Efatutazone, an oral PPAR-γ agonist, in combination with paclitaxel in anaplastic thyroid cancer: results of a multicenter phase 1 trial.

PURPOSE: A phase 1 study was initiated to determine the safety, potential effectiveness, and maximal tolerated dose and recommended phase 2 dose of efatutazone and paclitaxel in anaplastic thyroid cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients received efatutazone (0.15, 0.3, or 0.5 mg) orally twice daily and then paclitaxel every 3 weeks. Patient tolerance and outcomes were assessed, as were serum efatutazone pharmacokinetics. RESULTS: Ten of 15 patients were women. Median age was 59 years. Seven patients received 0.15 mg of efatutazone, 6 patients received 0.3 mg, and 2 patients received 0.5 mg. One patient receiving 0.3 mg of efatutazone had a partial response from day 69 to day 175; 7 patients attained stable disease. Median times to progression were 48 and 68 days in patients receiving 0.15 mg of efatutazone and 0.3 mg of efatutazone, respectively; corresponding median survival was 98 vs 138 days. The median peak efatutazone blood level was 8.6 ng/mL for 0.15-mg dosing vs 22.0 ng/mL for 0.3-mg twice daily dosing. Ten patients had grade 3 or greater adverse events (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events), with 2 of these (anemia and edema) related to efatutazone. Thirteen events of edema were reported in 8 patients, with 2 of grade 3 or greater. Eight patients had ≥1 serious adverse event, with 1 of these (anemia) attributed to efatutazone and 1 (anaphylactic reaction) related to paclitaxel. The maximal tolerated dose was not achieved. Angiopoietin-like 4 was induced by efatutazone in tissue biopsy samples of 2 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Efatutazone and paclitaxel in combination were safe and tolerated and had biologic activity.

Phase I trial of concurrent tirapazamine, cisplatin, and radiotherapy in patients with advanced head and neck cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose of tirapazamine when combined with cisplatin and radiation in patients with T3/4 and/or N2/3 squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The starting schedule was conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (70 Gy in 7 weeks) with concomitant cisplatin 75 mg/m2 and tirapazamine 290 mg/m2 (before cisplatin) in weeks 1, 4, and 7 and tirapazamine alone 160 mg/m2 three times a week in weeks 2, 3, 5, and 6. Positron emission tomography scans for tumor hypoxia (18F misonidazole) were performed before and during radiotherapy. RESULTS: We treated 16 patients with predominantly oropharyngeal primary tumors, including 10 patients with T4 or N3 disease. Febrile neutropenia occurred toward the end of radiotherapy in three out of six patients treated on the initial dose level. Two of these patients also developed grade 4 acute radiation reactions. Another 10 patients were treated with the same doses, but the week 5 and week 6 tirapazamine doses were omitted. This resulted in less neutropenia and only one dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) (febrile neutropenia), and eight out of 10 patients completed treatment without any dose omissions. In these 10 patients, the acute radiation toxicities were not obviously enhanced compared with chemoradiotherapy regimens using concurrent platinum and fluorouracil. 18F misonidazole scans detected hypoxia in 14 of 15 patients at baseline, with only one patient having detectable hypoxia at the end of treatment. With a median follow-up of 2.7 years, the 3-year failure-free survival rate was 69% (SE, 12%), the 3-year local progression-free rate was 88% (SE, 8%), and the 3-year overall survival rate was 69% (SE, 12%). CONCLUSION: DLT was due unexpectedly to febrile neutropenia, which could be overcome by omitting tirapazamine in weeks 5 and 6. The combination of tirapazamine, cisplatin, and radiotherapy resulted in remarkably good and durable clinical responses in patients with very advanced head and neck cancers. It warrants further investigation.

Comparison of urinary desmosine excretion in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or cystic fibrosis.

