Fluoroscopic Evaluation of Duodenal Diseases.

The duodenum can be affected by a variety of abnormalities because of its development during embryogenesis and its dual intra- and retroperitoneal location. If small bowel embryogenesis is disturbed, congenital errors occur. Although some congenital variants may be asymptomatic and inconsequential to the patient, other anomalies can result in life-threatening emergencies such as malrotation, leading to midgut volvulus. Many infectious processes affect the duodenum, including duodenal ulcers and opportunistic infection in patients with HIV/AIDS or Crohn disease. Small bowel malignancies are uncommon but important to recognize, because the duodenum can be involved in polyposis syndromes or the development of primary adenocarcinoma, neuroendocrine tumors, lymphoma, and metastasis. Although endoscopy is currently the most used diagnostic method to assess the lumen of the upper gastrointestinal tract, fluoroscopy is a valuable adjunct technique and the study of choice for many diseases, specifically those for which anatomic and functional information is required. Fluoroscopy is also commonly used postoperatively to assess for complications such as obstruction and extraluminal leaks. Compared with endoscopy, fluoroscopy is an inexpensive and noninvasive technique that provides salient anatomic information and allows delineation of the duodenal mucosa and assessment of real-time duodenal motility. The authors examine the broad spectrum of conditions that can involve the duodenum, including congenital, infectious, inflammatory, and neoplastic abnormalities, and review their typical appearances at fluoroscopy. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2022.

Evolution of bariatric surgery: a historical perspective.

OBJECTIVE: Older legacy bariatric surgical procedures, including jejunocolic bypass, jejunoileal bypass, vertical banded gastroplasty, and biliopancreatic diversion, are no longer performed. Biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch is still performed in select centers. Although the legacy procedures are no longer performed, there are still patients who have undergone these surgeries in the past who are currently either under continuous surveillance or are being evaluated for surgical conversion or revision because of complications or weight regain. The purpose of this article is to describe the evolutionary development of various bariatric surgical techniques and the associated surgical anatomy. Because these procedures are no longer performed, only limited imaging of legacy bariatric surgeries is available for radiologic demonstration. CONCLUSION: Although earlier bariatric surgical techniques are no longer favored, there are still patients who underwent these procedures who require imaging evaluation for clinical follow-up or surgical revision. Understanding the radiologic-surgical anatomy of these older bariatric procedures can help in the prompt and appropriate management of these patients.

Imaging pediatric magnet ingestion with surgical-pathological correlation.

Foreign body ingestion is a common problem in the pediatric population and a frequent cause for emergency room visits. Magnets are common household objects that when ingested can bring about severe, possibly fatal gastrointestinal complications. Radiography is an integral component of the management of these children. Pediatric and emergency radiologists alike must be aware of imaging manifestations of magnet ingestion, as their identification drives decision-making for consulting surgeons and gastroenterologists. Radiology can thus substantially augment the clinical history and physical exam, facilitating appropriate management. This manuscript sequentially presents cases of magnet ingestion featuring imaging findings coupled with surgical and pathological correlation. Each case is presented to highlight ways in which the radiologist can make impactful contributions to diagnosis and management. Clinical overview with pitfalls of magnet ingestion imaging and an imaging decision tree will also be presented.

Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: defining long-term clinical and anatomic outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: We recently reported in a multi-institutional, randomized study of laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair (LPEHR) that the anatomic recurrence rate at a median of approximately 5 years was >50%. This study focuses exclusively on the symptomatic response to LPEHR and its relationship with the development of a recurrent hernia. METHODS: During 2002 to 2005, 108 patients underwent LPHER with or without biologic mesh. A standardized symptom severity questionnaire, SF-36 health survey, and upper gastrointestinal series were performed at baseline, 6 months, and during 2008-2009. RESULTS: Of 108 patients, 72 (average age of 68 ± 10 years) underwent clinical assessment, and 60 of them also had radiologic studies at a median follow-up of 58 (40-78) months. Radiographic recurrence (≥ 20 mm) was 14% at 6 months and 57% at the time of follow-up, and the average recurrence size was 40 ± 10 mm. All symptoms were significantly improved at long-term follow-up and, with the exception of heartburn, were unaffected by the presence or size of the recurrence. Two patients (3%) with recurrent symptoms related to their hernia underwent reoperation. CONCLUSION: Despite frequent radiologic recurrences after LPEHR, symptoms remain well controlled, patient satisfaction is high, and the need for reoperation is low.

Imaging of duodenal diverticula and their complications.

Duodenal diverticula are common and are often incidentally found during routine imaging. Complications can occur but few require surgical intervention. We present a review of duodenal diverticula and their complications.

