How to integrate robotic training in surgical residency? An example of a 2-week robotic rotation.

General surgery residents should be proficiently trained in robotic surgery. However, there is currently no standardized robotic training curriculum. We aimed to evaluate two approaches to a robotic curriculum and how implementing a virtual reality (VR) simulation curriculum improves trainee robotic performance. From 2019 to 2022, two models of a robotic training curriculum were examined: an in-unit rotation (IUR) and a 2-week curriculum (2WR). The VR curriculum was completed using the da Vinci® Skill Simulator. The curriculum used a pre/post-test design. Residents completed a pre-test that consisted of 4 VR exercises (graded 0-100%) and 3 inanimate box trainer exercises (graded using modified Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills). Then, residents completed a VR curriculum of 23 modules. Following the curriculum, residents were given a post-test with the same pre-test exercises. Time necessary to complete the curriculum and compliance were recorded. Of the 11 residents who participated in the IUR, 4 completed the VR curriculum. Comparatively, 100% (n = 23) of residents in the 2WR completed the curriculum. Average time to complete the VR curriculum was 3.8 h. After completion of the 2WR curriculum, resident performance improved from pre-test to post-test: VR test scores increased (160% vs 223%, p < 0.001), OSATS scores increased (15.0 vs 21.0, p < 0.001), and time to complete inanimate exercises decreased (1083 vs 756 s, p = 0.001). Residents who mastered all modules had higher post-test VR scores (241% vs 214%, p = 0.024). General surgery residents demonstrated improved compliance with the 2WR. The VR curriculum improved resident robotic performance in both virtual and inanimate domains.

Prince and princesses: The current status of robotic surgery in surgical oncology.

Robotic surgery has experienced a dramatic increase in utilization across general surgery over the last two decades, including in surgical oncology. Although urologists and gynecologists were the first to show that this technology could be utilized in cancer surgery, the robot is now a powerful tool in the treatment of gastrointestinal, hepato-pancreatico-biliary, colorectal, endocrine, and soft tissue malignancies. While long-term outcomes are still pending, short-term outcomes have showed promise for this technologic advancement of cancer surgery.

Robotic pancreas surgery for pancreatic cancer.

Since the introduction of robotic pancreas surgery in the early 2000s, there has been significant increase in the adoption of the robot to perform complex pancreatic resections. However, utilization of the robot for pancreatic cancer has lagged behind due to concern for inferior oncologic outcomes. Furthermore, research in this field has previously been limited to small, single institution observational studies. Recent and ongoing randomized control trials in robotic distal pancreatectomy and robotic pancreatoduodenectomy have aimed to address concerns regarding the use of robotic techniques in pancreatic cancer. Together, these studies suggest similar, if not improved, outcomes with a robotic approach, including shorter hospital stays, expedited recovery with less post-operative complications, and equivalent resection rates, when compared to the standard open approaches. Additionally, surgical training in robotic pancreas surgery is of equal importance for patient safety. This review summarizes the available literature on the efficacy and safety of robotic pancreas surgery for pancreatic cancer, with specific focus on robotic distal pancreatectomy and robotic pancreatoduodenectomy.

Residents perform better technically, have less stress and workload, and prefer robotic to laparoscopic technique during inanimate simulation.

INTRODUCTION: With the widespread adoption of minimally invasive surgery, there is a growing need for surgical residents to be trained by a procedure-specific curriculum. This study aimed to evaluate the technical performance and feedback of surgical residents undergoing the robotic and laparoscopic hepaticojejunostomy (HJ) and gastrojejunostomy (GJ) biotissue modules. METHODS: A total of 23 PGY-3 surgical residents participated in this study and performed the laparoscopic and robotic HJ and GJ drills, which were recorded and scored by two independent graders using the modified objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS). After completing each drill, all participants filled out the NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX), Borg Exertion Scale, and Edwards Arousal Rating Questionnaire. RESULTS: Twenty-two (95.7%) residents had already received fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery certification. Eighteen (78.3%) residents had robotic virtual simulation training and the median (range) number of robotic surgery console experience was 4 (0-30). In the HJ comparison of the six OSATS domains, the robotic system was superior in Gentleness (p = 0.031). In the GJ comparison, the robotic system was superior in Time and Motion (p < 0.001), Instrument Handling (p = 0.001), Flow of Operation (p = 0.002), Tissue Exposure (p = 0.013), and Summary (p < 0.001). Participants answered significantly higher demand scores for laparoscopy on all six facets of NASA-TLX for both HJ and GJ (p < 0.05). The Borg Level of Exertion was > 2 points higher for laparoscopic HJ and GJ (p < 0.001). Residents rated more Nervousness and Anxiety for laparoscopic compared to robotic (p < 0.05) HJ and GJ. Additionally, when asked to score preference for robotic and laparoscopic approach in terms of technique and ergonomics, residents scored robot as better (laparoscopy worse) for both HJ and GJ in both domains. CONCLUSIONS: The robotic surgical system provided a more favorable environment for trainees with less mental and physical burden for minimally invasive HJ and GJ curriculum.