Neutrophil elastase is involved in the pathogenesis of several pulmonary diseases; a strategy for monitoring in vivo elastase activity is to measure changes in biochemical markers. The objective of this study was to determine whether differences in the urinary excretion of the elastin crosslinks, desmosine and isodesmosine (which are unique amino acid products of elastase activity), could be discerned between groups of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or cystic fibrosis (CF), and non-diseased, age-matched controls. Twenty-four-hour urine collections were analysed to eliminate variations in excretion throughout the day, and urine was collected on four separate days in 29-31 subjects/group to investigate the variability in desmosines excretion among the groups. Both sets of patient populations had significantly more variable desmosines readings (higher standard deviations) relative to their respective age-matched control group. The means for three adult groups (COPD, controls and a COPD-smoker subset) ranged from 28.4 to 35.5 pmol desmosines/mg creatinine and there were no differences among the groups. Values in children were higher: 55 pmol desmosines/mg creatinine in the non-CF children and 77 pmol desmosines/mg creatinine for the CF group (P<0.01 vs. age-matched controls). The results of this study show that urinary desmosines, as a surrogate marker for enhanced elastase activity, are more highly variant in both patient populations relative to age-matched controls, and an overall increase in the mean value is further observed in patients with cystic fibrosis.

Tirapazamine plus cisplatin versus cisplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A report of the international CATAPULT I study group. Cisplatin and Tirapazamine in Subjects with Advanced Previously Untreated Non-Small-Cell Lung Tumors.

PURPOSE: A phase III trial, Cisplatin and Tirapazamine in Subjects with Advanced Previously Untreated Non-Small-Cell Lung Tumors (CATAPULT I), was designed to determine the efficacy and safety of tirapazamine plus cisplatin for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with previously untreated NSCLC were randomized to receive either tirapazamine (390 mg/m(2) infused over 2 hours) followed 1 hour later by cisplatin (75 mg/m(2) over 1 hour) or 75 mg/m(2) of cisplatin alone, every 3 weeks for a maximum of eight cycles. RESULTS: A total of 446 patients with NSCLC (17% with stage IIIB disease and pleural effusions; 83% with stage IV disease) were entered onto the study. Karnofsky performance status (KPS) was >/= 60 for all patients (for 10%, KPS = 60; for 90%, KPS = 70 to 100). Sixty patients (14%) had clinically stable brain metastases. The median survival was significantly longer (34.6 v 27. 7 weeks; P =.0078) and the response rate was significantly greater (27.5% v 13.7%; P <.001) for patients who received tirapazamine plus cisplatin (n = 218) than for those who received cisplatin alone (n = 219). The tirapazamine-plus-cisplatin regimen was associated with mild to moderate adverse events, including acute, reversible hearing loss, reversible, intermittent muscle cramping, diarrhea, skin rash, nausea, and vomiting. There were no incremental increases in myelosuppression, peripheral neuropathy, or renal, hepatic, or cardiac toxicity and no deaths related to tirapazamine. CONCLUSION: The CATAPULT I study shows that tirapazamine enhances the activity of cisplatin in patients with advanced NSCLC and confirms that hypoxia is an exploitable therapeutic target in human malignancies.

Phase I trial of the hypoxic cell cytotoxin tirapazamine with concurrent radiation therapy in the treatment of refractory solid tumors.

PURPOSE: Patients with refractory solid tumors were treated with the combination of fractionated radiation therapy and multiple-dose intravenous tirapazamine to determine the toxicities and maximum tolerated dose of tirapazamine when given concurrently with radiation therapy. METHODS: Patients received radiation therapy in accordance with standard treatment practice in relation to fraction size and number of fractions for their particular cancer. In all cases, the course of radiation therapy exceeded the time of tirapazamine administration. Initially, tirapazamine was administered 5 days per week for 2 weeks for a total of 10 doses. After the first 8 patients, the schedule was changed to 3 times per week (Monday, Wednesday, Friday) for 4 weeks for a total of 12 doses. Between 3 and 6 patients were treated at each dose level. RESULTS: A total of 43 patients were treated in the study between 1991 and 1995. All patients were 18 years old or older, had a Karnofsky performance status of > or = 60% and had adequate hematologic, hepatic, and renal function. Dose escalation began at 9 mg/m(2)/dose and was increased using a modified Fibonacci schema. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached and dose escalation was stopped at 260 mg/m(2) because of other data that became available suggesting 330 mg/m(2) was associated with dose-limiting toxicity (1, 2). CONCLUSION: Tirapazamine in doses of up to 260 mg/m(2) times 12 doses can be given safely with fractionated radiation therapy. This dose appears to result in adequate plasma exposure (2) for radiation sensitization, and this schedule is being tested in a Phase II trial by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group to determine if tirapazamine is a radiation enhancer in the clinic.

