Immunotherapy in pancreatic cancer and the importance of tumour testing.

Advanced pancreatic cancer carries a poor prognosis and has traditionally been treated with chemotherapy. However, immunotherapy has made great strides in a subset of patients depending on mismatch repair/microsatellite status. We present a patient with locally advanced pancreatic cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery and additional adjuvant chemotherapy whose disease progressed while on adjuvant chemotherapy. Tumour testing showed a mismatch repair mutation and high microsatellite instability, making her eligible for treatment with immunotherapy. Germline genetic testing confirmed the clinical suspicion of Lynch syndrome. She has had isolated sites of progression treated with radiation but overall has been receiving immunotherapy for more than 3 years, highlighting the importance of tumour testing as it may allow for additional treatment options and improved survival.

Influence of Neoadjuvant Radiation Dose on Patients Undergoing Esophagectomy and Survival in Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by resection is standard of care for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer, however, a significant portion of these patients do not undergo surgical intervention. This study evaluates radiation dose and other factors associated with undergoing esophageal resection and their impact on outcomes including survival. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer between 2010 and 15 were queried from the National Cancer Database and stratified into low-dose radiation (41.4 Gy) (LDR) or high-dose radiation (50.0 or 50.4 Gy) (HDR) groups. Multivariable Logistic and Cox Regression analyses were performed to investigate the effect of multiple variables on the likelihood of undergoing esophagectomy and overall survival, respectively. Propensity score matching was performed to reduce bias between groups. RESULTS: A total of 3633 patients met study criteria with 3005 (82.7%) undergoing esophagectomy. A greater proportion received HDR (3163 (87.1%)) than LDR (470 (12.9%)). The use of LDR increased from 4.7% (n = 22) in 2010 to 20.7% (n = 154) in 2015. Factors associated with undergoing esophagectomy included LDR, adenocarcinoma histology, and younger age. Radiation dosage did not impact overall survival, but undergoing esophagectomy was associated with improved survival. After propensity matching, a greater portion of the LDR group underwent esophagectomy (87.0 vs 81.1%, p = 0.013). There was no difference in R0 3 resection (93.2 vs 92.4%, p = 0.678) or complete pathologic response (19.3 vs 21.5%, p = 0.442) between LDR and HDR groups. CONCLUSION: The use of LDR is increasing but still underutilized. LDR is associated with increased rates of esophagectomy without negatively impacting overall survival, R0 resection, or complete pathologic response.

Pattern of frequent but nontargeted pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis for hospitalized patients with cancer at academic medical centers: a prospective, cross-sectional, multicenter study.

PURPOSE: Hospitalized patients with cancer are considered to be at high risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Despite strong recommendations in numerous clinical practice guidelines, retrospective studies have shown that pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis is underutilized in hospitalized patients with cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective, cross-sectional study of hospitalized patients with cancer at five academic hospitals to determine prescription rates of thromboprophylaxis and factors influencing its use during hospitalization. RESULTS: A total of 775 patients with cancer were enrolled across five academic medical centers. Two hundred forty-seven patients (31.9%) had relative contraindications to pharmacologic prophylaxis. Accounting for contraindications to anticoagulation, the overall rate of pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis was 74.2% (95% CI, 70.4% to 78.0%; 392 of 528 patients). Among the patients with cancer without contraindications for anticoagulation, individuals hospitalized with nonhematologic malignancies were significantly more likely to receive pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis than those with hematologic malignancies (odds ratio [OR], 2.34; 95% CI, 1.43 to 3.82; P=.007). Patients with cancer admitted for cancer therapy were significantly less likely to receive pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis than those admitted for other reasons (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.61; P<.001). Sixty-three percent of patients with cancer classified as low risk, as determined by the Padua Scoring System, received anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis. Among the 136 patients who did not receive anticoagulation, 58.8% were considered to be high risk by the Padua Scoring System. CONCLUSION: We conclude that pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis is frequently administered to hospitalized patients with cancer but that nearly one third of patients are considered to have relative contraindications for prophylactic anticoagulation. Pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized patients with cancer is commonly prescribed without regard to the presence or absence of concomitant risk factors for VTE.

Cross-sensitivity between paclitaxel and docetaxel in a women's cancers program.

