Evaluation of low dose famciclovir as herpes simplex virus and varicella zoster virus prophylaxis in cytomegalovirus low-risk solid organ transplant recipients.

OBJECTIVE: Famciclovir is a recommended option for herpes simplex virus (HSV) and varicella-zoster virus (VZV) prophylaxis in cytomegalovirus (CMV) low-risk solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients in current guidelines; however there is currently no data evaluating its use in SOT recipients. We conducted a multicenter provider survey on antiviral prophylaxis in CMV low-risk SOT recipients and evaluated the efficacy and safety of once daily famciclovir antiviral prophylaxis. METHODS: Two-part analysis consisting of a national provider survey and a retrospective chart review of 78 kidney transplant recipients at a single institution. RESULTS: Providers from 45 transplant centers within the United States responded to the survey. Across all organs, acyclovir 400 mg twice daily was utilized by the majority of respondents (70.4%), with most using prophylaxis for a duration of 3 months (68.8%). No respondents reported use of famciclovir at their institution. In the retrospective review there were no documented cases of HSV/VZV/CMV infection during the 3 months of famciclovir prophylaxis, and only one patient (1.3%) later developed VZV infection at 12 months post-transplant. One patient (1.3%) required premature discontinuation of famciclovir due to concern for acute interstitial nephritis. CONCLUSION: Nationwide, the most common antiviral prophylaxis used in CMV low-risk SOT recipients is acyclovir 400 mg twice daily. Among patients receiving once daily famciclovir for CMV low-risk antiviral prophylaxis, there was no HSV/VZV/CMV infection while on prophylaxis. Once daily famciclovir may provide an effective and convenient once daily dosing regimen for antiviral prophylaxis in CMV low-risk SOT recipients.

Advances in personalized medicine and noninvasive diagnostics in solid organ transplantation.

Personalized medicine has been a mainstay and in practice in transplant pharmacotherapy since the advent of the field. Decisions pertaining to the diagnosis, selection, and monitoring of transplant pharmacotherapy are aimed toward the individual, the allograft, and the overall immunologic needs of the patient. Recent advances in pharmacogenomics, noninvasive biomarkers, and artificial intelligence (AI) technologies have the promise of transforming the way we individualize treatment and monitor allograft function. Pharmacogenomic testing can provide clinicians with additional data that can minimize toxicity and maximize therapeutic dosing in high-risk patients, leading to more informed decisions that may decrease the risk of rejection and adverse outcomes related to immunosuppressive therapies. Development of noninvasive strategies to monitor allograft function may offer safer and more convenient methods to detect allograft injury. Cell free DNA and gene expression profiling offer the potential to serve as "liquid biopsies" minimizing the risk to patients and providing clinicians with useful molecular data that may help individualize immunosuppression and rejection treatment. Use of big data in transplant and novel AI platforms, such as the iBox, hold tremendous promise in providing clinicians a "glimpse into the future" thereby allowing for a more individualized approach to immunosuppressive therapy that may minimize future adverse outcomes. Advances in diagnostics, laboratory science, and AI have made the application of personalized medicine even more tailored for solid organ transplant recipients. In this perspective, we summarize the current and emerging tools available, literature supporting use, and the horizon for future personalization of transplantation.

Immediate administration of antiviral therapy after transplantation of hepatitis C-infected livers into uninfected recipients: Implications for therapeutic planning.

The practice of transplanting hepatitis C (HCV)-infected livers into HCV-uninfected recipients has not previously been recommended in transplant guidelines, in part because of concerns over uncontrolled HCV infection of the allograft. Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) provide an opportunity to treat donor-derived HCV-infection and should be administered early in the posttransplant period. However, evidence on the safety and efficacy of an immediate DAA treatment approach, including how to manage logistical barriers surrounding timely DAA procurement, are required prior to broader use of HCV-positive donor organs. We report the results of a trial in which 14 HCV-negative patients underwent successful liver transplantation from HCV-positive donors. Nine patients received viremic (nucleic acid testing [NAT]-positive) livers and started a 12-week course of oral glecaprevir-pibrentasvir within 5 days of transplant. Five patients received livers from HCV antibody-positive nonviremic donors and were followed using a reactive approach. Survival in NAT-positive recipients is 100% at a median follow-up of 46 weeks. An immediate treatment approach for HCV NAT-positive liver transplantation into uninfected recipients is safe and efficacious. Securing payer approval for DAAs early in the posttransplant course could enable need-based allocation of HCV-positive donor organs irrespective of candidate HCV status, while averting chronic HCV allograft infection.

