Heart rate monitoring on the stroke unit. What does heart beat tell about prognosis? An observational study.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend maintaining the heart rate (HR) of acute stroke patients within physiological limits; data on the frequency and predictors of significant deviations from these limits are scarce. METHODS: Demographical data, stroke risk factors, NIH stroke scale score, lesion size and location, and ECG parameters were prospectively assessed in 256 patients with ischemic stroke. Patients were continuously monitored for at least 24 hours on a certified stroke unit. Tachycardia (HR ≥ 120 bpm) and bradycardia (HR <45 bpm) and cardiac rhythm (sinus rhythm or atrial fibrillation) were documented. We investigated the influence of risk factors on HR disturbances and their respective influence on dependence (modified Rankin Scale ≥ 3 after three months) and mortality. RESULTS: HR ≥ 120 bpm occurred in 39 patients (15%). Stroke severity (larger lesion size/higher NIHSS-score on admission), atrial fibrillation and HR on admission predicted its occurrence. HR <45 bpm occurred in 12 patients (5%) and was predicted by lower HR on admission. Neither HR ≥ 120 nor HR <45 bpm independently predicted poor outcome at three moths. Stroke location had no effect on the occurrence of HR violations. Clinical severity and age remained the only consistent predictors of poor outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Significant tachycardia and bradycardia are frequent phenomena in acute stroke; however they do not independently predict clinical course or outcome. Continuous monitoring allows detecting rhythm disturbances in stroke patients and allows deciding whether urgent medical treatment is necessary.

Prolongation of small bowel allograft survival with a sequential therapy consisting of a synthetic MHC class II peptide and temporarily low-dose cyclosporine A.

It has been extensively documented the role of the indirect pathway of allorecognition in allograft rejection. However, recent data demonstrate that the manipulation of this pathway could be also sufficient to promote prolongation of allograft survival. In the present study we evaluated the effect of preoperative immunization with the WF-specific MHC class II peptides RT1.D2 and RT1.B2 in combination with low-dose CsA from days 0 to 7 (5 mg/kg/day) and from days 8 to 30 (1 mg/kg/day) after WF small bowel transplantation. Seven days before and on the day of transplantation, LEW recipients were immunized with the two WF MHC class II peptides RT1.B2 and RT1.D2. The CsA monotherapy induced an allograft survival of 49.3 +/- 6.1 days. MHC class II peptide immunization had a limited effect on allograft survival for RT1.D2 (47.1 +/- 3.8 days) and induced prolongation of allograft survival for RT1.B2 (73.6 +/- 34.6 days). This effect seems to be based on the absence or silence of RT1.B2-reactive T cells and rejection seems to be correlated with the presence of RT1.B2-specific T cells in the late phase. Therefore, the combination of RT1.B2 with low-dose CsA shifts the immunological response and protects small bowel allograft rejection.