PURPOSE: With the use of steroid premedication, the incidence of severe hypersensitivity reactions (S-HSR) to paclitaxel is estimated to be 2%. For those who develop a S-HSR to paclitaxel, docetaxel has been employed as an alternative agent though the presence of cross-sensitivity has not been established. We sought to define the incidence of S-HSR to docetaxel following a paclitaxel S-HSR in an academic women's cancer program. METHODS: Patients treated with either paclitaxel (P) or docetaxel (D) between 11/1999 and 8/2004 were identified through our pharmacy database. Records were reviewed and data collected on those patients who had a S-HSR, defined as symptoms for which drug was discontinued, to P, D, or both. RESULTS: 718 patients received P and 93 received D. 59 received D following treatment with P. The presence of S-HSR for P was 2.2% (16/718 patients) and for D was 9.7% (9/93 patients). 10 patients with S-HSR to P crossed over to D and all nine patients reacting to D had a prior reaction to T for a cross-sensitivity rate of 90% (9/10 patients). CONCLUSIONS: Cross-sensitivity of D after P was 90% at our institution. Given the different vehicles used in P and D, it is likely attributed to the taxane moiety. Caution is required with re-challenge of patients with docetaxel if they have previously reacted to paclitaxel.

Two for good measure: six versus eight cycles of carboplatin and paclitaxel as adjuvant treatment for epithelial ovarian cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Although the standard of care for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is six cycles (6C) of platinum-taxane (PT), there have been no studies on the optimal duration of treatment in the era of adjuvant taxanes. At our center, some women receive eight cycles (8C) of PT, based on physician judgment. We were interested in evaluating the outcomes of women treated with 8C of PT for EOC as compared to a cohort who received 6C. METHODS: We retrospectively identified women with Stage III or IV EOC between 1998 and 2003 who received 6C or 8C of PT. The endpoints were disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS). CA-125 response was defined as a decrease in CA-125 of 50% in four serial samples or of 75% over three samples. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-two women met criteria for inclusion; 84 received 6C, and 38 received 8C. Comparing the cohorts receiving 6C versus 8C, 71% versus 26% were optimally debulked (P < 0.01). 79 patients were evaluable by CA-125 (52 6C/27 8C), and all responded. 88% receiving 6C and 81% receiving 8C normalized their CA-125 at end of treatment (P = 0.20). The proportion with a normal CA-125 at Cycle 2 was 29% versus 12%, respectively (P = 0.15) and, at Cycle 4, was 88% versus 36%, respectively (P < 0.01). DFS was 13 months with 6C and 8 months with 8C (P = 0.01). OS was 31 versus 23.5 months (P = 0.02), respectively. When the survival analysis is restricted to suboptimal debulked patients only, the DFS is 12.5 versus 8 months (P = 0.02), and OS is 32 versus 26.5 months (P = 0.15), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Two further cycles of PT did not improve DFS or OS for patients with advanced EOC. Patients who do not achieve remission after 6C are unlikely to benefit from additional chemotherapy using the same agents and should be considered for clinical trials involving novel agents with different mechanisms of action.

Ontogeny of phosphoinositide 3-kinase signaling in developing heart: effect of acute beta-adrenergic stimulation.

Signaling pathways underlying transition of cardiomyocyte growth from hyperplasia in fetal/newborn to hypertrophy in postnatal/adult hearts are not well understood. We have shown that beta-adrenergic receptor (beta-AR)-mediated regulation of neonatal cardiomyocyte proliferation involves p70 ribosomal protein S6 kinase (p70S6K). Here we examined the ontogeny of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/p70S6K signaling pathway in rat hearts and investigated the influence of beta-AR on this pathway during development. Cardiac PI3K and p70S6K1 activities were high in the embryonic day 20 fetus, decreased gradually postnatally, and were low in the adult. In contrast, p70S6K2 was barely detectable. Phosphorylation of p70S6K1, Akt, and phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase 1 were markedly increased in late gestation and early postnatal life but not in adult hearts. Phosphatase and tensin homolog on chromosome 10 (PTEN), a negative regulator of PI3K, was highly expressed in adult hearts but only at low levels and mostly in the phosphorylated (inactivated) form in the fetus. Beta-AR stimulation resulted in increased cardiac p70S6K1 activity only in animals > or = 2 wk old, whereas Akt level was increased in all developmental stages tested. These increases were accompanied by increased Bcl-2 associated death promoter (Ser136) phosphorylation without changes in PTEN level. Thus there is globally high input of cardiac PI3K signaling during the fetal-neonatal transition period. Inactivation of PTEN may in part contribute to the high activity of PI3K signaling, which coincides with the period of high cardiomyocyte proliferation. Beta-AR stimulation activates cardiac p70S6K1 and Akt in postnatal animals and may activate cardiac survival signals. These data provide further evidence for the importance of beta-AR and PI3K signaling in the regulation of cardiac growth during development.