Ventricular Arrhythmia Burden in Patients With Heart Failure and Cardiac Resynchronization Devices: The Importance of Renal Function.

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a risk factor for arrhythmias in patients with heart failure (HF). However, the effects of CKD on ventricular arrhythmia (VA) burden in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy and defibrillator (CRT-D) devices in a primary prevention setting are unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether baseline CKD is associated with increased risk of VA in patients implanted with primary prevention CRT-D devices. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this retrospective study, 199 consecutive primary prevention CRT-D recipients (2005-2010) were stratified by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) levels prior to device implantation with 106 (53.2%) ≥CKD III (eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 ) (CKD group). CKD group patients were significantly older (70.0 ± 10 years vs. 61.3 ± 12 years, P < 0.05) with higher prevalence of ischemic cardiomyopathy (56.2% vs. 40.2%, P < 0.05). Detected ventricular tachycardia (VT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF) episodes resulting in device therapy occurred significantly more frequently in the CKD group [40/106(37.8%)] than controls [24/93(25.8%)], (odd ratio [OR] = 1.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.01-3.2, P = 0.05). At 5-year follow-up, interval censored data analysis showed 41% VT/VF incidence in the CKD group compared to 24% incidence in controls (P < 0.05). Cox proportional hazards model identified CKD > III as the only predictor of sustained VA in this group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 2.92, CI = 1.39-6.1, P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Baseline CKD is a strong independent risk factor for VA in primary prevention CRT-D recipients. Further understanding of the underlying arrhythmogenic mechanisms relating to CKD may be of interest to allow appropriate correction and prevention. Device programming in this cohort may need to reflect this increased risk.

Is CRT pro-arrhythmic? A comparative analysis of the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias between patients implanted with CRTs and ICDs.

UNLABELLED: Aim and Hypothesis: Despite the proven symptomatic and mortality benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), there is anecdotal evidence it may be pro-arrhythmic in some patients. We aimed to identify if there were significant differences in the incidence of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) in patients undergoing CRT-D and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) implantation for primary prevention indication. We hypothesized that CRT is unlikely to be pro-arrhythmic based on the positive mortality and morbidity data from large randomized trials. METHODS AND RESULTS: A retrospective analysis of device therapies for VA in a primary prevention device cohort was performed. Patients with ischemic (IHD) and non-ischemic (DCM) cardiomyopathy and ICD or CRT+ICD devices (CRT-D) implanted between 2005 and 2007 without prior history of sustained VA were included for analysis. VA episodes were identified from stored electrograms and defined as sustained (VT/VF) if therapy [anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) or shocks] was delivered or non-sustained (NSVT) if not. Of a total of 180 patients, 117 (68% male) were in the CRT-D group, 42% IHD, ejection fraction (EF) 24.5 ± 8.2% and mean follow-up 23.9 ± 9.8 months. 63 patients (84% male) were in the ICD group, 60% IHD, EF 27.7 ± 7.2% and mean follow-up 24.6 ± 10.8 months. Overall, there was no significant difference in the incidence of VA (35.0 vs. 38.1%, p = 0.74), sustained VT (21.3 vs. 28.5%, p = 0.36) or NSVT (12.8 vs. 9.5%, p = 0.63) and no significant difference in type of therapy received for VT/VF: ATP (68 vs. 66.6%, p = 0.73) and shocks (32 vs. 33.3%, p = 0.71) between the CRT-D and ICD groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: In patients with cardiomyopathy receiving CRT-D and ICDs for primary prophylaxis, there was no significant difference in the incidence of VA. From this single center retrospective analysis, there is no evidence to support cardiac resynchronization causing pro-arrhythmia.

A simple infection-control protocol to reduce serious cardiac device infections.

AIM: Device infection is a serious complication and is considered procedure-related if occurring within 12 months of an intervention. We analysed the effectiveness of a simple infection-control protocol (ICP) at reducing cardiac device infections (CDIs) in a tertiary referral centre. METHODS AND RESULTS: Prior to the introduction of a new ICP, we retrospectively analysed all simple and complex device implants, related procedures, and infections over a 3-year period. A new protocol was implemented from November 2007, including antibiotic prophylaxis determined by risk stratification, improved glycaemic control, specific skin preparation, and closure techniques, as well as different diathermy settings. Follow-up data for all patients were collected. Risk factors for infection were compared between pre- and post-intervention groups to ensure that the populations were comparable. A cost analysis of CDI and a review of the commonly identified micro-organisms were also undertaken. One thousand seven hundred and ninety-eight procedures were performed between November 2004 and November 2007 and 981 procedures between November 2007 and May 2009. There were no significant differences in the risk factors for infection between the two groups. Following the introduction of the ICP, there was a 54% reduction in the incidence of CDI from 1.3 to 0.6% (P < 0.03; CI 0.25, 1.36). Most patients with CDI had negative blood cultures or grew Staphylococcus sp. The average cost was £30 958.40 per infection incident and the cost of the new ICP was minimal. CONCLUSIONS: A significant reduction in CDI can be achieved with the introduction of a simple ICP with substantial cost savings.

