Adolescents with type 1 diabetes vs. hybrid closed loop systems: a case series of patients' behaviour that challenges the algorithm.

OBJECTIVES: Hybrid closed loop systems (HCL) improve the management of type 1 diabetes (T1DM). T1DM adolescent patients represent a risk category also if they are in an automated insulin infusion delivery therapy. CASE PRESENTATION: We describe a series of four cases in which adolescent patients have adopted incorrect behaviours in the managing of HCL systems, challenging the algorithm skills. Two patients performed fabricated sensor calibrations. The other two did not perform pre-prandial insulin boluses correctly. Despite these behaviours, the algorithm corrected the glucose values in three out of four patients. Only in one case, where fabricated calibrations were too frequent, the automatic system failed to restore the glycemic balance. CONCLUSIONS: Fabricated calibrations seem to be more important than uncorrected insulin boluses to challenge the HCL systems.

Corrigendum: The silent epidemic of diabetic ketoacidosis at diagnosis of type 1 diabetes in children and adolescents in italy during the covid-19 pandemic in 2020.

[This corrects the article .].

Very low birth weight newborn with diabetes mellitus due to pancreas agenesis managed with insulin pump reservoir filled with undiluted insulin: 16-month follow-up.

BACKGROUND: When very low doses of insulin are used insulin dilution, a procedure prone to errors, is recommended. CASE PRESENTATION: We managed a neonate with pancreas agenesis with insulin pump therapy from the first days of life to 16 months of age without insulin dilution. Predictive low glucose suspend mode first and then closed loop control were used. No episodes of severe hypoglycemia were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Though limited to a single patient with pancreas agenesis we believe that the use of pump should be warranted in patients with permanent neonatal diabetes mellitus and intestinal malabsorption, even with undiluted insulin.

The Silent Epidemic of Diabetic Ketoacidosis at Diagnosis of Type 1 Diabetes in Children and Adolescents in Italy During the COVID-19 Pandemic in 2020.

Aim/Hypothesis: To compare the frequency of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) at diagnosis of type 1 diabetes in Italy during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 with the frequency of DKA during 2017-2019. Methods: Forty-seven pediatric diabetes centers caring for >90% of young people with diabetes in Italy recruited 4,237 newly diagnosed children with type 1 diabetes between 2017 and 2020 in a longitudinal study. Four subperiods in 2020 were defined based on government-imposed containment measures for COVID-19, and the frequencies of DKA and severe DKA compared with the same periods in 2017-2019. Results: Overall, the frequency of DKA increased from 35.7% (95%CI, 33.5-36.9) in 2017-2019 to 39.6% (95%CI, 36.7-42.4) in 2020 (p=0.008), while the frequency of severe DKA increased from 10.4% in 2017-2019 (95%CI, 9.4-11.5) to 14.2% in 2020 (95%CI, 12.3-16.4, p<0.001). DKA and severe DKA increased during the early pandemic period by 10.4% (p=0.004) and 8% (p=0.002), respectively, and the increase continued throughout 2020. Immigrant background increased and high household income decreased the probability of presenting with DKA (OR: 1.55; 95%CI, 1.24-1.94; p<0.001 and OR: 0.60; 95 CI, 0.41-0.88; p=0.010, respectively). Conclusions/Interpretation: There was an increase in the frequency of DKA and severe DKA in children newly diagnosed with type 1 diabetes during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, with no apparent association with the severity of COVID-19 infection severity or containment measures. There has been a silent outbreak of DKA in children during the pandemic, and preventive action is required to prevent this phenomenon in the event of further generalized lockdowns or future outbreaks.

Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in preschool children: butt or tummy, which is the best infusion set site?

BACKGROUND: Choosing the right infusion set site can be an important factor in obtaining good glycemic control, especially in very young children. In an attempt to identify the best infusion site, we performed a crossover study in six preschool children with type 1 diabetes using insulin pump therapy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We enrolled six patients 5.2±0.7 years old (range, 4-6 years), with type 1 diabetes for more than 1.5 years, using insulin pump therapy for at least 6 months. For each patient, body mass index, glycated hemoglobin, and all data downloaded from the system were evaluated on two occasions: the first with the infusion set placed on the buttock and the second on the abdomen, each for 3 days. The order of infusion set placement was randomized. Mean capillary blood glucose, mean continuous glycemia, mean area under the curve (AUC) using the trapezoidal rule for both >140 mg/dL and <70 mg/dL, insulin daily dose, carbohydrate/insulin ratio, total basal insulin, total bolus insulin, and mean amplitude of glucose excursions (MAGE) were evaluated. RESULTS: Mean glycemic values, mean AUC >140 mg/dL, and MAGE were significantly lower when the infusion set was placed on the buttock versus the abdomen (144.6±31.9 mg/dL vs. 166.0±34.8 mg/dL [P=0.000], 28.4±18.3% vs. 48.8±28.2% [P=0.000], and 32±10 vs. 60±15 mg/dL [P<0.001], respectively), whereas mean AUC <70 mg/dL was higher (1.47±2.77% vs. 0.87±1.03% [P<0.001]). CONCLUSIONS: The present findings suggest that preschool children with type 1 diabetes using insulin pump therapy could benefit from inserting the infusion set in the buttock instead of the abdomen.