Biologic prosthesis to prevent recurrence after laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: long-term follow-up from a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: In 2006, we reported results of a randomized trial of laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair (LPEHR), comparing primary diaphragm repair (PR) with primary repair buttressed with a biologic prosthesis (small intestinal submucosa [SIS]). The primary endpoint, radiologic hiatal hernia (HH) recurrence, was higher with PR (24%) than with SIS buttressed repair (9%) after 6 months. The second phase of this trial was designed to determine the long-term durability of biologic mesh-buttressed repair. METHODS: We systematically searched for the 108 patients in phase I of this study to assess current clinical symptoms, quality of life (QOL) and determine ongoing durability of the repair by obtaining a follow-up upper gastrointestinal series (UGI) read by 2 radiologists blinded to treatment received. HH recurrence was defined as the greatest measured vertical height of stomach being at least 2 cm above the diaphragm. RESULTS: At median follow-up of 58 months (range 42 to 78 mo), 10 patients had died, 26 patients were not found, 72 completed clinical follow-up (PR, n = 39; SIS, n = 33), and 60 repeated a UGI (PR, n = 34; SIS, n = 26). There were 20 patients (59%) with recurrent HH in the PR group and 14 patients (54%) with recurrent HH in the SIS group (p = 0.7). There was no statistically significant difference in relevant symptoms or QOL between patients undergoing PR and SIS buttressed repair. There were no strictures, erosions, dysphagia, or other complications related to the use of SIS mesh. CONCLUSIONS: LPEHR results in long and durable relief of symptoms and improvement in QOL with PR or SIS. There does not appear to be a higher rate of complications or side effects with biologic mesh, but its benefit in reducing HH recurrence diminishes at long-term follow-up (more than 5 years postoperatively) or earlier.

Eponyms in radiology of the digestive tract: historical perspectives and imaging appearances. Part 2. Liver, biliary system, pancreas, peritoneum, and systemic disease.

Eponyms are a means of honoring individuals who have made lasting contributions to medicine. Eponyms are frequently encountered in the field of radiology, especially radiology of the digestive tract. However, the use of eponyms may fail to convey a precise meaning or definition and could result in miscommunication. Furthermore, in some instances, more than one individual may have contributed to the discovery or description of a particular structure or disease, whereas in others, an eponym may have been incorrectly applied and then propagated for years thereafter in the medical literature. Still, eponyms are a means of honoring those who have made important discoveries and observations, and familiarity with these terms is important for proper reporting and accurate communication. Moreover, the acquisition of some historical knowledge about the individuals whose names are associated with various structures or diseases helps restore some humanity to the science of medicine.

Eponyms in radiology of the digestive tract: historical perspectives and imaging appearances. Part I. Pharynx, esophagus, stomach, and intestine.

Eponyms serve as a means of honoring individuals who have made important discoveries and observations. Eponyms are frequently encountered in the field of radiology, particularly in radiology of the digestive tract. However, the use of eponyms may fail to convey a precise meaning or definition and could lead to miscommunication. Moreover, in some instances, more than one individual may have contributed to the discovery or description of a particular anatomic structure or disease, whereas in others, an eponym may have been incorrectly applied initially and propagated for years in the medical literature. Nevertheless, radiologic eponyms are a means of honoring those who have made lasting contributions to the field of radiology, and familiarity with these eponyms is important for proper reporting and accurate communication. In addition, the acquisition of some historical knowledge about those whose names are associated with various structures or pathologic conditions brings some humanity back into the science of medicine.

Biliary cystic disease.

Cystic diseases of the biliary tract encompass a complex group of congenital disorders. Some of the disorders, such as Caroli disease and the hepatobiliary cysts of autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease, share common embryologic origins, whereas others, such as choledochal cysts, biliary diverticula, and choledochoceles, have unclear origins. This article reviews the embryologic, clinical, pathologic, and imaging features of biliary cystic disease.

Primary neoplasms of the appendix: radiologic spectrum of disease with pathologic correlation.

Although uncommon, primary appendiceal neoplasms often result in clinical symptoms that may lead to abdominal imaging. Acute appendicitis from luminal obstruction is the most common manifestation for most tumor types. Other manifestations include intussusception, a palpable mass, gastrointestinal bleeding, increasing abdominal girth (from pseudomyxoma peritonei), and secondary genitourinary complications. Asymptomatic appendiceal neoplasms may be discovered incidentally. Mucoceles from either benign or malignant mucinous neoplasms represent the majority of appendiceal tumors detected at imaging but are the least likely to manifest as appendicitis. Pseudomyxoma peritonei is a common manifestation of mucinous adenocarcinoma. Colonic-type (nonmucinous) adenocarcinoma of the appendix is much less common than mucinous tumors and typically manifests as a focal mass without mucocele formation. Carcinoid tumor is the most common appendiceal neoplasm but is less often detected radiologically because it is typically small and relatively asymptomatic. Goblet cell carcinoid tumor and non-Hodgkin lymphoma of the appendix are rare and usually infiltrate the entire appendix. Cross-sectional imaging, particularly computed tomography (CT), is effective in the evaluation of these neoplasms. CT appears to be the modality of choice whenever an appendiceal mass is suspected. CT will help rule out or confirm an appendiceal tumor and may suggest a more specific diagnosis.

Caroli's disease: radiologic spectrum with pathologic correlation.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to describe the spectrum of radiologic and pathologic features of Caroli's disease. CONCLUSION: Caroli's disease and its complications have overlapping radiologic appearances that reflect the underlying pathology of fibrosis, ductal dilatation, cholangitis, stone formation, and malignancy.