Solid organ transplantation in the HIV-infected patient: Guidelines from the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice.

These updated guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Community of Practice of the American Society of Transplantation review the management of transplantation in HIV-infected individuals. Transplantation has become the standard of care for patients with HIV and end-stage kidney or liver disease. Although less data exist for thoracic organ and pancreas transplantation, it is likely that transplantation is also safe and effective for these recipients as well. Despite what is typically a transient decline in CD4+ T lymphocytes, HIV remains well controlled and infection risks are similar to those of HIV-uninfected transplant recipients. The availability of effective directly active antivirals for the treatment of Hepatitis C is likely to improve outcomes in HIV and HCV co-infected individuals, a population previously noted to have decreased survival. Drug interactions remain an important consideration, and integrase inhibitor-based regimens are preferred due to the absence of interactions with calcineurin and mTOR inhibitors. Additionally, despite the use of more potent immunosuppression, rejection rates exceed those found in HIV-uninfected recipients. Ongoing research evaluating HIV-positive organ donors may provide support for utilizing these donors for HIV-positive patients in need of transplantation.

Assessing pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic risks in candidates for kidney transplantation.

PURPOSE: Pharmacotherapy concerns and other factors with a bearing on patient selection for kidney transplantation are discussed. SUMMARY: The process of selecting appropriate candidates for kidney transplantation involves multidisciplinary assessment to evaluate a patient's mental, social, physical, financial, and medical readiness for successful surgery and good posttransplantation outcomes. Transplantation pharmacists can play important roles in the recognition and stratification of pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic risks in prospective kidney transplant recipients and the identification of issues that require a mitigation strategy. Key pharmacotherapy-related issues and considerations during the risk assessment process include (1) anticoagulation concerns, (2) cytochrome P-450 isoenzyme-mediated drug interactions, (3) mental health-related medication use, (4) chronic pain-related medication use, (5) medication allergies, (6) use of hormonal contraception and replacement therapy, (7) prior or current use of immunosuppressants, (8) issues with drug absorption, (9) alcohol use, (10) tobacco use, (11) active use of illicit substances, and (12) use of herbal supplements. Important areas of nonpharmacologic risk include vaccine delivery, infection prophylaxis and treatment, and socially related factors such as nonadherent behavior, communication barriers, and financial, insurance, or transportation challenges that can compromise posttransplantation outcomes. CONCLUSION: Consensus opinions of practitioners in transplantation pharmacy regarding the pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic factors that should be considered in assessing candidates for kidney transplantation are presented.

Evaluation of Low- Versus High-dose Valganciclovir for Prevention of Cytomegalovirus Disease in High-risk Renal Transplant Recipients.

BACKGROUND: Despite proven efficacy of prolonged cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis using valganciclovir 900 mg/day, some centers use 450 mg/day due to reported success and cost savings. This multicenter, retrospective study compared the efficacy and safety of 6 months of low-dose versus high-dose valganciclovir prophylaxis in high-risk, donor-positive/recipient-negative, renal transplant recipients (RTR). METHODS: Two hundred thirty-seven high-risk RTR (low-dose group = valganciclovir 450 mg/day [n = 130]; high-dose group = valganciclovir 900 mg/day [n = s7]) were evaluated for 1-year CMV disease prevalence. Breakthrough CMV, resistant CMV, biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), graft loss, opportunistic infections (OI), new-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT), premature valganciclovir discontinuation, renal function and myelosuppression were also assessed. RESULTS: Patient demographics and transplant characteristics were comparable. Induction and maintenance immunosuppression were similar, except for more early steroid withdrawal in the high-dose group. Similar proportions of patients developed CMV disease (14.6% vs 24.3%; P = 0.068); however, controlling CMV risk factor differences through multivariate logistic regression revealed significantly lower CMV disease in the low-dose group (P = 0.02; odds ratio, 0.432, 95% confidence interval, 0.211-0.887). Breakthrough and resistant CMV occurred at similar frequencies. There was no difference in renal function or rates of biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss, opportunistic infections, or new-onset diabetes after transplantation. The high-dose group had significantly lower mean white blood cell counts at months 5 and 6; however, premature valganciclovir discontinuation rates were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose and high-dose valganciclovir regimens provide similar efficacy in preventing CMV disease in high-risk RTR, with a reduced incidence of leukopenia associated with the low-dose regimen and no difference in resistant CMV. Low-dose valganciclovir may provide a significant cost avoidance benefit.