Concurrent tirapazamine and radiotherapy for advanced head and neck carcinomas: a Phase II study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of tirapazamine, a hypoxic cytotoxin, combined with conventional radiotherapy (RT) for advanced head and neck carcinomas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From Oct. 1994 to Nov. 1996, 40 patients with stage III or IV carcinomas of the head and neck were enrolled in a Phase II trial to receive conventional RT (70 Gy in 7 weeks) with concurrent tirapazamine (159 mg/m2 intravenously, 3 times per week for 12 doses). One patient subsequently withdrew from the protocol treatment, and was excluded from analyses. Among the 39 cases, the primary sites were located in the oropharynx (n = 28), supraglottic larynx (n = 6), or hypopharynx (n = 5). Twenty-seven patients had T3 or T4, and 27 had N2 or N3 disease. RESULTS: Thirty-two (82%) patients received full 12 drug doses. Thirty-two patients (82%) received full 70 Gy of RT. The most frequent drug toxicities were muscle cramps (77%) and nausea/vomiting (62%), usually grade 1 or 2. Overall, 13 patients (33%) experienced grade 3 or 4 drug-related toxicities. No excessive RT-associated acute normal tissue reactions were observed. With a median follow-up of 13 months, the 1-year and 2-year local control rate was 64% and 59% respectively. CONCLUSION: The tirapazamine regimen was well tolerated with a compliance rate of 82%. The toxicity of RT with concurrent tirapazamine was acceptable in treating advanced head and neck carcinomas. The disease control trend was encouraging. Further clinical studies are warranted.

Tirapazamine with cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II study.

PURPOSE: A phase II study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of tirapazamine combined with cisplatin for the treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-four patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC were treated with a combination of tirapazamine and cisplatin. Patients received tirapazamine 260 mg/m2 administered intravenously over 2 hours, followed 1 hour later by cisplatin 75 mg/m2 administered over an additional hour, repeated every 21 days. The duration of therapy was meant to be limited to four cycles for nonresponders and eight cycles for responders. RESULTS: Ten of 44 patients (23%) showed a partial response. The estimated median survival for all patients was 37 weeks. Toxicities were treatable and included grade 3 nausea or vomiting (25%), fatigue (27.3%), and muscle cramps (4.5%). No dose reductions were necessary. CONCLUSION: The results show that tirapazamine can safely be added to cisplatin. Both the median survival and response rate observed strongly suggest that tirapazamine with cisplatin is more active than cisplatin alone.

Tirapazamine-cisplatin: the synergy.

Tirapazamine is a novel bioreductive agent with selective cytotoxicity against hypoxic tumour cells. Synergy with cisplatin and other chemotherapeutic agents has been shown in preclinical trials. Pharmacokinetic studies of tirapazamine have revealed that exposure increases with dose over the range of 18-450 mg m(-2) for a single dose and of 9-390 mg m(-2) for multiple doses. Plasma clearance is high. Tirapazamine has been clinically tested in combination with cisplatin at escalating doses in a phase I trial and at therapeutic doses in three separate phase II trials in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in 11 study centres. Limiting toxicity for tirapazamine at an intravenous dose of 390 mg m(-2) was acute, reversible hearing loss. Other frequently observed side-effects included muscle cramping and gastrointestinal symptoms. Tirapazamine did not cause myelosuppression, and no toxic deaths were reported in these trials. The anti-tumour efficacy against previously untreated, advanced NSCLC was evaluated by cumulative intent-to-treat analysis of 132 patients. The objective response rate (confirmed by two independent measurements) was 25% [confidence interval (CI) 17.8-33.33], with a median survival of 38.9 weeks (CI 29.4-49.9). The efficacy of tirapazamine plus cisplatin shown in these trials was better than that of historical controls with cisplatin monotherapy. Two large-scale international trials have been conducted, involving more than 70 centres, to confirm these results. The CATAPULT I trial compares tirapazamine plus cisplatin with cisplatin and has finished accrual with 446 patients. The CATAPULT II trial, which is comparing tirapazamine plus cisplatin with etoposide plus cisplatin, had enrolled 550 patients by June 1997. Follow-up is ongoing. Tirapazamine is the promising first drug from a new class of cytotoxic agents with a novel mechanism of action. It can be effectively combined with cisplatin, and possibly with other agents, because of its safety profile and lack of overlapping dose-limiting toxicity, such as myelosuppression. The combination of tirapazamine and cisplatin appears to be safe and effective in the treatment of NSCLC.