Number of Hepatic Resections and Association with Complication after Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Debulking: An American College of Surgeons NSQIP Database Study.

BACKGROUND: Neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases (NELM) are a major source of morbidity and mortality in neuroendocrine tumor patients and can be treated with hepatic debulking surgery (HDS). This study aims to identify variables associated with postoperative morbidity in NELM HDS. STUDY DESIGN: This analysis uses the American College of Surgeons NSQIP targeted hepatectomy-specific Participant User File from 2014 to 2020. Surgeries were grouped by number of hepatic resections performed (1 to 5, 6 to 10, greater than 10). Multivariable logistic regression and matching were used to identify prognostic factors of morbidity. RESULTS: A total of 1,163 patients were included. A total of 1,011 (87%) had 1 to 5 hepatic resections, 101 (8.7%) had 6 to 10 resections, and 51 (4.4%) had greater than 10 resections. The overall complication rate was 35%, and surgical and medical complications reached 30% and 13%, respectively. Mortality occurred in 11 patients (0.9%). Significantly higher rates of any (34% vs 35% vs 53%, p = 0.021) and surgical complications (29% vs 28% vs 49%, p = 0.007) were noted for those undergoing greater than 10 resections (1 to 5 resections, 6 to 10, greater than 10). "Bleeding requiring transfusion" (p < 0.0001) occurred more frequently in the greater than 10 resection group. On multivariable logistic regression, greater than 10 resections were an independent risk factor for any (odds ratio [OR] 2.53, p = 0.002; OR 2.52, p =. 0013) and surgical (OR 2.53, p = 0.003; OR 2.88, p = 0.005) complications compared with 1 to 5 resections and 6 to 10 resections, respectively. Medical complications (OR 2.34, p = 0.020) and length of stay greater than 5 days (OR 1.98, p = 0.032) were also increased with greater than 10 vs 1 to 5 resections. CONCLUSIONS: As reported by NSQIP, NELM HDS were performed safely with low mortality. However, more hepatic resections, especially greater than 10, were associated with increased postoperative morbidity and length of stay.

Does minimally invasive surgery have a different impact on recurrence and overall survival in patients with pancreatic head versus body/tail cancer?

OBJECTIVE: This study sought to investigate the impact of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) on recurrence and overall survival between patients with pancreatic head versus body/tail cancers. METHODS: The risk factors associated with recurrence and long-term outcomes were analyzed according to tumor location and operative modality. RESULTS: A total of 288 and 87 patients underwent surgical resection for pancreatic head cancer and body/tail cancer, respectively. The perioperative outcomes and histopathologic results were comparable in open and MIS approach in both head and body/tail groups. There was no difference in local or systemic recurrence patterns and disease-free and overall survival rates according to primary tumor location and surgical modality. During subgroup analysis by stage; however, patients with stage III pancreatic head cancer in the MIS group had a decreased disease-free survival compared with those in the open surgery group (p = 0.020). On multivariate analysis, MIS was not a risk factor of total or local recurrences. CONCLUSIONS: Recurrence patterns and overall survival rates of patients did not differ according to tumor location and surgical approach. However, patients with stage III pancreatic head cancer in the MIS group showed inferior disease-free survival relative to patients who underwent open surgery.

