Computer aided characterization of the solitary pulmonary nodule using volumetric and contrast enhancement features.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To investigate the utility of a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) in the task of differentiating malignant nodules from benign nodules based on quantitative features extracted from volumetric thin section CT image data acquired before and after the injection of contrast media. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 35 volumetric CT datasets of solitary pulmonary nodules (SPN) with proven diagnoses (19 malignant/16 benign) were contoured by a thoracic radiologist. All studies had at least a baseline series obtained without contrast media and at least one series following an intravenous contrast injection at 45, 90, 180, and 360 seconds. Two separate contours were created for each nodule: one including only the solid portion and another including the ground-glass component, if any, of the nodule. For each contour 31 features were calculated that measured the attenuation, shape, and enhancement of the nodule due to the injection of contrast. These features were input into a feature selection step and three different classifiers to determine if the diagnosis could be predicted from the resulting feature vector. In addition, observer input was introduced to two of the classifiers as an a priori probability of malignancy and the resulting performance was compared. Training and testing was conducted in a resubstitution and leave-one-out fashion and performance was evaluated using ROC analysis. RESULTS: In a leave-one-out testing methodology, the classifiers achieved areas under the ROC curves AZ that ranged from 0.69 to 0.92. A classifier based on logistic regression performed the best with an AZ of 0.92 while a classifier based on quadratic discriminant analysis performed the poorest (AZ, 0.69). The AZ increased when using a priori observer input in most cases reaching a maximum of 0.95. CONCLUSION: Based on this initial work with a limited number of nodules in our dataset, it appears that CAD using volumetric and contrast-enhanced data has the potential to assist radiologists in the task of differentiating solitary pulmonary nodules and in the management of these patients. Further studies with an increased number of patients are required to validate these results.

Computer-aided diagnosis of the solitary pulmonary nodule.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: We sought to investigate the utility of a computer-aided diagnosis in the task of differentiating malignant nodules from benign nodules based on single thin-section computed tomography image data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-one thin-section computed tomography data sets of solitary pulmonary nodules with proven diagnoses (48 malignant and 33 benign) were contoured manually on a single representative slice by a thoracic radiologist (>10 years of experience). Two separate contours were created for each nodule, one including only the solid portion of the nodule and one including any ground-glass components. For each contour 75 features were calculated that measured the attenuation, shape, and texture of the nodule. These features were than input into a feature selection step and four different classifiers to determine if the diagnosis could be predicted from the feature vector. Training and testing was conducted in a resubstitution and leave-one-out fashion and performance was evaluated using ROC techniques. RESULTS: In a leave-one-out testing methodology the classifiers resulted with areas under the ROC curve (A(Z)) that ranged from 0.68 to 0.92. When evaluating with resubstitution the A(Z) ranged from 0.93 to 1.00. CONCLUSION: Computer-aided diagnosis has the potential to assist radiologists in the task of differentiating solitary pulmonary nodules and in the management of these patients.

Comparison of treatment response classifications between unidimensional, bidimensional, and volumetric measurements of metastatic lung lesions on chest computed tomography.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To study the agreement in treatment response classifications between unidimensional (1D), bidimensional (2D), and volumetric (3D) methods of measuring metastatic lung nodules on chest computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Chest CT scans of 15 patients undergoing treatment for metastatic colorectal, renal cell, or breast carcinoma to the lungs were analyzed. CT images were acquired with 3 mm collimation and contiguous reconstruction. Two or three lung lesions were selected for each patient. Lesions were analyzed at baseline and two follow-up intervals of 1-4 months. 1D and 2D measurements were made with electronic calipers, while nodule volume was measured using a semiautomated segmentation system. Following the World Health Organization and RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) criteria, patients were categorized into four treatment response classifications. Volumetric criteria were used to classify response based on 3D measurements. RESULTS: Thirty-two lesions from 15 patients were analyzed. Because each patient had a baseline and two follow-up scans, this yielded 30 response classifications for each measurement technique. The 1D, 2D, and 3D measurements were concordant in 21 of 30 classifications. The 1D and 3D measurements were concordant in 29 of 30 classifications, while the 2D and 3D measurements were concordant in 23 of 30 classifications. Level of agreement among the three methods was measured using a kappa statistic (K). For 1D compared with 3D, K = 0.739 +/- 0.345 (visits 1, 2) and 0.273 +/- 0.323 (visits 2, 3). For 2D compared with 3D, K = 0.655 +/- 0.325 (visits 1, 2) and 0.200 +/- 0.208 (visits 2, 3). Agreement among the methods for round and ovoid nodules was also fair to poor. CONCLUSION: The three methods of tumor measurement show fair to poor agreement in treatment response classification. These findings have negative implications for the accuracy in which patients are classified under the World Health Organization or RECIST criteria and managed under cancer treatment protocols.

Emphysema: effect of reconstruction algorithm on CT imaging measures.

In the current study, the effects of reconstruction algorithms on quantitative measures derived from computed tomographic (CT) lung images were assessed in patients with emphysema. CT image data sets were reconstructed with a standard algorithm and alternative algorithm(s) for 42 subjects. Algorithms were grouped as overenhancing, sharp, standard, or smooth. Density mask and volume measurements from the alternative algorithm data sets were compared with standard algorithm data sets. The overenhancing category yielded an average shift of 9.4% (ie, a shift in average score from 35.5% to 44.9%); the sharp category, a shift of 2.4%; and the smooth category, a shift of -1.0%. Differences in total lung volume measurements were less than 1%. In conclusion, the CT reconstruction algorithm may strongly affect density mask results, especially for certain reconstruction algorithms.