Phase I study of tirapazamine and cisplatin in patients with recurrent cervical cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Tirapazamine (SR 4233) is a benzotriazine compound exhibiting substantial differential toxicity for hypoxic cells. A large enhancement in tumor cell killing has been demonstrated in preclinical studies when tirapazamine was combined with cisplatin. This phase I study was undertaken to establish a safe dose combination of tirapazamine and cisplatin when administered to patients with recurrent cervical carcinoma. METHODS: Tirapazamine was administered as an intravenous infusion over 2 hr, followed 1 hr later by cisplatin intravenously over 1 hr, every 21 days. All patients received prophylactic antiemetics consisting of ondansetron, dexamethasone, and lorazepam. The planned dose escalation levels of tirapazamine were 195, 260, 330, and 390 mg/m2. The cisplatin dose was fixed at 75 mg/m2. RESULTS: A total of 12 patients were treated with 43 courses of therapy. Patients were heavily pretreated. Eleven of the 12 had prior radiotherapy and 5 of the 12 had prior cisplatin-based chemotherapy. A maximally tolerated dose of 330 mg/m2 was defined for this patient population. The dose-limiting toxicity was nausea and vomiting. All 12 patients were also evaluated for response. Two major responses were seen (17%). In addition, there were three minor responses (25%) and 4 patients achieved disease stabilization (33%). All major and minor responses were seen at the highest dose level tested of 330 mg/m2. CONCLUSIONS: Tirapazamine and cisplatin is an interesting drug combination in the treatment of cervical cancer. Phase II testing is planned.

Phase II trial of tirapazamine combined with cisplatin in chemotherapy of advanced malignant melanoma.

PURPOSE: A phase II study was undertaken to determine the efficacy of tirapazamine (TPZ) combined with cisplatin (cDDP) in patients with metastatic melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between June 1994 and November 1995, 48 patients with metastatic melanoma were treated with TPZ (260 mg/m2, administered intravenously over two hours) followed in one-hour by cDDP (75 mg/m2 over one hour) every 21 days. Sixteen patients had received prior chemotherapy, and 13 of these had failed to respond to prior cDDP. None of the patients had symptomatic brain metastasis. RESULTS: Nine patients had partial responses, with an overall response rate of 19% (95% confidence interval (95% CI) of 9%-33%). The median duration of response was six months. None of the responders had received prior chemotherapy. Responses were seen in 8 (33%, confidence interval of 16%-55%) of 24 patients with primary cutaneous melanoma who had received no prior chemotherapy and in the only patient with previously untreated conjunctival melanoma. There were no responders among the seven patients with choroidal melanoma and 16 patients with previously treated cutaneous melanoma. Two patients with partial responses were rendered free of gross disease surgically three months after completing eight courses of TPZ-cDDP; they remain free of tumor recurrence. Responses were seen in lymph nodes (27%), lung (26%), skin (20%), adrenal gland (20%), soft tissues (17%) and liver (17%). Common toxicities included muscle cramps, fatigue, gastrointestinal effects and peripheral neuropathy. Fatigue, nausea, vomiting, anorexia, and muscle cramps were grade 3 or 4 in less than 10% of the courses. Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were rare. CONCLUSION: The TPZ-cDDP combination has definite activity against chemotherapy-naïve patients with cutaneous melanoma and warrant further studies in combination with other cytotoxic agents.

Phase I trial of tirapazamine in combination with cisplatin in a single dose every 3 weeks in patients with solid tumors.