Renal transplantation in the setting of early steroid withdrawal: a comparison of rabbit antithymocyte globulin induction dosing in two eras.

BACKGROUND: Modern immunosuppression and rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) have facilitated the success of early steroid withdrawal (ESW) protocols. Little data exist on optimal rATG dosing in ESW protocols. METHODS: Rejection at 12 months in era 1 (four doses of rATG, 1.25 mg/kg) vs. era 2 (three doses of rATG, 1.25 mg/kg) was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included patient and graft survival, renal function and infectious complications. Factors associated with rejection at 1 year were identified. RESULTS: 199 patients received rATG induction and ESW: 102 in era 1 and 97 in era 2. Compared to era 1, era 2 was not associated with worse outcomes, including rejection, renal function, infection or graft survival. Rejection at 1 year and uncensored graft survival differed between the dosing groups. Rejection rates were significantly higher in the <4 mg/kg group compared to the 4-5.9-mg/kg and the ≥6-mg/kg groups, whereas uncensored graft survival was the lowest in the ≥6-mg/kg group. Factors associated with rejection at 12 months included: rATG dose received of 4-5.9 versus <4 mg/kg (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.036-0.85, p = 0.026); recipient age (per year, OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.89-1.0, p = 0.038); panel reactive antibody 10-79.9 versus <10% (OR 5.4, 95% CI 1.2-25, p = 0.030) and rATG dose held (OR 4.0, 95% CI 1.0-15, p = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: A comparison of rATG dosing based on era did not result in a significant difference in rejection, renal function, infection or graft survival. However, when evaluating the study population based on actual dose received there were notable differences in both rejection rates and uncensored graft survival.

Drug-drug interactions between antiretroviral and immunosuppressive agents in HIV-infected patients after solid organ transplantation: a review.

Since the introduction of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) resulting in the prolonged survival of HIV-infected patients, HIV infection is no longer considered to be a contraindication for solid organ transplantation (SOT). The combined management of antiretroviral and immunosuppressive therapy proved to be extremely challenging, as witnessed by high rates of allograft rejection and drug toxicity, but the profound drug-drug interactions between immunosuppressants and cART, especially protease inhibitors (PIs) also play an important role. Caution and frequent drug level monitoring of calcineurin inhibitors, such as tacrolimus are necessary when PIs are (re)introduced or withdrawn in HIV-infected recipients. Furthermore, the pharmacokinetics of glucocorticoids and mTOR inhibitors are seriously affected by PIs. With the introduction of integrase inhibitors, CCR5-antagonists and fusion inhibitors which cause significantly less pharmacokinetic interactions, have minor overlapping toxicity, and offer the advantage of pharmacodynamic synergy, it is time to revaluate what may be considered the optimal antiretroviral regimen in SOT recipients. In this review we provide a brief overview of the recent success of SOT in the HIV population, and an update on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between currently available cART and immunosuppressants in HIV-infected patients, who underwent SOT.

Liver transplant center risk tolerance.

Recent changes in Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) condition for participation, using benchmark volume/outcomes requirements for certification, have been implemented. Consequently, the ability of a transplant center to assess its risk tolerance is important in successful management. An analysis of SRTR data was performed to determine donor/recipient risk factors for graft loss or patient death in the first year. Each transplant performed was then assigned a prospective relative risk (RR) of failure. Using a Monte-Carlo simulation, transplants were selected at random that met the centers' acceptable risk tolerance. Transplant center volume was fixed and its risk tolerance was adjusted to determine the impact on outcomes. The model was run 1000 times on centers with varying volume. The modeling demonstrates that centers with smaller annual volumes must use a more risk taking strategy than larger volume centers to avoid being flagged for CMS volume requirements. The modeling also demonstrates optimal risk taking strategies for centers based upon volume to minimize the probability of being flagged for not meeting volume or outcomes benchmarks. Small volume centers must perform higher risk transplants to meet current CMS requirements and are at risk for adverse action secondary to chance alone.