An 8-year single-centre experience of cardiac resynchronisation therapy: procedural success, early and late complications, and left ventricular lead performance.

AIMS: Despite the increasing number of device implants worldwide, little is known about the early and late complications of cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) or the incidence of these complications in patients with different heart failure aetiologies. We aim to determine procedural success and early and late complications in CRT patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: All early (<90 days) and late (>90 days) complications occurring over 490 consecutive CRT procedures in 402 patients, from a large single-centre registry between 2000 and 2009 were analysed. Mean follow-up duration was 1012 ± 610 days. In addition, procedural data and long-term left ventricular (LV) lead performance were examined. The mean age of patients was 65 ± 15 years, 31% were female. The majority of devices (70%) were CRT-defibrillators. Left ventricular lead implantation was achieved after one or more than one attempt in 96.7% of patients (first procedure was successful in 95.1%). The incidence of early and late complications was 9.4% and 6.1% respectively. Infection and lead displacement were the most common complications. Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) was associated with significantly more complications than ischaemic cardiomyopathy (P = 0.01) and these occurred later in the DCM population. Long-term LV lead performance was comparable with that of right atrial and ventricular leads. CONCLUSION: Transvenous implantation of the LV lead is safe and achievable for CRT with high procedural success rates. For the first time we describe the late complications from CRT in different heart failure populations. This group of patients must be kept under surveillance, not only for heart failure events but also for device-related issues. The reasons for higher complication rates in DCM patients require further evaluation.

A randomized double-blind crossover trial of triventricular versus biventricular pacing in heart failure.

AIMS: A significant proportion of patients implanted with biventricular (BiV) devices fail to respond. Clinical response may be improved by additional ventricular stimulation sites. This single-centre, double-blinded randomized crossover trial aimed to determine whether long-term multisite ventricular pacing is superior to conventional BiV pacing in heart failure patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 43 patients referred for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) underwent transvenous implantation of a triventricular (TriV) device. Pacing leads were positioned in the right ventricular (RV) apex and a lateral coronary sinus (CS) branch, with a third ventricular lead implanted in a further lateral CS branch in 23 patients (group A) and on the high RV septum in 20 patients (group B). Devices were programmed in a randomized order to four pre-determined pacing configurations: conventional BiV, TriV, and dual-site and single-site left bentricular (LV) or RV pacing for 3-month periods with clinical and echo assessment at the end of each period. The primary endpoint was the comparison of 6 min walk distance (6MW) after 3 months of BiV vs. TriV pacing; secondary endpoints were Minnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLWHF) scores, and LV dimensions and function. The 12-month follow-up period was completed by 37 patients. Compared with BiV pacing, TriV pacing resulted in significant improvements in 6MW (451 ± 112 m vs. 425 ± 119 m, P = 0.008), MLWHF (32 ± 19 vs. 38 ± 24, P = 0.036), LV end-systolic volume (158 ± 79mL vs. 168 ± 76 mL, P < 0.05), and ejection fraction (30 ± 8% vs. 27 ± 8%, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: TriV pacing was associated with significant improvements in clinical and echocardiographic parameters compared with BiV pacing.

Improving safety in the electrophysiology laboratory using a simple radiation dose reduction strategy: a study of 1007 radiofrequency ablation procedures.