PURPOSE AND METHODS: Tirapazamine (SR4233, WIN 59075) is a benzotriazine-di-N-oxide bioreductive agent that is selectively activated to a reactive DNA-damaging species in hypoxic tumors. Preclinical studies show that synergistic antitumor activity results from a schedule-dependent interaction between tirapazamine and several cytotoxic drug classes, including cisplatin. In a phase I combination study, tirapazamine (130 to 260 mg/m2) was administered as a 1-hour intravenous (IV) infusion beginning 3 hours before cisplatin (75 to 100 mg/m2). Thirteen patients received 41 courses of therapy. These patients had an excellent performance status and were not heavily pretreated. The predominant diagnosis was lung cancer. RESULTS: The major acute side effects were nausea and vomiting, which were controlled with an intensive antiemetic regimen. Other acute effects included diarrhea and muscle cramping, while with repeated dosing, anorexia and fatigue predominated. Full doses of each agent were well tolerated in combination, although in this previously treated population, fatigue increased markedly after three cycles of therapy. Partial responses were observed in two patients (one with non-small-cell lung cancer and one with breast cancer), and a minor response occurred in a patient with mesothelioma. Tirapazamine pharmacokinetics were linear with respect to increasing dose with a mean maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of 5.97 +/- 2.25 microg/mL and an area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of 811.4 +/- 311.9 microg/mL.min at 260 mg/m2. These results are consistent with other ongoing single-agent and combination studies and indicate that therapeutically relevant levels of tirapazamine are achievable in patients based on animal models. The mean cisplatin AUC was 285.6 +/- 46.4 microg/mL.min with mean Cmax values of 3.38 +/- 0.43 microg/mL at 75 mg/m2. The clearance of cisplatin was unaffected by coadministration with tirapazamine. CONCLUSION: This trial shows that in previously treated patients, full doses of cisplatin are well tolerated with increasing doses of tirapazamine up to 260 mg/m2. The observation of clinical responses in this trial supports the phase II investigation of this regimen.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of tirapazamine (SR 4233) administered every three weeks.

Tirapazamine (SR 4233; 3-amino-1,2,4-benzotriazine-1,4-di-N-oxide) is a bioreductive agent exhibiting up to 200 x greater toxicity for hypoxic cells as compared to oxygenated cells. In murine studies, a selective increase in tumor kill was observed when tirapazamine was coadministered with other agents, notably cisplatin. A Phase I study of single-agent tirapazamine administered i.v. every 3 weeks was conducted to determine the toxicity of a schedule for use with systemic chemotherapy. A total of 28 patients were given 50 courses of tirapazamine at doses ranging from 36-450 mg/m2. No tumor responses were observed. Reversible deafness and tinnitus were dose-limiting, with ototoxicity observed in 1 of 6 patients treated at 330 mg/m2, 1 of 4 patients treated at 390 mg/m2, and 3 of 3 patients treated at 450 mg/m2. Muscle cramps, nausea, and vomiting were also observed. Pharmacokinetic studies revealed a greater than dose-proportional increase in the area under the plasma concentration x time curve (AUCs) of the two major metabolites. Patients who developed ototoxicity generally showed higher plasma AUC values for the parent drug and metabolites. The mean plasma tirapazamine AUC at 330 mg/m2 was 1026.5 microgram/ml x min (range 863. 8-1252.3), but no pharmacokinetic data are available for the solitary patient who developed otoxicity at this dose level. These AUC values were in the (estimated) range required for therapeutic effect in murine studies. Ototoxicity was not observed when the AUC of tirapazamine was equal to or less than 1252 microgram/ml x min. The dose of 330 mg/m2 was therefore chosen as an appropriate level for combination chemotherapy studies.

Pharmacokinetics of the hypoxic cell cytotoxic agent tirapazamine and its major bioreductive metabolites in mice and humans: retrospective analysis of a pharmacokinetically guided dose-escalation strategy in a phase I trial.

