occurred with MMC/CDDP versus none with 5-FU/MMC. The rate of other toxicities did not differ. There was no toxic death. Thirty-one patients in the MMC/5-FU arm (79.5%) and 18 in the MMC/CDDP arm (48.6%) were fully compliant with the protocol treatment (p=0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Radio-chemotherapy with MMC/CDDP seems promising as only MMC/CDDP demonstrated enough activity (RECIST ORR >75%) to be tested further in phase III trials; MMC/5-FU did not. MMC/CDDP also had an overall acceptable toxicity profile.

Shortened irradiation scheme, continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil and fractionation of mitomycin C in locally advanced anal carcinomas. Results of a phase II study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Radiotherapy and Gastrointestinal Cooperative Groups.

The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 22861 randomised trial established that combined radiochemotherapy is the standard treatment for locally advanced anal cancer. This EORTC phase II study (#22953) tests the feasibility of reducing the gap between sequences to 2 weeks, to deliver Mitomycin C (MMC) in each radiotherapy sequence and 5-FU continuously during the treatment. The first sequence consisted of 36 Gy over 4 weeks. 5-FU 200 mg/m(2)/days 1-26, MMC 10 mg/m(2)/day 1 gap 16 days. Then a second sequence of 23.4 Gy over 17 days, 5-FU 200 mg/m(2)/days 1-17 and, MMC 10 mg/m(2)/day 1 was given. 43 patients with a World Health Organization (WHO) status of 0 (n=27) or 1 (n=16) and with T2-T4, N0-3 tumours were included. Compliance with the planned treatment, doses and duration was 93%. The complete response rate was 90.7%. Grade 3 toxicities of 28, 12 and 2% were observed for skin, diarrhoea and haematological toxicities, respectively. The 3-year estimated rates for trials 22861 and 22953 are: 68 and 88% for local control; 72 and 81% for colostomy-free interval, 62 and 84% for severe late toxicity-free interval, and 70 and 81% for survival, respectively. The 22953 scheme is feasible and the results are promising. This is now considered as the new standard scheme by the EORTC.

Combined Modality Treatment of Anal Carcinoma.

Within the framework of two phase III clinical trials, the superior results of concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy in the treatment of patients with locally advanced anal carcinoma were demonstrated. A further phase III clinical trial showed that the role of mitomycin C as part of the concomitant chemotherapy in combination with 5-fluorouracil appeared to be essential in obtaining a higher local control rate. All three of these randomized trials have shown that this improved local control rate results in a reduction of the colostomy rate. The standard treatment for locally advanced anal carcinoma is therefore the concomitant use of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Future issues to be clarified include a search for the optimal radiation dose and the use of less toxic agents. For smaller tumors, the addition of chemotherapy still has to be assessed.

Final results of a phase III clinical trial on adjuvant intraportal infusion with heparin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in resectable colon cancer (EORTC GITCCG 1983-1987). European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Cooperative Group.

In this phase III clinical trial conducted by the Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Cooperative Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (GITCCG-EORTC), we evaluated the effect of adjuvant intraportal infusion of heparin (HEP) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) on overall survival, disease-free survival and time to progression in patients with resectable colon cancer. From January 1983 to June 1987, 235 patients were randomised from 14 institutions in seven European countries: 79 patients made up the control group (control): 72 the portal vein infusion group given heparin alone (5000 IU daily x 7 consecutive days) (HEP); 84 the portal vein infusion group given heparin (5000 IU daily x 7 consecutive days) and 5-FU (500 mg/m2 daily x 7 consecutive days) (HEP/5-FU); 34 patients were considered ineligible. The 199 patients considered eligible were well balanced for age, sex, Karnofsky index, tumour location, surgery, surgical procedure and Dukes' stage. Four patients (2 control, 1 HEP, 1 HEP/5-FU) died of surgical complications. No differences were observed between control group and treatment groups (HEP, HEP/5-FU) for postoperative complications and number of hospitalisation days. Severe toxicity (grade 3-4, WHO) was found in 12% of patients in the HEP group and 8% in the HEP/5-FU group. After a median follow-up of 9 years, disease progression was reported in 40% of patients in the control group, 40% in the HEP group and 29% in the HEP/5-FU group. Five-year survival, time to progression and disease-free survival were 69%, 58% and 56%, respectively, in the control arm, 61%, 58% and 56% in the HEP arm, and 71%, 69% and 65% in the HEP/5-FU arm. Based on all randomised patients, the effect of treatment was not statistically significant with respect to any of the endpoints. It is confirmed that intraportal 5-FU infusion is safe and has a tolerable toxicity, but cannot be considered standard treatment for patients with resectable colon cancer.