BACKGROUND: The use of fluoroscopic screening involves exposure to ionising radiation for both patients and operators. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of radiation dose reduction manoeuvres (DRM) during radiofrequency ablation (RFA) procedures. DESIGN: Prospective study of DRM. SETTING: Tertiary cardiac centre. Interventions Two DRM were combined: removal of the secondary radiation grid and programming an ultra-low pulsed fluoroscopy rate. These methods were assessed using an anthropomorphic phantom model to measure skin entrance dose rates. Procedures were classified as complex (ablation of atrial fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia or complex congenital heart disease arrhythmias) or simple (all other RFA). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Dose area product and screening times were compared for ablations performed before and after DRM. Equivalent doses to organs and malignancy risk were determined by computer modelling. RESULTS: Over a 39-month period, 1007 ablation procedures were performed (631 simple, 376 complex). Radiation dose was significantly reduced after DRM for both simple (20.4±26.9 Gycm(2) vs 8.0±10.3 Gycm(2), p<0.00001) and complex ablations (63.3±50.1 Gycm(2) vs 32.8±31.7 Gycm(2), p<0.00001) with no difference in screening times. The mean lifetime risk of fatal cancer attributable to radiation exposure per million procedures was reduced from 182 to 68 for simple ablations and from 440 to 155 for complex ablations. CONCLUSIONS: Significant reductions in radiation exposure during RFA were achieved using simple DRM, corresponding to a two-thirds reduction of the risk of excess fatal malignancy.

Biventricular device implantation in a patient with congenitally corrected transposition and left-sided superior vena cava.

An increasing number of patients with congenital heart disease are surviving into adulthood and some have indications for device therapy. Complex anatomical abnormalities may hinder the operator and require the adaptation of standard implantation techniques. We present the first report of successful biventricular ICD implantation in a patient with mesocardia, congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries, pulmonary atresia, and a left superior vena cava draining into the coronary sinus. This case posed challenges in lead placement due to both complex anatomy and the risk of inappropriate device therapies secondary to far-field oversensing.

Effect of biventricular pacing on symptoms and cardiac remodelling in patients with end-stage hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Biventricular (BiV) pacing is an established therapy for heart failure in ischaemic and dilated cardiomyopathy. Its effects in end-stage hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) are unknown. AIMS: To assess the potential benefits of BiV pacing in patients with symptomatic end-stage HCM. METHODS: Twenty patients with non-obstructive HCM (12 male, mean age 57+/-13 years), left bundle branch block and symptoms of heart failure refractory to medical therapy underwent implantation of a BiV device. NYHA class, echocardiographic parameters and exercise capacity were assessed before and after implantation. RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 13+/-6 months, an improvement of at least one NYHA class was reported in 8 (40%) patients. A clinical response was associated with an increase in ejection fraction (from 41+/-14% to 50+/-12%, p=0.009), and reductions in left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (from 57+/-6 mm to 52+/-7 mm, p=0.031) and left atrial diameter (from 65+/-8 mm to 57+/-6 mm, p=0.005). Percentage predicted peak oxygen consumption was unchanged in responders but significantly declined in non-responders (p=0.029). CONCLUSIONS: BiV pacing improved heart failure symptoms in a significant proportion of patients with end-stage HCM. Symptomatic improvement was associated with reverse remodelling of the left atrium and ventricle.

Successful coronary sinus lead replacement despite total venous occlusion using femoral pull through, two operator counter-traction and subclavian venoplasty.

The majority of patients presenting for lead extraction have indications for a replacement lead. Venous stenosis is common in recipients of pacing leads and can impede ipsilateral lead replacement. Recanalization through an existing tract after lead extraction allows successful lead placement but may require complex hybrid lead extraction and revascularization techniques. We present a case in which a combination of femoral lead extraction with complete guidewire pull-through, two operator external counter-traction and subclavian venoplasty was used to successfully replace a coronary sinus lead in a patient with total subclavian venous occlusion.

Right atrial angiography facilitates transseptal puncture for complex ablation in patients with unusual anatomy.

OBJECTIVE: The number of transseptal punctures performed worldwide has increased exponentially with the development of ablation therapies for atrial arrhythmias. Safe access into the left atrium in these procedures is often complicated by abnormal anatomy. We assessed the potential of right atrial angiography to facilitate transseptal puncture for atrial ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined all transseptal punctures performed for complex left atrial ablation in our centre over a 29-month period. In cases where conventional transseptal techniques failed, we performed orthogonal right atrial angiography to define cardiac anatomy and orientation. During the study period, 255 transseptal procedures were performed. Of these, 16 cases were complicated by distorted atrial anatomy, extreme cardiac rotation or unexpected location of the atria in relation to the diaphragm, preventing left atrial access using conventional fluoroscopy. The application of right atrial angiography facilitated successful transseptal puncture in all patients when use of conventional mapping catheters and fluoroscopy proved unhelpful. There were no complications relating to right atrial angiography. CONCLUSION: These cases highlight a number of difficulties encountered when performing transseptal punctures. Previously reported adjunctive techniques require specialised equipment, general anaesthesia or multiple catheters that may be unavailable or impede the procedure. Right atrial angiography is a simple and safe adjunct to conventional techniques to facilitate complex transseptal procedures.