Tirapazamine (3-amino-1,2,4-benzotriazine-1,4-di-N-oxide; SR 259075) is a selective hypoxic cell cytotoxic agent that is bioreductively activated in tumours to a reactive-drug free radical. Preclinically the agent has been shown to possess additive and synergistic anti-tumour activity in combination with radiotherapy and chemotherapy regimens. In the present study the pharmacokinetics and metabolism of tirapazamine were investigated in mice and patients as part of pre-clinical and phase I investigations. The objectives of this work were twofold; firstly, to evaluate retrospectively the utility of a pharmacokinetically guided dose-escalation (PGDE) strategy for tirapazamine, and secondly, to investigate if pharmacologically relevant plasma concentrations could be achieved at tolerable doses. Pharmacokinetic studies for PGDE were conducted in mice at four dose levels ranging from one-tenth of the LD10 to the LD50. The AUC at the LD10 (2932 micrograms ml-1 min) was used to determine a target AUC value of 1173 micrograms ml-1 min (equivalent to 40% of the mouse LD10 AUC) for clinical studies. A phase I study to investigate the tolerance of a single i.v. infusion of tirapazamine (once every 3 weeks) was initiated with close pharmacokinetic monitoring. The starting dose (36 mg/m2) was based on toxicity data obtained in the mouse, rat and dog. Doses were escalated by increases in the volume and duration of infusion. A retrospective analysis of the pharmacokinetic and toxicity data was then made to determine the utility of a PGDE approach. The drug exhibited a steep dose-lethality relationship in mice (LD10 294 mg/m2, LD50 303 mg/m2). The major gross toxicities were body-weight loss (15-20%), pilo-erection and hypoactivity at all dose levels. Sporadic ptosis and conjunctivitis were observed at doses of > 300 mg/m2. The plasma elimination of tirapazamine fitted a monoexponential open model, with rapid elimination from the plasma (t1/2 = 36 +/- 0.65 min) occurring at the LD10 dose of 294 mg/m2. A 10.3-fold increase in dose resulted in a 25.0-fold increase in AUC. Clinically, doses were escalated over the range of 36-450 mg/m2. Ototoxicity (tinnitus and reversible hearing loss) was dose-limiting at 450 mg/m2 and the MTD was 390 mg/m2 for this schedule. Pharmacokinetic analyses in patients revealed that the elimination of tirapazamine in patients was generally bi-phasic, with low inter-patient variability being found in clearance. A 12.5-fold increase in dose resulted in a 19.0-fold increase in AUC. There was good quantitative agreement in metabolite formation between mice and humans with respect to the two- and four-electron bioreductive metabolites. AUC values recorded for tirapazamine at the MTD of 390 mg/m2 (range 1035-1611 micrograms ml-1 min) were similar to the target AUC in mice. Importantly, these levels are consistent with the levels required for radiation-dose enhancement and effective combination with cisplatin in mice. Given (a) the similarities in plasma pharmacokinetics and metabolism observed at the target AUC/MTD in mice, rats, dogs and humans, (b) the similar degree of plasma protein binding seen between species and (c) the relatively low inter-patient variability noted in drug clearance, a successful PGDE approach should have been feasible. The results also indicate that potentially therapeutic levels of tirapazamine are achievable in patients at tolerable doses.

Phase II study of the combination of the novel bioreductive agent, tirapazamine, with cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Tirapazamine is a bioreductive compound synergistic with cisplatin in preclinical testing. This phase II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of tirapazamine with cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty patients with unresectable stage III-B and IV non-small-cell lung cancer who had not received prior chemotherapy were given tirapazamine (390 mg/m2) intravenously (i.v.) over two hours followed one hour later by cisplatin (75 mg/m2) i.v. over one hour every 21 days. RESULTS: Five of 20 patients (25%) had major objective responses (95% confidence interval, 11%-50%). Median duration of response was eight months with a one-year survival of 40%. Toxicities included temporary hearing loss (25%), muscle cramping, diarrhea, skin rash and nausea/vomiting. No grade 3 or 4 hematologic or renal toxicity was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of tirapazamine plus cisplatin appears to be safe and active in the treatment of advanced non-small lung cancer without a substantial increase in toxicity compared to cisplatin alone. A phase III randomized study compared the combination to cisplatin alone has completed accrual. Further evaluation of tirapazamine with other active agents and in multi-modality therapy is warranted.

