Breast cancer after curative chemotherapy in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: examination of the role of drug resistance and retrospective comparison to the outcome of de novo breast cancer.

We examined the outcome of patients who developed breast cancer after curative chemotherapy (CHOP) for aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) in comparison to the outcome of a retrospectively selected matched-pair group of patients with de novo breast cancer, and evaluated the role of drug resistance-related protein (MDR, MRP, LRP) expression in breast cancer tissue. Twenty-two patients presented with breast cancer (BC) in complete remission after CHOP for NHL. The median age was 62 (49-70) years, each had high/intermediate grade B-cell NHL treated with 6 courses of CHOP, and were in complete remission. These patients were compared to a matched-pair group of de novo BC patients selected from our database over the same time period. Breast cancer tissue was stained by immunohistochemistry for drug resistance proteins LRP, MRP, and MDR. Breast cancer developed after a median of 26 (9-49) months of NHL diagnosis; breast tumor grades 1-2 were seen in 12, and grade 3 in 10 patients; 15 were negative and 7 weakly positive for estrogen and progesterone receptors. Twelve patients were stage IIIA/B, and 10 stage IV and were treated with conventional chemotherapy regimens. All progressed early in liver (n=13), brain (n=9), lung (n=6), bone (n=8), lymph nodes (n=7) and soft tissue (n=5), and received second-line chemotherapy with mitomycin-C + vinblastine or taxanes. The overall survival was 11.8 (6-26) months (p<0.01). Time from NHL to breast cancer development was 19 (14-27) months in patients with positive drug resistance proteins (group A), and 37 (26-56) months in patients with 1 or 2 positive resistance proteins (group B) (p<0.001). In patients with stage IIIA/B disease, there was no difference between the examined and control matched-pair group in median TTP, but there was in overall survival (OS) (23 vs 36 months, p=0.029). In advanced disease, there were more responders in the control vs the examined group (p=0.07). Patients in the control matched-pair group had more prolonged OS when compared to group A patients who developed BC in <24 months from NHL to BC (p=0.017). We conclude that breast cancer developing shortly after a complete response in NHL, is an aggressive disease variant with minimal potential for response to conventional chemotherapy. Analysis of drug resistance mechanisms concerning MDR, MRP and LRP indicates that most of these patients have BC that overexpress these proteins leading to the suggestion that these mechanisms might be a part of the aggressive disease phenotype and partially explain the poor outcome.

Two different schedules of irinotecan (CPT-11) in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma relapsing after a 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin combination. A randomized study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of irinotecan as second-line treatment in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (ACC) failing or relapsing after 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) plus leucovorin (LV) standard chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Irinotecan was randomly administered in two different schedules (once every 3 weeks, and every 10 days) in patients failing prior 5-FU plus LV. Patients were randomized to two treatment groups: group A received irinotecan 350 mg/m2 every 21 days and group B received irinotecan 175 mg/m2 days 1 and 10 every 21 days. RESULTS: Group A comprised 60 patients: 34 male/26 female, median age 64 years (range 48-70 years), and median Karnofsky performance status (PS) 90. Their metastatic sites included liver (n=47), lymph nodes (n=27), lung (n=14), abdomen (n=14), pelvis (n=8), "other" (n=2), and local recurrence (n=12). Group B comprised 60 patients: 36 male/24 female, median age 62 years (46-70 years), and median PS 90. Their metastatic sites included liver (n=49), lymph nodes (n=29), lung (n=17), abdomen (n=16), pelvis (n=11), "other" (n=2), and local recurrence (n=13). Group A showed the following responses: complete response (CR) 2, partial response (PR) 12, stable disease (SD) 21, progressive disease (PD) 26, overall response rate (ORR) 23%, tumor growth control 58%. Group B showed the following responses: CR 1, PR 14, SD 22, PD 23; ORR 25%; tumor growth control 62%. Toxicities included acute cholinergic syndrome (group A 53%, group B 19%; P<0.0001), late-onset diarrhea grade 1/2 (group A 21%, group B 46%) and grade 3/4 (group A 41%, group B 66%; P<0.0001), nausea and vomiting grade 1/2 (group A 34%, group B 59%) and grade 3/4 (group A 30%, group B 12%; P<0.0001), neutropenia grade 3/4 (group A 27%, group B 28%; P<0.03), with febrile neutropenia seen in only four patients in group A, anemia grade more than 2 (group A 28%, group B 12%; P<0.05), asthenia grade more than 3 (group A 24%, group B 18%; P<0.001), and alopecia grade more than 3 (group A 40%, group B 34%; P<0.2). CONCLUSIONS: . The present study indicates that, in patients with ACC who have relapsed after 5-FU plus LV, the administration of irinotecan fractionated into two doses every 21 days yields a similar efficacy to, but a much lower incidence of toxicity than, the same total dose of irinotecan administered once every 21 days.