Belatacept: a new biologic and its role in kidney transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: To review the pharmacology, efficacy, safety, and role of belatacept in maintenance immunosuppression in adult kidney transplant recipients (KTR). DATA SOURCES: PubMed, EMBASE, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, Web of Knowledge (1990-November 2011), and Google were searched using the terms belatacept, kidney or renal, and transplant. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Relevant articles (English language and human subjects) were reviewed. Selected studies included 3 Phase 2 and 2 Phase 3 trials. Data were compared with Food and Drug Administration (FDA) briefing documents and belatacept full prescribing information. DATA SYNTHESIS: Belatacept, a cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4-immunoglobulin, is the first marketed intravenous maintenance immunosuppressant. It is approved for use in combination with basiliximab induction, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids to prevent rejection in adult KTR. Belatacept exhibits linear pharmacokinetics and first-order elimination. The less intensive regimen used in Phase 3 trials is approved by the FDA. In low-moderate immunologic risk KTR, short-term patient and allograft survival appear comparable with that seen with cyclosporine, with improved renal function despite more frequent and severe early acute rejection. Preliminary data from Phase 2 corticosteroid-avoidance and conversion trials suggest that better renal function, acceptable rejection rates, and comparable patient and allograft survival may be achieved with belatacept compared with calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs). Common adverse effects of belatacept include anemia, neutropenia, urinary tract infection, headache, and peripheral edema. While a more favorable cardiovascular and metabolic profile and lack of requirement for therapeutic drug monitoring are attractive, a higher frequency of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder is concerning. Belatacept drug costs are significantly higher than those of standard CNI- or sirolimus-based regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Belatacept provides a new option for maintenance immunosuppression in adult KTR. Further research is needed to compare its efficacy and safety with standard tacrolimus-based regimens, to evaluate whether increased drug costs are offset by long-term improvements in patient and allograft survival, and to establish its role in the immunosuppression armamentarium.

A multicenter experience with generic tacrolimus conversion.

BACKGROUND: The first generic tacrolimus product gained Food and Drug Administration approval in August 2009. This prospective, observational trial sought to determine the need for dose titrations and measure drug cost savings on conversion to generic tacrolimus. METHODS: Transplant recipients on stable tacrolimus doses were converted from brand to generic tacrolimus on a mg:mg basis. Data were collected at the time of generic conversion (study arm) and at a time point exactly 6 months before conversion (control arm) for all subjects. RESULTS: Seventy conversions from four centers are reported. Subjects were a mean of 70 months after kidney (n=37), liver (n=28), or multiorgan (n=5) transplant. In the study arm, mean tacrolimus doses were 4.4 and 4.5 mg/d and mean tacrolimus trough concentrations were 5.8 and 5.9 ng/mL before and after conversion, respectively. In the control arm, mean tacrolimus doses were 4.6 and 4.6 mg/d and mean tacrolimus trough concentrations were 6.1 and 5.9 ng/mL before and after the control time point, respectively. Dose titrations occurred in five patients (7%) in the control arm and 15 patients (21%) in the study arm (P=0.028). Mean monthly drug costs were $645 for brand, $593 for generic, and $595 for generic after dose titrations. Mean monthly patient copays were $38 for brand and $15 for generic. CONCLUSIONS: These cumulative data show that dose requirements and trough levels are similar between brand and generic tacrolimus and that generic substitution allows for savings. However, postconversion monitoring is prudent as patients may require dose titration.

Outcomes with conversion from calcineurin inhibitors to sirolimus after renal transplantation in the context of steroid withdrawal or steroid continuation.