Primary neoplasms of the appendix manifesting as acute appendicitis: CT findings with pathologic comparison.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the computed tomographic (CT) findings in patients with acute appendicitis related to an underlying appendiceal neoplasm. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical and pathologic data obtained over a 10-year period in 65 patients with primary appendiceal neoplasms were reviewed. Preoperative CT studies in patients who presented clinically with symptoms of acute appendicitis were analyzed retrospectively and in consensus by three radiologists. The appendix was evaluated on CT scans for morphology, location, presence of calcification, maximal diameter, and wall thickness. RESULTS: Twenty-six (40%) of the 65 patients with appendiceal neoplasms had presented with symptoms of acute appendicitis. Preoperative CT studies available in 22 patients showed increased appendiceal diameter, wall thickening, and periappendiceal fat stranding in 22 (100%), 22 (100%), and 21 (95%) patients, respectively. The appendiceal diameter was greater than 15 mm (mean diameter, 2.9 cm) in 19 patients (86%). Morphologic changes of concern for neoplasm were present in 19 patients (86%) and included cystic dilatation in nine patients and presence of a soft-tissue mass without dilatation in 10 patients. An appendiceal diameter greater than 15 mm and/or a morphologic abnormality were present in 21 of 22 cases (95%). CONCLUSION: CT findings strongly suggest the presence of underlying neoplasm in the majority of patients with secondary appendicitis.

Stomal metastases complicating percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: CT findings and the argument for radiologic tube placement.

OBJECTIVE: This article describes the CT appearance of metastatic implantation at the percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tract in patients with malignancy of the upper aerodigestive tract. Cumulative data from previous case reports are also considered for insight into causes of metastasis and the implications for gastrostomy placement in these patients. CONCLUSION: CT showed lobulated soft tissue involving the entire abdominal wall PEG tract in all proven cases. CT is an effective method for evaluation because the tumor burden lies predominately in the abdominal wall and not at the entry or exit site. The stomal implant is often the only site of metastatic disease at presentation. In general, CT findings of mildly increased soft tissue along the PEG tract are nonspecific, but a lobulated mass is highly suspicious for tumor implantation, especially if the one-sided thickness exceeds 1 cm. The preponderance of evidence from the existing literature points to direct tumor implantation during endoscopic placement as the likely cause (rather than hematogenous spread). This conclusion would support the alternative of radiologic tube placement in these patients.

Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of the appendix: clinical and CT findings with pathologic correlation.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this report is to describe the clinical, CT, and pathologic features of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of the vermiform appendix. CONCLUSION: Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of the appendix typically manifests with acute symptoms in patients who have no prior history of lymphoma. Most patients with the disease present clinically with signs and symptoms suggestive of acute appendicitis. On CT, lymphomatous infiltration of the appendix produces markedly diffuse mural soft-tissue thickening (range of diameters, 2.5-4.0 cm; mean diameter, 3.2 cm). The vermiform morphology of the appendix is usually maintained, and aneurysmal dilatation of the lumen is sometimes seen. Stranding of the periappendiceal fat seen on CT may represent superimposed inflammation or even direct lymphomatous extension. Coexisting abdominal lymphadenopathy is not seen in all patients. Although appendiceal lymphoma is rare, the characteristic CT appearance could lead to a preoperative diagnosis.

From the archives of the AFIP. Benign tumors and tumorlike lesions of the gallbladder and extrahepatic bile ducts: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Armed Forces Institute of Pathology.

A diverse spectrum of benign tumors and tumorlike lesions arises from the gallbladder and bile ducts, and despite their diversity, these lesions share common embryologic origins and histologic characteristics. Although these lesions are relatively uncommon, their importance lies in their ability to mimic malignant lesions in these locations. Benign neoplasms are derived from the epithelial and nonepithelial structures that compose the normal gallbladder and bile ducts. The epithelium gives rise to adenomas, cystadenomas, and the unusual condition of biliary papillomatosis. Granular cell tumors, neurofibromas, ganglioneuromas, paragangliomas, and leiomyomas are examples of benign tumors that may originate from nonepithelial structures. Tumorlike lesions are more commonly found in the gallbladder and include xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis, adenomyomatous hyperplasia, cholesterol polyps, and heterotopias. In the clinical setting of a patient with nonspecific abdominal complaints or symptoms of biliary obstruction, the discovery of a gallbladder or bile duct polyp or mass, gallbladder wall thickening, or biliary stricture is most often indicative of malignancy. However, the differential diagnosis should include benign tumors and tumorlike lesions. The preoperative determination of a benign lesion may significantly alter therapy and patient prognosis.

Nasogastric and feeding tubes.

Preview The authors' experience in a radiology department suggested to them that there is a wide range of beliefs among practitioners regarding proper placement of nasogastric and feeding tubes. Improper positioning can cause serious problems, as they explain. Indications for different tube positions, complications of incorrect tube placement, and directions for proper positioning are discussed and illustrated.