Phase I-II study of docetaxel and ifosfamide combination in patients with anthracycline pretreated advanced breast cancer.

Given the established individual activity of docetaxel and ifosfamide in anthracycline pretreated advanced breast cancer, the present phase I-II study aimed to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), and activity of the docetaxel-ifosfamide combination in this setting. Cohorts of three to six patients with histologically confirmed metastatic breast cancer after prior anthracycline-based chemotherapy were treated at successive dose levels (DLs) with escalated doses of docetaxel 70-100 mg x m(-2) over 1 h on day 1 followed by ifosfamide 5-6 g x m(-2) divided over days 1 and 2 (2.5-3.0 g x m(-2) day(-1) over 1 h), and recycled every 21 days. G-CSF was added once dose-limiting neutropenia was encountered at a certain DL and planned to be incorporated prophylactically in subsequent higher DLs. In total, 56 patients with a median age of 54.5 (range, 32-72) years and performance status (WHO) of 1 (range, 0-2) were treated at five DLs as follows: 21 in phase I DLs (DL1: 3, DL2: 6, DL3: 3, DL4: 6, and DL5: 3) and the remaining 35 were treated at DL4 (total of 41 patients at DL4), which was defined as the level for phase II testing. All patients were assessable for toxicity and 53 for response. Dose-limiting toxicity (with the addition of G-CSF after DL2) was reached at DL5 with two out of three initial patients developing febrile neutropenia (FN). Clinical response rates, on an intention-to-treat basis, in phase II were: 53.6% (95% CI, 38.3-68.9%); three complete remissions, 19 partial remissions, seven stable disease, and 12 progressive disease. The median response duration was 7 months (3-24 months), median time to progression 6.5 month (0.1-26 month), and median overall survival 13 months (0.1-33 months). Grade 3/4 toxicities included time to progression neutropenia in 78% of patients-with 63% developing grade 4 neutropenia (

Etoposide, leucovorin (LV) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in 5-FU+LV pre-treated patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

In the present study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of the weekly combination of etoposide, leucovorin (LV) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) when administered as second-line chemotherapy in patients with relapsed/refractory advanced colorectal cancer (ACC), previously treated with weekly LV+5-FU. Etoposide was administered at 3 different dose levels (DLs), in 3 groups of 20 patients each (total: 60); DL-I: etoposide 80 mg/m2, DL-II: etoposide 120 mg/m2, and DL-III: etoposide 180 mg/m2, in 45 min i.v. infusion, and followed in all levels by LV 100 mg/m2 i.v. over 1 hour and 5-FU 500 mg/m2 i.v. bolus. Treatment was administered weekly until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. No patients at DL-I responded, while 2 patients at DL-II and 3 at DL-III had a partial response (PR). Stable disease (SD) rates were as follows; at DL-I: 2, DL-II: 8 and DL-III: 9. More patients in DL-I progressed (n = 19) compared to DL-II (n=10) and DL-II (n = 8) (p < 0.0007). Time to progression was for DL-I, -II, -III: 17, 15, and 14 weeks, respectively. Median survival was DL-I, -II, -III: 30, 30, and 32.5 weeks, respectively. Toxicity consisted mainly of neutropenia, diarrhea and mucositis at all DLs, and was significantly more severe in DL-III. No difference was noted in responses between DL-II and DL-III. The authors conclude that the combination of etoposide with LV+5-FU has limited activity when administered after failure of weekly LV+5-FU in patients with ACC and should not be recommended for further evaluation.

Gemcitabine and docetaxel as second-line chemotherapy for patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma who fail prior paclitaxel plus platinum-based regimens.