Concomitant radiotherapy and chemotherapy is superior to radiotherapy alone in the treatment of locally advanced anal cancer: results of a phase III randomized trial of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Radiotherapy and Gastrointestinal Cooperative Groups.

PURPOSE: To investigate the potential gain of the concomitant use of radiotherapy and chemotherapy in improving local control and reducing the need for colostomy, a randomized phase III trial was performed in patients with locally advanced anal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1987 to 1994, 110 patients were randomized between radiotherapy alone and a combination of radiotherapy and chemotherapy. The patients had T3-4NO-3 or T1-2N1-3 anal cancer. Radiotherapy consisted of 45 Gy given in 5 weeks, with a daily dose of 1.8 Gy. After a rest period of 6 weeks, a boost of 20 or 15 Gy was given in case of partial or complete response, respectively. Surgical resection as part of the primary treatment was performed if possible in patients who had not responded 6 weeks after 45 Gy or with residual palpable disease after the completion of treatment. Chemotherapy was given during radiotherapy: 750 mg/m2 daily fluorouracil as a continuous infusion on days 1 to 5 and 29 to 33, and a single dose of mitomycin 15 mg/m2 administered on day 1. RESULTS: The addition of chemotherapy to radiotherapy resulted in a significant increase in the complete remission rate from 54% for radiotherapy alone to 80% for radiotherapy and chemotherapy, and from 85% to 96%, respectively, if results are considered after surgical resections. This led to a significant improvement of locoregional control and colostomy-free interval (P = .02 and P = .002, respectively), both in favor of the combined modality treatment. The locoregional control rate improved by 18% at 5 years, while the colostomy-free rate at that time increased by 32% by the addition of chemotherapy to radiotherapy. No significant difference was found when severe side effects were considered, although anal ulcers were more frequently observed in the combined-treatment arm. The survival rate remained similar in both treatment arms. Skin ulceration, nodal involvement, and sex were the most important prognostic factors for both local control and survival. These remained significant after multivariate analysis. The improvement seen in local control by adding chemotherapy to radiotherapy also remained significant after adjusting for prognostic factors in the multivariate analysis. Event-free survival, defined as free of locoregional progression, no colostomy, and no severe side effects or death, showed significant improvement (P = .03) in favor of the combined-treatment modality. The 5-year survival rate was 56% for the whole patient group. CONCLUSION: The concomitant use of radiotherapy and chemotherapy resulted in a significantly improved locoregional control rate and a reduction of the need for colostomy in patients with locally advanced anal cancer without a significant increase in late side effects.

Age is not a limiting factor for radical radiotherapy in pelvic malignancies.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Pelvic radiotherapy (RT) toxicity in the elderly is poorly documented. We developed a study aiming to evaluate whether or not a limit of age could be identified beyond which toxicities in patients receiving pelvic RT were more frequent or more severe. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 1619 patients with pelvic cancers enrolled in nine EORTC trials, RT arms, were retrospectively studied. Patients were split into six age ranges from 50 years to 70 years and over. Survivals and late toxicity occurrence were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method and comparison between age groups with the logrank test. A trend test was done to examine if chronological age had an impact on acute toxicity occurrence. RESULTS: Survival was comparable in each age group for prostate (P = 0.18), uterus (0.41), anal canal cancer (P = 0.6) and slightly better for the younger group of rectum cancer (P = 0.04). A total of 1722 acute and 514 late grade > or = 1 were recorded. Acute nausea/ vomiting, skin complications and performance status deterioration were significantly more frequent in younger patients. There was no trend toward more aged patients to experience diarrhea (P = 0.149) and after adjustment on RT dose, acute urinary complications were observed equally in each age range (P = 0.32). Eighty percent of patients were free of late complication at 5 years in each age range (P = 0.79). For the grade > 2 late side-effects, a plateau was observed after 1 year at near 9% without any difference (P = 0.06) nor trend (P = 0.13) between age-groups. CONCLUSION: Age per se is not a limiting factor for radical radiotherapy in pelvic malignancies.