BACKGROUND: A number of studies have suggested that conversion from calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) to sirolimus (SRL) can improve graft function in renal transplant patients. None of these studies has converted patients to SRL in the absence of steroids. METHODS: We describe our experience with 278 renal transplants of which 153 were converted from CNI to SRL. The majority of patients had steroids withdrawn after 6 days. Almost all patients received antithymocyte globulin induction and were maintained on mycophenolate mofetil. RESULTS: Six months after conversion, patients remaining on SRL therapy had a mean increase in estimated glomerular filtration rate of 6.93 mL/min/1.73 m2 (P<0.0001) compared with preconversion values. SRL-converted patients analyzed by intention-to-treat increased estimated glomerular filtration rate by 5.00 mL/min/1.73 m2 (P=0.0005). Eighty-one percent of patients remaining on SRL had a successful conversion, defined as stable or improved renal function at 6 months. The only factor predictive of unsuccessful conversion was urine protein-to-creatinine ratio more than 1. The benefits of SRL conversion were seen in patients at high immunological risk as well as those at lower risk. Proteinuria increased by a mean of 0.1 (P=0.43) at 6 months. Thirty-six percent of SRL-converted patients experienced adverse effects requiring conversion back to CNI. Rates of rejection, graft loss, and patient death with SRL conversion were low. CONCLUSIONS: The results from our clinical practice suggest that even in the absence of steroids, SRL conversion significantly improves renal function, with acceptable rates of adverse events.

Timing of sirolimus conversion influences recovery of renal function in liver transplant recipients.

The long-term use of calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) leads to renal dysfunction in many liver transplant (LT) recipients. The purpose of this analysis is to evaluate renal function in patients converted from CNI to sirolimus (SRL). From May 2002-November 2006, 137 LT were performed in 125 patients, 72 of which were converted to SRL. Evaluation of SRL conversion was stratified by early conversion (<90 d from LT) (EC) vs. late conversion (LC). Renal function was evaluated using the six-point modification of diet in renal disease formula (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR]). Forty-two patients on SRL and 40 on CNI had at least three months of follow-up and are included in the eGFR evaluation. At all time points after conversion, the EC group demonstrated a significantly higher mean eGFR than those in the LC group. A significant improvement in eGFR was seen within the EC group when comparing eGFR at time of conversion to eGFR at three, six, nine, and 12 months after conversion and last follow-up. The only improvement in the LC group was from conversion to the three-month time point. We conclude that EC to SRL results in a profound improvement in eGFR that begins at three months and is sustained beyond one yr.

Pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid, tacrolimus and sirolimus after gastric bypass surgery in end-stage renal disease and transplant patients: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Promising data regarding the safety and efficacy of gastric bypass surgery (GBS) as an option to address obesity in the transplant population are emerging. The data lack on how GBS may alter the pharmacokinetics (PK) of modern immunosuppression. The objective of this study was to describe the alterations in the PK of modern immunosuppressants and the GBS population. METHODS: Data are presented on six subjects who participated in this trial--four were on dialysis and two were renal transplant recipients. Dialysis-dependent bypass subjects received a single dose of 6 mg of sirolimus, two 4-mg doses of tacrolimus and two 1000-mg doses of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) over the 24-h study period. Transplant recipients continued their current regimen. Maximum plasma concentration (C(max)), time to reach the maximum plasma concentration (T(max)) and the area under the plasma concentration vs. time curve (AUC(0-12) and AUC(0-infinity) where appropriate) were calculated for tacrolimus, sirolimus, mycophenolic acid (MPA) and mycophenolic acid glucuronide (MPAG). RESULTS: Significant inter-patient variability in the C(max), T(max) and AUC of tacrolimus, sirolimus MPA and MPAG was observed. A notable difference in the AUC:dose ratio for tacrolimus was seen when comparing data with published data in the non-bypass population. Similar differences in PK were seen with sirolimus, MPA and MPAG. CONCLUSIONS: When comparing the PK of sirolimus, tacrolimus, MPA and MPAG to published PK data in the non-bypass population, significant differences are observed. It is likely that transplant recipients with GBS would need higher doses of tacrolimus, sirolimus and MMF to provide similar exposure to a non-bypass patient.

Body weight alterations under early corticosteroid withdrawal and chronic corticosteroid therapy with modern immunosuppression.