Metabolic characterization of human soft tissue sarcomas in vivo and in vitro using proton-decoupled phosphorus magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

We applied 1H-decoupling and nuclear Overhauser enhancement to obtain well-resolved 31P magnetic resonance spectra accurately localized to 20 soft tissue sarcomas in vivo, using three-dimensional chemical shift imaging. Fifteen spectra had large phosphomonoester signals (21% of total phosphorus) that contained high amounts of phosphoethanolamine (compared to those of phosphocholine) but no signals from glycerophosphoethanolamine, and glycerophosphocholine was detected in only four cases. Prominent nucleoside triphosphates (52% of phosphorus) and low inorganic phosphate (10% of phosphorus) indicated that a large fraction of these 15 sarcomas contained viable cells, and this impression was confirmed histologically in 13 of the sarcomas. High-resolution in vitro 31P spectra of extracts of surgical specimens of four of the sarcomas studied in vivo and six additional sarcomas confirmed the in vivo assignments of metabolites and revealed considerable inter- and intratumoral variations of metabolite concentrations associated with histological variations in the relative amounts of cells and of matrix materials or spontaneous necrosis. Seven sarcomas, all high grade with pleomorphic or round cells rather than spindle cells, contained an unidentified phosphodiester signal in vivo; its absence in the extract spectra indicates that it may be from an abnormally mobile membrane component. We have documented a means to obtain new information about in vivo metabolism in human sarcomas and to provide a basis on which to examine the uses of 31P magnetic resonance spectroscopy in the clinical management of sarcomas.

Intravesical recombinant tumor necrosis factor in the treatment of superficial bladder cancer: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study.

We tested and proved the safety of recombinant human tumor necrosis factor given intravesically weekly for 11 weeks (dwell time 2 hours) for the treatment of superficial bladder cancer in 8 men and 1 woman 46 to 87 years old (mean age 69 years). Cohorts of 3 patients received 200, 400 and 1,000 micrograms. recombinant human tumor necrosis factor. The maximal tolerated dose was not achieved. There were 9 episodes of urological symptoms, 8 of flu-like symptoms, 4 of headache and 3 of chest tightness. Hematological and gastrointestinal toxicities were minor, and no renal toxicity was encountered. Recombinant human tumor necrosis factor was safe to administer at doses up to 1,000 micrograms. We hope that recombinant human tumor necrosis factor in conjunction with other antitumor agents will lead to a new, effective treatment for superficial bladder cancer.

Muscle cramping in phase I clinical trials of tirapazamine (SR 4233) with and without radiation.

PURPOSE: Tirapazamine (SR 4233) is a benzotriazine di-N-oxide which acts as a hypoxic cytotoxic agent and as a radiation enhancer when given shortly before or after radiation. Three Phase I clinical trials were designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose, toxicities, pharmacokinetics, and effects on irradiated tumors and normal tissues. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Tirapazamine 9 mg/m2 to 21 mg/m2 was given i.v. 1/2 to 1 h prior to irradiation on a multiple dose schedule of 10 consecutive doses. This was later revised to a three times-per-week schedule for 12 doses. In a second clinical trial, tirapazamine was given in a single dose of 18 mg/m2 to 293 mg/m2 i.v. after irradiation. In a third trial, tirapazamine was administered without irradiation in single doses of 36 mg/m2 to 250 mg/m2, with an option for retreatment. RESULTS: Subjects reported muscle cramping of varying degrees of severity on all three dose schedules. One patient experienced Grade 3 cramping and treatment was discontinued. The most frequent site of cramping were the lower extremities. Creatine phosphokinase (CPK) values were elevated in three patients with associated muscle soreness in one patient. MB (cardiac) isoenzymes were elevated in one patient with no evidence of cardiac muscle damage, and returned to baseline at drug completion. No consistent abnormalities in clinical laboratory values were found. Stretching of the muscle was most effective in relieving the cramping. CONCLUSION: Muscle cramping has been the most frequently reported toxicity in Phase I studies of tirapazamine, though it does not appear to be dose limiting. Dose escalation on the three clinical trials continues. In vitro studies to investigate the cramping are ongoing.