BACKGROUND: Treatment options for patients with recurrent nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) remain limited as a result of poor activity of older agents after platinum-based therapy. In the current Phase II study, the authors evaluated the combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel in patients with recurrent NSCLC. METHODS: Patients with advanced NSCLC (Stage IIIB-IV), a World Health Organization performance status (PS) < or = 2, prior paclitaxel plus platinum-based chemotherapy, and unimpaired hematopoietic and organ function were eligible. Chemotherapy was administered as follows: gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) was administered on Days 1 and 8 followed by docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) on Day 8, and this regimen was recycled every 21 days. Prophylactic granulocyte-colony stimulating factor was administered on Days 10-14 or until the patient achieved a white blood cell count > or = 5000/microL. RESULTS: Of 43 patients who were entered on the study, 41 patients were evaluable for response, and all were evaluable for toxicity. The median patient age was 63 years (range, 47-70 years), the median PS was 1 (range, 0-2), there were 38 male patients, and there were 5 female patients. Four patients had Stage IIIA disease, 17 patients had Stage IIIB disease, and 22 patients had Stage IV disease. Histologies included 19 patients with adenocarcinoma, 18 patients with squamous cell carcinoma, and 3 patients with large cell carcinoma. Metastatic sites included lymph nodes in 28 patients, bone in 6 patients, liver in 5 patients, brain in 5 patients, lung nodules in 8 patients, adrenals in 7 patients, and other sites in 3 patients. All patients had received prior paclitaxel plus platinum-based treatment; 28 patients had received prior paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin. Objective responses were partial response (PR) in 14 of 43 patients [33%; 95% confidence interval [95%CI], 18.5-46.6%], stable disease (SD) in 16 of 43 patients (37%; 95% CI, 22.8-51.6%), and progressive disease (PD) in 13 of 43 patients (30%; 95% CI, 16.3-43.7%). The median time to disease progression was 6 months (range, 1.0-20.0+ months), and the median survival was 8.5 months (range, 1.5-20.0+ months). The 1-year survival rate was 28%. Grade 3-4 neutropenia was experienced by 53% of patients (30% Grade 4), with 14% of patients experiencing febrile neutropenia. Grade 3 thrombocytopenia was experienced by 7% of patients (no Grade 4), whereas other Grade 3 nonhematologic toxicities were never encountered. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel is active and is well tolerated in patients with advanced NSCLC who have failed prior taxane plus platinum chemotherapy. This regimen represents a tolerable and effective combination to apply in the palliative treatment of patients with recurrent NSCLC.

Leucovorin + 5-fluorouracil plus dipyridamole in leucovorin + 5-fluorouracil-pretreated patients with advanced colorectal cancer: a pilot study of three different dipyridamole regimens.

Dipyridamole, an inhibitor of nucleoside transport, increases the activity of 5-fluorouracil in a dose-dependent manner. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether dipyridamole with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin gave an improved therapeutic outcome. Sixty patients entered in the present pilot study had previously received 5-fluorouracil (450 mg/m2) and leucovorin (100 mg/m2), every week, and relapsed during this treatment, which ended at least 6 weeks prior to study entry. Dipyridamole was administered at three different dosing schedules (DS) and methods of administration in three groups of patients. DS I: dipyridamole, 30 mg/m2 in normal saline solution, in 90 min iv infusion, followed by leucovorin, 100 mg/m2 iv push, followed by 5-fluorouracil, 450 mg/m2 in normal saline solution, in 60 min iv infusion, dipyridamole tablets (75 mg) every 12 hrs, continuously during the time of chemotherapy. DS II: dipyridamole, 50 mg/m2 in normal saline solution, in 90 min iv infusion, and the rest was the same as DS I. DS III: without oral dipyridamole, patients received dipyridamole (50 mg/m2) iv in the same manner as in DS I and II. Treatment was continued until tumor progression or unacceptable toxicity. All patients (n = 60) entered in the present study were assessable for response and toxicity. No complete response was observed. No patient at DS I responded, whereas 2 patients at DS II and 3 at DS III had a partial response (P <0.1). Stable disease was found with DS I (n = 1), DS II (n = 8) and DS III (n = 9) (P <0.01). More patients progressed at DS I (n = 19) than at DS II (n = 10) and DS III (n = 8) (P <0.0007). The median duration of response was 11 weeks (range, 8-16). Time to progression was 17 weeks for DS I, 15 weeks (range, 10-19) for DS II, and 14 weeks (range, 11-21) for DS III (P = 0.43). Median survival did not differ significantly between DS I (29 weeks; range, 14-48), DS II(31.5 weeks; range, 17-63) and DS III (36 weeks; range, 16-58) (P = 0.2). Neutropenia was most severe with DS I (grade 2, P<0.01) and DS II (grade 1, P<0.05) and nausea/vomiting with DS I (grade 0, P < 0.0005, grade 1, P <0.0002, grade 2, P <0.02) and DS III (grade 3, P<0.0009). Diarrhea was most severe in DS II (grade 3, P <0.005). Mucositis was increased in DS II (grade 0, P <0.008), anorexia in DS II (grade 0, P <0.032) and fatigue in DS I (grade 0, P <0.003). More patients in DS I than with the other two DS experienced headache (P <0.044). According to the response achieved at DS III (15% partial response and 45% stable disease) and the toxicity which was well tolerated mainly in this DS (except for nausea and vomiting grade 3, P <0.009), it can be stated that DS III is the appropriate dose and the simplest schedule of administration (administration of dipyridamole during therapy only). In conclusion, it appears that dipyridamole might still have a role in enhancing the clinical activity of drugs involved in the inhibition of the thymidylate synthetase biochemical pathway and its activity in combination with these agents (5-fluorouracil + leucovorin) as frontline treatment should therefore be explored in future phase II studies.