Impact of an online reference system on the diagnosis of rare or atypical abdominal tumors and lesions.

The purpose of the present study is to evaluate whether an online reference system (ORS, STATdx Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands) impacts finding the histologically confirmed diagnosis of rare or atypical abdominal tumors and lesions in radiologic imaging. In total, 101 patients with rare tumor entities or lesions and atypical manifestations of common tumors were enrolled retrospectively. Blinded readings were performed by four radiologists with varying levels of experience, who reported on: (a) correct diagnosis (CD), (b) time needed to find the diagnosis, and (c) diagnostic confidence, initially without followed by the assistance of the ORS. The experienced reader (3 years of experience post-residency, CD 49.5%), as well as the advanced reader with 1 year of experience post-residency (CD 43.6%), and a resident with 5 years of experience (CD 46.5%) made the correct diagnosis more frequently compared to the less experienced reader (CD 25.7%). A significant improvement in making the correct diagnosis was only achieved by the advanced reader, the resident with 5 years of experience (CD with ORS 58.4%; p < 0.001). The advanced reader with 1 year of experience post-residency improved slightly (CD ORS 47.5%). The experienced reader (CD ORS 50.5%) and the less experienced reader (CD ORS 27.7%) did not improve significantly. The overall subjective confidence increased significantly when ORS was used (3.2 ± 0.9 vs. 3.8 ± 0.9; p < 0.001). While the ORS had a positive impact on making the correct diagnosis throughout all readers, it favored radiologists with more clinical experience rather than inexperienced residents. Moreover, the ORS increased the diagnostic confidence of all radiologists significantly. In conclusion, the ORS had no significant impact on the diagnosis of rare or atypical abdominal tumors and lesions except for one reader. The greatest benefit is the increase in diagnostic confidence.

Pancreatic cancer in photon-counting CT: Low keV virtual monoenergetic images improve tumor conspicuity.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The aim of the study was to identify differences in the tumor conspicuity of pancreatic adenocarcinomas in different monoenergetic or polyenergetic reconstructions and contrast phases in photon-counting CT (PCCT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: 34 patients were retrospectively enrolled in this study. Quantitative image analysis was performed with region of interest (ROI) measurements in different monoenergetic levels ranging from 40 up to 70 keV (5-point steps) and polyenergetic series. Tumor-parenchyma attenuation differences and contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR) were calculated. A qualitative image analysis was accomplished by 4 radiologists using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = "not recognizable" up to 5 = "easy recognizable"). Differences between groups were evaluated for statistical significance using the Friedman test and in case of significant differences pair-wise post-hoc testing with Bonferroni correction was applied. RESULTS: Tumor-parenchyma attenuation difference was significantly different between the different image reconstructions for both arterial- and portal-venous-phase-images (p < 0.001). Tumor-parenchyma attenuation difference was significantly higher on arterial-phase-images at mono40keV compared to polyenergetic images (p < 0.001) and mono55keV images or higher (p < 0.001). For portal-venous-phase-images tumor-parenchyma attenuation difference was significantly higher on mono40keV images compared to polyenergetic images (p < 0.001) and mono50keV images (p = 0.03) or higher (p < 0.001). The same trend was seen for CNR. Tumor conspicuity was rated best on mono40keV images with 4.3 ± 0.9 for arterial-phase-images and 4.3 ± 1.1 for portal-venous-phase-images. In contrast, overall image quality was rated best on polyenergetic-images with 4.8 ± 0.5 for arterial-phase-images and 4.7 ± 0.6 for portal-venous-phase-images. CONCLUSION: Low keV virtual monoenergetic images significantly improve the tumor conspicuity of pancreatic adenocarcinomas in PCCT based on quantitative and qualitative results. On the other hand, readers prefer polyenergetic images for overall image quality.