Extended postoperative thromboprophylaxis after pancreatic resection for pancreatic cancer is associated with decreased risk of venous thromboembolism in the minimally invasive approach.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is associated with increased venous thromboembolism (VTE). We sought to compare rates of bleeding complications and VTE in patients receiving extended postoperative thromboprophylaxis (EPT) to those who did not, and identify risk factors for VTE after pancreatectomy for PDAC. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of pancreatectomies for PDAC. EPT was defined as 28 days of low molecular weight heparin. Multivariable analysis (MVA) was performed to identify independent risk factors of VTE. RESULTS: Of 269 patients included, 142 (52.8%) received EPT. Of those who received EPT, 7 (4.9%) suffered bleeding complications, compared to 6 (4.7%) of those who did not (p = 0.938). There was no significant difference in VTE rate at 90 days (2.8% vs. 2.4%, p = 0.728) or at 1 year (6.3% vs. 7.9%, p = 0.624). On MVA, risk factors for VTE included worse performance status, lower preoperative hematocrit, R1/R2 resection, and minimally invasive (MIS) approach. Among those who received EPT, there was no difference in VTE rate between MIS and open approach. CONCLUSIONS: EPT was not associated with a difference in VTE risk or bleeding complications. MIS approach was associated with a higher risk of VTE; however, this was significantly lower among those who received EPT.

Development of a Two-Week Dedicated Robotic Surgery Curriculum for General Surgery Residents.

BACKGROUND: Robotic surgery has seen exponential growth over the past several years. However, there is no standardized training program implemented nationwide. Thus, there is a challenge in how to measure surgical proficiency and how to train future surgeons. METHODS: In this study, all PGY3 general surgery residents from the University of Chicago residency program were assigned the curriculum. The curriculum consisted of seven sections: instrument mastery, simulation curriculum, suturing, inanimate drills, laparoscopic/open comparisons, surveys, mentor sessions, and exposure in the operating room. It was administered via a 2-week dedicated robotic rotation. CONCLUSIONS: With the inevitable integration of robotic surgery in the operating room, it has become imperative to prepare future surgeons. However, learning curves and a resistance to voluntary compliance have halted progress. Thus, providing mastery-based training and protected time away from clinic duties is paramount. This curriculum aims to reduce these barriers and provide a standardizable training curriculum.

Robotic Central Bisectionectomy for Centrally Located Hepatic Malignant Tumor.

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic hepatectomies for centrally located tumors are classified as advanced and complex surgical procedures.1-3 Because of some limitations in robotic liver surgery,4,5 robotic central bisectionectomy has rarely been performed.6,7 We introduce useful tips for robotic central bisectionectomy in this multimedia article. METHODS: A 67-year-old male with a 4.4-cm-sized, hepatocellular carcinoma involving segments IV and VIII underwent robotic central bisectionectomy. This video demonstrates technique of determination of resection line,3 traction methods,8 effective use of robotic instruments for parenchymal transection, application of Pringle's maneuver, and indocyanine-green fluorescence image in robotic central bisectionectomy. RESULTS: Total operative time was 320 min and intraoperative blood loss was 200 ml without transfusion. The postoperative course was uneventful and the patient was discharged on the seventh postoperative day in good condition. Pathological assessment indicated that the mass was a hepatocellular carcinoma 4.5 cm in size with a surgical margin of 1.5 cm. CONCLUSIONS: Central bisectionectomy is one of the most demanding surgical procedures with long operative times. However, robotic central bisectionectomy can be safely performed with proper exposure technique and an appropriate combination of several useful technical tips.

Defer surgery in operable breast cancer: how long is too long?