BACKGROUND: Weight gain is a known complication of corticosteroid maintenance therapy. The purpose of the present study was to compare patterns of weight gain under chronic corticosteroid therapy (CCST) with that observed under early (i.e., within 7 days posttransplant) corticosteroid withdrawal (CSWD) in renal-transplant recipients. METHODS: Renal-transplant recipients who underwent early CSWD under four prospective, institutional review board-approved clinical trials were compared with a historic control group of patients receiving maintenance CCST. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-nine patients with early CSWD were compared with 132 patients who received CCST. Mean population weight gain was significantly higher in CCST patients at 3, 6, and 12 months posttransplant. Race influenced weight gain because white CSWD patients demonstrated greater reductions in weight gain compared with African-American patients. Sex also influenced weight gain: women demonstrated a greater benefit from CSWD than did men. Corticosteroid rejection therapy in CSWD patients completely restored weight gain because these patients showed weight gains similar to the CCST group. Finally, pretransplant body mass index (BMI) also influenced weight gain because patients who were overweight (BMI 25-30) or obese (BMI>30) demonstrated a greater reduction in weight gain with CSWD than did patients of normal weight (BMI<25). CONCLUSIONS: Early CSWD minimizes weight gain in renal-transplant recipients. Women, whites, and patients with high pretransplant BMI had greater reductions in weight gain with early CSWD.

Potential elevation of tacrolimus trough concentrations with concomitant metronidazole therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To report the occurrence of a potential tacrolimus elevation in a renal transplant recipient after adding metronidazole to the medication regimen. CASE SUMMARY: A 24-year-old white man status post living-related renal transplant who had been stabilized on tacrolimus 4 mg twice daily (trough concentrations 7-10 ng/mL) for 2 months and prednisone 20 mg daily presented to the clinic with severe diarrhea. Stool cultures were positive for Clostridium difficile, and therapy with metronidazole 500 mg 4 times daily was initiated. Between days 4 and 14 of metronidazole therapy, the patient's tacrolimus trough concentration and serum creatinine level increased to maximum levels of 26.3 ng/mL and 3.3 mg/dL (baseline 1.6-1.8 mg/dL), respectively. Tacrolimus was withheld for one dose and then decreased to 1 mg twice daily. Two days after metronidazole discontinuation, tacrolimus trough concentrations dropped to 9.4 ng/mL and serum creatinine to 2.3 mg/dL, warranting a tacrolimus dose increase to 3 mg daily. DISCUSSION: As of April 15, 2005, one other case has been reported documenting an elevation in tacrolimus concentrations with the addition of metronidazole. The possible mechanism may be related to metronidazole's weak inhibition of CYP3A4 and, possibly, P-glycoprotein. According to the Naranjo probability scale, metronidazole was the probable cause of this adverse reaction. CONCLUSIONS: Coadministration of tacrolimus with metronidazole may result in elevated tacrolimus concentrations, possibly leading to tacrolimus toxicity. Practitioners should be aware of this potential interaction and closely monitor tacrolimus concentrations and renal function.

African-American renal transplant recipients benefit from early corticosteroid withdrawal under modern immunosuppression.

African-Americans (AAs) have historically been considered high-risk renal transplant recipients due to increased rejection rates and reduced long-term graft survival. As a result, AAs are often excluded from corticosteroid withdrawal (CSWD) protocols. Modern immunosuppression has reduced rejections and improved graft survival in AAs and may allow successful CSWD. Outcomes in 56 AAs were compared to 56 non-AAs. All patients were enrolled in one of four early CSWD protocols. Results are reported as AA versus non-AA. Acute rejection at 1-year was 23% and 18%; (p = NS); creatinine clearance at 1-year was 75 versus 80 mL/min (p = NS); patient and graft survival was 96% versus 98% and 91% versus 91%; (p = NS). AAs benefit from early CSWD with significantly improved blood pressure, LDL < 130 mg/dL and HDL > 45 mg/dL at 1-year, post-transplant diabetes of 8.7%, and mean weight change at 1-year of 4.8 +/- 7.2 kg. In conclusion, early CSWD in AAs is associated with acceptable rejection rates, excellent patient and graft survival, and improved cardiovascular risk, indicating that the risks and benefits of early CSWD are similar between AAs and non-AAs. Additional follow-up is needed to determine long-term renal function, graft survival, and cardiovascular risk in AAs with early CSWD.

West Nile virus encephalitis in organ transplant recipients: another high-risk group for meningoencephalitis and death.

West Nile virus infection has been spreading westward across the continental United States since 1999. Although it often presents as a mild, self-limiting viral illness, it can result in a devastating meningoencephalitis in some patient populations, particularly the elderly. We report in this article on two immunosuppressed transplant patients who developed a severe meningoencephalitis caused by mosquito-borne West Nile virus infection. Suggestions for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of West Nile virus infection in this patient population are described.