The therapeutic index of cytotoxic chemotherapy depends upon circadian drug timing.

Cytotoxic drug doses and schedules used to administer anticancer treatments are by necessity a balance between excessive toxicity to the host and antitumor activity. Biological rhythms along daily, monthly, and annual time scales may determine cell susceptibility to cytotoxic agents as well as drug pharmacokinetics. Susceptibility rhythms have been determined for more than 20 of the most commonly used anticancer drugs in animals standardized to an artificial light/dark schedule. For these agents, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) is dependent upon the circadian time of administration. Differences between best and worst tolerance may exceed 50% of the median MTD. Similarly, the antitumor activity may differ depending on the treatment time. Circadian stages of maximum tumor activity and maximal host toxicity are frequently separated, allowing improved therapeutic index through optimal drug timing. Extrapolations from preclinical findings have led to clinical treatment schedules that specify times of drug delivery. To date, small randomized clinical trials comparing 2 opposite schedules (e.g., treatment given at the presumed times of best or worst drug tolerance) have shown significant toxicity differences for patients receiving cisplatin, doxorubicin or analogues, and 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine (FUDR). Toxicity advantages coincided with equal or better antitumor activity and even survival advantage for ovarian cancer patients receiving optimally timed doxorubicin/cisplatin. Current evidence allows the recommendation to administer doxorubicin in the early morning hours and cisplatin in the afternoon. Future trials need to incorporate monitoring of marker rhythm parameters in patients and individual adjustments of treatment schedules to those rhythms.

MR imaging of patients with implanted drug infusion pumps.

The influence of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging on the integrity and function of an implantable, programmable drug infusion pump and the distortion of the image by this device were tested. Six identical pumps were tested in magnetic fields of 1.5 T. Pump memory was not affected by the procedure. The pump rotor stalled (no infusion) as long as the device was within the magnetic field. Drug delivery resumed as programmed after the pump was removed from the field. No structural damage to the electrical or mechanical pump components was detected. The pump caused a circular image artifact (a signal dropout) within 8-10 cm of the device. The authors conclude that MR imaging is accurate if the area of interest is at least 10 cm from the pump, and that with awareness of temporary infusion cessation, it is safe to perform MR imaging in patients with this implanted pump.

Circadian-shaped infusions of floxuridine for progressive metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Sixty-eight unselected patients with progressive metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) were treated between March 1985 and November 1988 with continuous infusion floxuridine (FUDR). Thirty-seven percent of these patients had previously received and failed systemic treatment. Using implantable pumps for automatic drug delivery, FUDR was continuously infused for 14 days at monthly intervals. The starting dose was 0.15 mg/kg/d (intravenous [IV]; n = 61) or 0.25 mg/kg/d (intraarterial [IA]; n = 7); IV doses were increased or decreased in increments of 0.025 mg/kg/d as permitted by toxicity. Diarrhea (with or without mild abdominal cramping) and nausea/vomiting limited the FUDR IV infusion, and hepatic function abnormalities limited FUDR IA infusion. The use of a circadian-modified infusion schedule permitted high FUDR doses to be safely given as compared with a constant rate infusion schedule. Of 63 patients assessable for response, 56 received systemic FUDR infusion. Four complete responses (CRs; 7.1%); and seven partial responses (PRs; 12.5%) were observed (objective response rate, CR plus PR, 19.6 +/- 5.1% [95% confidence limits] ). The median objective response duration was 10.8 months (range, 1 to 18 months; mean, 9.4 +/- 1.6). Four additional patients had minor tumor responses (MRs; 7.1%). In a subgroup of seven assessable patients receiving hepatic arterial FUDR, we observed one CR and three PRs (57.2 +/- 42.8%). Overall, objective response (CR plus PR) was seen in a quarter of assessable patients treated, 15 of 63, while only 15 of the 63 assessable patients (25.4%) have had objective tumor progression. The median follow-up time for all 68 patients was 28 months (range, 1 to 42), and their median survival duration is 15 months (range, 3 to 37 months). Continuous infusion FUDR is an effective outpatient treatment for progressive metastatic RCC, producing durable tumor response and causing little toxicity.