PURPOSE: The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate outcomes of surgery compared to primary endocrine therapy (PET) in patients with non-advanced, operable invasive breast cancer, and to determine if PET as initial therapy may safely postpone surgery. METHODS: The MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane Library were searched from database inception to July 2020 to identify eligible studies. Inclusion criteria were experimental or observational studies with at least one arm treated with PET and a second arm treated with surgery with or without PET. Local recurrence or progression of disease was defined as either failure of non-operative management (tumor failing to decrease in size and/or continuous local or distant tumor growth) or relapse of breast tumor after tumor downsizing following PET. Effect estimates were expressed in hazard ratio and 95% confidence intervals (HR (95% CI)). RESULTS: The analysis included six studies with 1499 unique patients. The median time to local progression of disease was 2.3 years. Patients treated with PET alone without surgery had a higher risk of local recurrence and or progression [HR (95% CI): 1.76 (1.33, 2.31); I2 = 84%; p < 0.001]. Patients treated with PET had more favorable outcomes in terms of overall survival [HR (95% CI): 1.24 (1.06, 1.46); I2 = 70%; p = 0.008] and less favorable outcomes in breast cancer-specific survival [HR (95% CI): 1.13 (0.98, 1.31); I2 = 41%; p = 0.10]. The risk of publication bias was assessed to be high in reporting local recurrence rates and low in reporting distant recurrence rates. CONCLUSION: PET alone is inferior to surgery in the treatment of operable invasive breast cancer. However, it may be acceptable to postpone curative breast cancer surgery without risk of progression for 1.1 years or longer.

Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the gallbladder: early detection and surgery is key to improved outcome.

PURPOSE: Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) of the gallbladder are very rare. As a result, the classification of pathologic specimens from gallbladder NENs, currently classified as gallbladder neuroendocrine tumors (GB-NETs) and carcinomas (GB-NECs), is inconsistent and makes nomenclature, classification, and management difficult. Our study aims to evaluate the epidemiological trend, tumor biology, and outcomes of GB-NET and GB-NEC over the last 5 decades. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of the SEER database from 1973 to 2016. The epidemiological trend was analyzed using the age-adjusted Joinpoint regression analysis. Survival was assessed with Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression was used to assess predictors of poor survival. RESULTS: A total of 482 patients with GB-NEN were identified. Mean age at diagnosis was 65.2 ± 14.3 years. Females outnumbered males (65.6% vs. 34.4%). The Joinpoint nationwide trend analysis showed a 7% increase per year from 1973 to 2016. The mean survival time after diagnosis of GB-NEN was 37.11 ± 55.3 months. The most common pattern of nodal distribution was N0 (50.2%) followed by N1 (30.9%) and N2 (19.2%). Advanced tumor spread (into the liver, regional, and distant metastasis) was seen in 60.3% of patients. Patients who underwent surgery had a significant survival advantage (111.0 ± 8.3 vs. 8.3 ± 1.2 months, p < 0.01). Cox regression analysis showed advanced age (p < 0.01), tumor stage (P < 0.01), tumor extension (p < 0.01), and histopathologic grade (p < 0.01) were associated with higher mortality. CONCLUSION: Gallbladder NENs are a rare histopathological variant of gallbladder cancer that is showing a rising incidence in the USA. In addition to tumor staging, surgical resection significantly impacts patient survival, when patients are able to undergo surgery irrespective of tumor staging. Advanced age, tumor extension, and histopathological grade of the tumor were associated with higher mortality.

Gallbladder cancer: Historical treatment and new management options.

Gallbladder cancer is a rare, aggressive malignancy that has a poor overall prognosis. Effective treatment consists of early detection and surgical treatment. With the wide spread treatment of gallbladder disease with minimally invasive techniques, the rate of incidental gallbladder cancer has seen an equitable rise along with stage migration towards earlier disease. Although the treatment remains mostly surgical, newer modalities such as regional therapy as well as directed therapy based on molecular medicine has led to improved outcomes in patients with advanced disease. We aim to summarize the management of gallbladder cancer along with the newer developments in this formidable disease process.

Simultaneous Robot Assisted Colon and Liver Resection for Metastatic Colon Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Simultaneous robot assisted colon and liver resections are being performed more frequently at present due to the expanded adoption of the robotic platform for surgical management of metastatic colon cancer. However, this approach has not been studied in detail with only case series available in the literature. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the current body of evidence on the feasibility of performing simultaneous robotic colon and liver resections. METHODS: A systematic review was performed through PubMed to identify relevant articles describing simultaneous colon and liver resections for metastatic colon cancer. RESULTS: A total of 28 patients underwent simultaneous resections robotically with an average operative time of 420.3 minutes and average blood loss of 275.6 ml. Postoperative stay was 8.6 days on average with all cases achieving negative surgical margins. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer with liver metastases is technically feasible and seems oncologically equivalent to open or laparoscopic surgery. Further studies are urgently needed to assess benefits of robotic surgery in the patient population.